Anonymous
ID: 5YYFbiZK
7/19/2025, 11:44:11 PM No.510835421
these people are SICK.
Replies:
Child porn isn’t illegal in India? - /pol/ (#510835421) [Archived: 289 hours ago]
Anonymous
ID: ZgY7Huby
7/19/2025, 11:49:23 PM No.510835781
thepublica.com apparently doesn't exist, it redirects to thequartering.com
So what's going on OP
So what's going on OP
Anonymous
ID: HWJqeFC2
7/20/2025, 12:02:01 AM No.510836716
>>510835421 (OP)
clearly what india understands and west does not it's better for someone to jerk off to a video than go rape a kid
clearly what india understands and west does not it's better for someone to jerk off to a video than go rape a kid
Replies:
Anonymous
ID: UmR5v8X/
7/20/2025, 12:02:48 AM No.510836772
wtf? I love Indians now
Replies:
Anonymous
ID: hdnmA3We
7/20/2025, 12:04:54 AM No.510836915
Sorry Timmy but your girlfriend prefers big brown dicks bitch guy
Anonymous
ID: tk+bsmgW
7/20/2025, 12:06:54 AM No.510837053
>>510835421 (OP)
Watching "American made" child porno is not illegal because you sick fucks can't stop making it muslims can't stop watching it
Watching "American made" child porno is not illegal because you sick fucks can't stop making it muslims can't stop watching it
Cats cradle
ID: kUyUjgPo
7/20/2025, 12:09:04 AM No.510837221
>>510835421 (OP)
Then don't go. Simple as. Do your own fuckin time.
Then don't go. Simple as. Do your own fuckin time.
Anonymous
ID: hyGz//FF
7/20/2025, 12:11:19 AM No.510837369
India is a silly place
Anonymous
ID: tHSo8LWB
7/20/2025, 12:17:03 AM No.510837781
Child porn shouldn't be illegal.
Especially if it's AI slop.
Especially if it's AI slop.
Anonymous
ID: zSG4ZfEy
7/20/2025, 12:20:28 AM No.510838019
Anonymous
ID: t3vml2uv
7/20/2025, 12:28:21 AM No.510838567
>>510836772
It was an interesting case, a person detained for suspicion of allegedly hording a lot of porn was arrested, police forensic found he had atleast 3 lollis and was booked under a special child protection act which denies bail/parole of any kind, he approached the state court and they said merely saving cp shouldn't attract case under special act, but then again case was appealed in supreme court and they ruled saving/sharing cp also attracts case under the special act
It was an interesting case, a person detained for suspicion of allegedly hording a lot of porn was arrested, police forensic found he had atleast 3 lollis and was booked under a special child protection act which denies bail/parole of any kind, he approached the state court and they said merely saving cp shouldn't attract case under special act, but then again case was appealed in supreme court and they ruled saving/sharing cp also attracts case under the special act