Thread 510824779

Remember, all you vicious antichrist children of the devil (John 8:44), no matter how many antichrist threads you create, you are all going to end up in the lake of fire together with your antichristian zionist false prophecy :)

The wrath of God is upon (((You))) and your synagogue of satan.

Revelation 19:20, 20:15

>>510824779 (OP)
Jesus was a pedophile schizo with a God complex.
>Every one of Jesus’ apostles besides Peter was underage (neaniskos is the Greek word used)
>When a woman questions why he hangs out with kids he says “don’t scandalize me”
>Tells these boys he will make them “fishers of men”
>Goes into upper rooms and washes their feet while naked
>Tells them to “eat his flesh and drink his haima” (if you think this means “blood” here, see Ezekiel 23:20)
>Is arrested in a public park at 4am with a naked boy (see Mark 14:51-52)
>When the cops show up he says “why do you come for me with swords and clubs like I’m some kind of leistes”
>The word leistes, which gets translated as “thief” is actually “pirate” and was used in contemporary texts (many examples such as Lucian’s Alexander) to refer to sex traffickers
>Sex trafficking was a big problem in the Mediterranean and one of the big things the Romans did was crack down on the pedo pirates. Julius Caesar himself was kidnapped by them as a kid and afterwards had them all crucified
>Jesus Christ was in fact crucified between two other leistes
There's a reason Jesus's "Most Beloved Disciple" is always depicted as a beardless boy whereas the rest of his followers had beards. Dude liked em young.

>>510824779 (OP)
Glory to Jesus Christ

Glory to the Lord Jesus Christ, the only-begotten Son of God

Gentle reminder that you are not a true Christian, if you support Trump as he protects pedophiles…
Unless of course, you support pedophiles too
I mean, let’s all be honest. The age of consent is far too high..
So maybe you can be a true question if you support pedophilia.

>>510824779 (OP)
Jehovah's Witnesses here, AMA.

>>510824903
To be a Christian is to be a disciple of Christ, not a republican or libtarded.

>>510824903
You are not Christian if you support ANY politician.

>>510824779 (OP)
Yep the antichrist shills are out in force today, too bad they fail to realize our faith in Jesus Christ is unshakable.

>>510824779 (OP)
and i suppose you will go to nigger heaven?

>>510824779 (OP)
Believe it or not, but there is not a single verse in the entire Bible that specifically calls the Jews or the tribe of Judah God’s chosen people. This misconception comes from the fact that the Jews of today have declared themselves to be Israel and not the house of Judah, as the Scriptures rightfully call them.

https://youtu.be/eT_RUdBTlp4

>>510824779 (OP)
What is the purpose of this thread?
Do you even desire for the lost to be saved?
Preach repentance, not simply judgement.
Do not take pleasure in the judgement of others - it is a good sign that you yourself will partake in it.

“For God so loved the world, that He gave His only begotten Son, that whoever believes in Him shall not perish, but have eternal life. For God did not send the Son into the world to judge the world, but that the world might be saved through Him. He who believes in Him is not judged; he who does not believe has been judged already, because he has not believed in the name of the only begotten Son of God. And this is the judgment, that the Light has come into the world, and men loved the darkness rather than the Light, for their deeds were evil. For everyone who does evil hates the Light, and does not come to the Light lest his deeds be exposed. But he who practices the truth comes to the Light, so that his deeds may be manifested as having been done by God.”
— John 3:16-21

Christ is already in hell, christcucks accept a sacrifice where jesus becomes a sex slave to satan to save their own cowardly asses.

I love my Jesus Christ.
I am married with my God Jesus Christ.
Only my God Jesus Christ loves me and keeps me safe.
I love only my God Jesus Christ.
We stick together forever.
We are inseparable.
My God Jesus Messiah and me, we live forever together in his crib happily ever after.

>>510825062
People don't think rationally on the inter-webs..

>>510824779 (OP)
Jesus wasn't even a real person, dummy

>pic related

>>510824930
Please, repent and be saved.
Jesus Christ is God.

