>>510823961I agree with many of your sentiments...but my guy...Most modeling and screen acting relies on a slew of techniques to make people more attractive than they really are. Makeup, hair, wardrobe, lighting, angles, surgery.
They also make sure the costars are just the right amount of attractiveness, to make the leads look more normal, by comparison, or better by contrast. Slapping a bunch of women in a group sometimes triggers "the Cheerleader effect" uplifting all the members into a high tier of attractiveness.
Have you ever noticed truly beautiful women, are almost never hired as actresses? You can often find extras in the background more attractive than the leads.
Same thing with models, high fashion print, runway, and even "supermodels". There's glamor/nude models that blow them out of the water. There's some department store catalog models and instgram nobodies, that are more beautiful than the highest paid models in the world, that never make it big. Directly because the beauty based industries, actively seek out women that are little less than, and then use everything in their power to promote them as paragons of beauty.
Almost every "beautiful" actress have huge flaws, catch them at the wrong angle and they're mannish, or ugly. Jennifer Connelly asymmetrical jaw, horse mouth. Elizabeth Hurley, man face. Brooke Shields man chin/jaw. Sydney Sweeny looks retarded in a straight viewing. Nicole Kidman weird skull/face structure. Almost every woman in the spotlight is not what she appears.
Not that I'm defending Hunter, he's a troll. I'm just pointing out that it's a deceptive industry.