Then Jesus said to him, “Go, Satan! For it is written, ‘You shall worship the Lord your God, and serve Him only.’”
— Matthew 4:10

And those who were in the boat worshiped Him, saying, “You are truly God’s Son!”
— Matthew 14:33

And behold, Jesus met them and said, “Greetings!” And they came up and took hold of His feet and worshiped Him.
— Matthew 28:9

And when they saw Him, they worshiped Him; but some doubted.
— Matthew 28:17

>>510824779 (OP)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0Tf72DtkGvI

>>510825247
It is recognized universally that Jesus was real, even if you believe him to not be God. You live in ignorance to keep your vices. Repent before God for your pride.

>>510824849
nobody can refute any of my claims, you christcucks worship jewish pedophiles

>>510825318
>It is recognized universally that Jesus was real,
Here's a list of dozens of historians who say Jesus was not real. Don't come complaining to me, you made the rules

https://www.richardcarrier.info/archives/21420

>>510825042
We who believe are the spiritual seed of Abraham:
Just as Abraham believed God and it was counted to him as righteousness, so know that those who are of faith, those are sons of Abraham.
— Galatians 3:6-7
And if you belong to Christ, then you are Abraham’s seed, heirs according to promise.
— Galatians 3:29

However, the physical seed of Abraham (that is the Jews) are still loved by God:
From the standpoint of the gospel they are enemies for your sake, but from the standpoint of God’s choice they are beloved for the sake of the fathers; for the gifts and the calling of God are irrevocable.
— Romans 11:28-29

>>510824849
This isn’t theology, it’s slander stitched together from bad Greek, worse exegesis, and Reddit-tier conspiracy. “Leistes” doesn’t mean sex trafficker, it means insurrectionist or revolutionary. That’s why Barabbas was called a leistes. Rome didn’t crucify people for trafficking. It crucified threats to Caesar. Neaniskos? It means young man, not toddler. Every use in the New Testament refers to adult males, just read John’s gospel. And the beloved disciple being beardless? That’s iconography shaped by cultural idealism, not photographic evidence. Looks like you want theology from memes. Foot-washing was a cultural act of humility, not eroticism. Jesus wasn’t naked. Scripture says he laid aside outer garments, not all clothing. Ezekiel 23? It’s prophetic imagery of idolatry, not a secret code for cannibalism. And Mark 14:51? The “young man” fleeing naked was not Jesus, and scholars have debated the symbolism for centuries. It doesn’t imply abuse. It points to the chaos and fear during the arrest. You got some real Reddit-level education there, Dr. Hillman.

>>510824779 (OP)
No
Jesus is Jesus
God is God
Lords are Lords
gods are gods
archangels
regular angels
demons
Satan
swine

they are not interchangeable

>>510825262
In response to that image, yes if one genuinely believes they will be saved.
However, many can deceive themselves into thinking that they believe when they do not.
True faith is demonstrated through repentance.

Let the wicked forsake his way
And the unrighteous man his thoughts;
And let him return to Yahweh,
And He will have compassion on him,
And to our God,
For He will abundantly pardon.
— Isaiah 55:7

>>510825247
Back again, Richard?

>>510825327
pic is how heaven must looks like, it's where op will go to, isn't that great. one race the human race, we are all the same under christ

>>510825318
>It is recognized universally that Jesus was real
Entirely false. It's at best a common consensus due to inertia. No contemporary writing of any kind about him or his supposed miracles exists, and nothing was written until decades later by Saul the rabbi and his jewish friends.

>>510825756
Every single one of your "sources" are either already debunked forgeries or just a text saying "some guys call themselves christcucks, they worship some yeshuah jew" 70 years after the fictional jew's supposed death.

>>510825417
>christcucks
Crawl back into the sewer. No ones owes you anything.

>>510825756
>But muh Tacitus!
Doesn't even mention Jesus
>But muh Josephus!
Doesn't even mention Jesus
>But muh Pliny!
Doesn't even mention Jesus. Does mention Christians, but who fucking cares, it's likely a forged volume anyway
>But muh Talmud!
Written 500 years later, who fucking cares
>But muh Lucian!
Doesn't even mention Jesus
>But muh Mara bar-Serapion!
Doesn't even mention Jesus
>But muh Suetonius!
Doesn't even - well, you get the idea
>But muh archaeology!
All dates to the 3rd century or later
>But muh literature!
All dates to the early-to-mid 2nd century, or later

>>510825746
John 14:9
Jesus saith unto him, Have I been so long time with you, and yet hast thou not known me, Philip? he that hath seen me hath seen the Father; and how sayest thou then, Shew us the Father?
>he that hath seen me hath seen the Father

The Revelation of Jesus Christ
Chapter 1, verse 8
I am Alpha and Omega, the beginning and the ending, saith the Lord, which is, and which was, and which is to come, the Almighty.

Genesis 1:1
In the beginning God created the heaven and the earth.
Revelation 22:21
The grace of our Lord Jesus Christ be with you all. Amen.

>>510825946
>Tacitus
Tacitus, writing around AD 116, refers to Christus who “suffered the extreme penalty during the reign of Tiberius at the hands of Pontius Pilate”. That’s a direct reference to Jesus. Tacitus was a Roman senator and historian, not a Christian, and therefore had no reason to fabricate this account. Scholars overwhelmingly affirm the authenticity of this passage.

>Josephus
Josephus mentions Jesus twice in Antiquities of the Jews. One passage refers to “James, the brother of Jesus who was called Christ”. The other, the Testimonium Flavianum, is debated due to possible Christian interpolation; however, most scholars agree that it contains a historical core referring to Jesus’ crucifixion under Pontius Pilate.

>Pliny the Younger
Pliny, writing to Emperor Trajan around AD 112, describes Christians worshipping Christ as a god. While he doesn’t name Jesus directly, he confirms that Christians venerated a historical founder who was crucified, consistent with the Gospel accounts.

>Talmud
The Babylonian Talmud contains hostile references to Yeshu (Jesus), including his execution “on the eve of Passover” and accusations of sorcery. While compiled later, these traditions likely preserve earlier oral sources. Even skeptical scholars like Peter Schäfer acknowledge that these are polemical responses to the Christian claim.

>>510825946
>Lucian of Samosata
Lucian, a 2nd-century satirist, mocks Christians for worshipping “the crucified sage” who introduced their rites. He doesn’t name Jesus, but the description unmistakably fits him. Lucian’s disdain makes his testimony all the more credible.

>Mara bar-Serapion
Mara refers to the “wise king of the Jews” whose execution led to the destruction of the Jewish kingdom. He compares him to Socrates and Pythagoras. While not naming Jesus, the context strongly suggests him. Scholars like Robert Van Voorst affirm this interpretation.

>Suetonius
Suetonius mentions disturbances “at the instigation of Chrestus” during Claudius’ reign. “Chrestus” is a common misspelling of “Christus.” While ambiguous, it’s plausible this refers to early Christian disputes about Jesus.

>Paul's Letters
The New Testament documents, especially Paul’s letters, date to the mid-1st century. 1 Corinthians 15:3–7 contains a creed about Jesus’ death and resurrection that scholars date to within 5 years of the crucifixion. That’s earlier than any source we have for Alexander the Great or Socrates.

>>510825946
The claim that “Jesus didn’t exist because we don’t see his exact name in contemporary records” is not just historically illiterate, it’s a category error. Ancient records don’t work like modern databases. You won’t find “Jesus of Nazareth, born 4 BCE, died 30 CE” in a census spreadsheet. What you do see is a tidal wave of early testimony, liturgical, epistolary, and narrative, written within decades of his death. Paul’s letters, dated to the 50s AD, quote creeds and hymns that predate him. That’s not myth-making. That’s living memory. And let’s talk about names. “Jesus” is the Anglicized form of Iēsous, the Greek rendering of Yeshua. The Gospels, Acts, and Pauline epistles frequently refer to him. Tacitus, writing as a Roman senator, names Christus, who was executed under Pontius Pilate. Josephus mentions “Jesus who was called Christ.” That’s not silence. That’s hostile corroboration. Compare that to Alexander the Great, Socrates, or Confucius. We have far fewer sources, written much later, and often filtered through legend. Yet no one questions their existence. Why? Because their impact is undeniable. And Jesus? His impact split history in half.

YOU are not flesh, YOU are a Soul
Your Soul possesses the flesh

God is the Father of all Souls
God is YOUR Father, not the father of your flesh.
Jesus is a soul, all souls are brothers, Jesus is my brother
Jesus is a "son of man" in that he possessed a body, just like I do.

If YOU love the father of your flesh more than the Father of your soul, then ye have disowned your Father, and he you.

If you love your flesh-father more than God, the Father of your soul, then ye are of the flesh, and ye shall have no Eternal life with God the Father.

Choose ye this day, do you want eternal life, or do you want to die with your flesh, your soul destroyed forever.

Jesus did not die so that you can sin.
1 John 3

Behold, what manner of love the Father hath bestowed upon us, that we should be called the sons of God: therefore the world knoweth us not, because it knew him not.

2 Beloved, now are we the sons of God, and it doth not yet appear what we shall be: but we know that, when he shall appear, we shall be like him; for we shall see him as he is.

6 Whosoever abideth in him sinneth not: whosoever sinneth hath not seen him, neither known him.

7 Little children, let no man deceive you: he that doeth righteousness is righteous, even as he is righteous.

8 He that committeth sin is of the devil; for the devil sinneth from the beginning. For this purpose the Son of God was manifested, that he might destroy the works of the devil.

9 Whosoever is born of God doth not commit sin; for his seed remaineth in him: and he cannot sin, because he is born of God.

10 In this the children of God are manifest, and the children of the devil: whosoever doeth not righteousness is not of God, neither he that loveth not his brother.

11 For this is the message that ye heard from the beginning, that we should love one another.

>>510827004
>That’s a direct reference to Jesus
FFS mate we have known since the 1890s that the manuscript has been altered
>Josephus mentions Jesus twice i
Fucking liar, no Josephus manuscript from before the 4th century contains any mention of Jesus
>Pliny confirms that Christians venerated a historical founder who was crucified,
Fucking liar, no part of the the "Pliny" letters describes any kind of historical Jesus. Mate, you haven't read any of these manuscripts have you
>While compiled later, these traditions likely preserve earlier oral sources.
So you say, now let's see the evidence for those earlier oral sources

>>510827036
>He doesn’t name Jesus, but the description unmistakably fits him
Yeah, it also fits L Ron Hubbard so who fucking ares
>Mara refers to the “wise king of the Jews”
Wow are you telling me anon that the Jews never had any King, not even one King, besides Jesus
>Paul's letters
Don't mention a historical Jesus even once
>1 Corinthians 15:3–7 contains a creed about Jesus’ death and resurrection that scholars date to within 5 years of the crucifixion.
Press F to doubt, but it doesn't even fucking matter because it's a description of a dream

>>510827074
>What you do see is a tidal wave of early testimony, liturgical, epistolary, and narrative, written within decades of his death.
You just quoted eight different people, none of whom provide testimony of a historical Jesus. Fuck off and stop wasting our time now, mate

>>510825656
Underrated, but shils would ignore this and repost this >>510824849 because they are spammers.

how does being a chrisitan /pol/cel even work?
Do you spend the week spreading hate and vitriol online then pray for forgiveness when you go to church on sunday (assuming you actually go to church)?

>>510827400
>Mate, you haven't read any of these manuscripts have you
They never have. Saulstians always ask us who don't believe in the magical jewish scp to be vastly more knowledgeable on their own book despite the fact they pretend to genuinely believe it's the word of a perfect, omniscient god. Sure, you believe there exists a book that can raise your IQ to 600 if you study it, but you're just not that interested in reading it, better leave that to the "evil heathens idol-worshipers".

All the saulstians you argue with do is type "jesus evidence" and repeat the same garbage literally thousands of videos on jewtube spout with the same forgeries over and over again, and of course the channel is always named something "jesus saves".

>>510827770
>Saulstians
I prefer to call them Marcionites, after all Paul's religion wasn't even Christianity until some kind of relunctant merger in the late 2nd century