>Trump reveals “5 jets were shot down” during the latest India-Pakistan conflict.
Even POTUS has confirmed PAF claims, how will pajeets cope now?: https://x.com/clashreport/status/1946421052835541263

3 rafales
1 su-30
1 mig-29
5 all up

that was pakistan's originally claim. it was probably correct.

>trump
opinion discarded

>>510842728
trump remembers what they tell him during intel briefings, so yes, he's likely correct in the claim.

>>510842726 (OP)
Theyre all retarded street shitters, but at the same time the pakis have impressed me. Theyre supposed to be the most inbred country in the world with a consistently sub-80 IQ, and I recall seeing it often said that they wouldn't ever recover from their debt spiral, yet here they are embarrassing the jeets at every turn. Its clear who the superior breed of curry is.

>>510842727
1 mirage 2000
1 rafale
1 mig-29
------so far confirmed by French MoD-----
The other two might be
2 mig-29
or
2 Su-30MKI

>>510842727
We do not have any visual proof of Su-30MKI debris so replace that with Mirage 2000.

>>510842732
If I recall we saw two ejection seats

>>510842726 (OP)
>pajeets
I always thought pajeet means Paki jeet

>>510842730
IIRC Paki's concentrated all their brainpower in their airforce and benefitted from working with burgers when they were on better terms.

>>510842729
trump doesn't attend many intel briefings. trump prolly just watched some fox news and recalls that.
trump has repeated russian propaganda in the past.

>>510842734
pajeet is just a common name, like rajesh or vikram.

>>510842737
wrong. not an actual name:
>Pajeet is a racist slur created by supremacists in Canada to mock Sikhs who often have names ending with "jeet" (eg: manjeet, diljeet, sanjeet, etc )
>Paaji + generic Punjabi Sikh name (sanjeet,manjeet etc)= pajeet

>>510842736
>attend many intel briefings

>>510842726 (OP)
>Pakis weren't embellishing their achievements, they were telling the truth all along

Can't believe I'm feeling respect for Muslim jeets.

>>510842726 (OP)
was the list in one of the jets?

>>510842738
Sikhs aren't a race so it can't be racist? How is it a slur? Is it really insulting?

>>510842738
Pajeet means street shitter in their own language you fucking brahmin shagging benchod nigger

>>510842726 (OP)

Why did the Jeets do so badly this time around? Historically, they usually MOG the shit out of Pakistan out so badly it's not funny.

>>510842742
lmao

>>510842736
>trump prolly just watched some fox news and recalls that.

Or just repeating what the pakis told him. They proposed him to Nobel peace prize. They know how to flatter this retard.
And from what we hear since the conflict, there's a new interest in US-Paki strategic relationship from both side.

>5 jeet jets were flushed

>>510842726 (OP)
the poo people are still fighting?

>>510842745
Hundreds of pakistani officers are trained in places like US, China, Turkey. One of Pakistan's previous chief of staff and another Pakistani president were graduates on Turkish Military Academy in Ankara. Also, these countries provide Pakistan with high-tech stuff.

A slight advance makes wonders against street shitters.

>>510842745
indian political leadership thought pakistan wouldn't hit planes in indian airspace. so mission wasn't planned for that: indian fighter jets were only there for launching standoff weapons without looking out for pakistani fighter jets.

>>510842751
Also didn't expect that Pakistan's Fox-3 missiles could actually reach targets that far away.

>>510842736
it's reported that he listens to them. he just doesn't like reading them. he'll be parroting what they told him.

5 downed is also possible based on the wreckage and ejection seats shown.

>>510842745
>Mog the shit
Yes, but because the last major war was fought when Pakistan was an unbelievable pile of shit. They still are, but much better.
>>510842750
On the tech front - among the more self aware indians, they realise indian tech is a joke

>>510842726 (OP)
>how will pajeets cope now?:
James Gunn Superman broke box office records in india while Superman flop everywhere else intentionally?

>>510842745
They advertised the strikes for days, have no AWACS, and were expecting little to no reaction from Pakis.
On the other side, it looks like they managed to blow some shit up despite the losses.

>>510842726 (OP)
fake news.
trump literally says "four or five". watch the clip.

>>510842726 (OP)
Trump is not a reliable source of information on ongoing conflicts
What is his source?

>>510842726 (OP)
>pajeets
there's basically no jeets on this board coping about it though, the few that i saw was right after it happened.
what i have seen a lot of however, is chinkshills using the ambiguity of the shootdown's cause as a way to shill for their crappy hardware, and using the fact that jeets were the victims of these losses as a cover so they can try to dismiss anyone calling them out on it as a jeet.

considering how hard they're shilling for it, i doubt the rafales actually got shot down by chinese jets, otherwise the chinese would just show the receipts, more than likely they were shot down by F16's or pakistani mirages.

>>64002990
>nafo nigger
those are actually only on reddit and twitter, your home sites.
you should get out of there and go back to those places.

>>510842745
1. they're jeets
2. pakistan has a very good airforce with great AWACS intergration.

>>510842759
You're not fooling anyone pajeet

>>510842759
You're still coping, poojeet.

blame nixon

>>510842726 (OP)
What are the chances that he read that on twitter?

>>510842765
1-to-1
He's just another brainmelted boomer addicted to social media

Your president is a car salesman.

>>510842730
Almost as if chink shit is actually good and AI isn’t a meme

>>510842762
>>510842763
and there we go, right on time, chinkshills getting angry because i pointed out their behaviour.
didn't even deny there were jeets coping about it
didn't even deny they were shot down.
simply noticing their shilling efforts was enough to draw out their obvious response.

you will never be a superpower, remember that.

The Economist is confirming it too.

>India has yet to confirm it officially but this was one of a number of its fighter jets that were lost in a four-day conflict with Pakistan in May. The Indian government disputes Pakistan’s claim to have shot down six warplanes, including three of its new French Rafale jets. But foreign military officials believe that five Indian aircraft were destroyed, including at least one Rafale. And Indian military officers, while refusing to confirm numbers, do now admit to losing some aircraft. What is more, they are starting to indicate that the losses may have stemmed from Indian errors rather than technological deficiencies.

>Dassault executives are anxious to reassure countries that have bought Rafales, including Egypt, Indonesia, Qatar and the UAE, as well as potential future customers. But the company is constrained in what it can say publicly, for fear of angering India. It is also unclear to what extent Dassault has been permitted to take part in India’s investigation into the episode.

https://www.economist.com/asia/2025/07/16/how-did-pakistan-shoot-down-indias-fighter-jets

>>510842743
By this logic, anti-semitism is impossible.

>zero WVR or even evasive footage from this non-happening
>just jets lobbing amraams in the general direction of an enemy and running away the second it goes pitbull
Fox 3s ruined aerial combat, change my mind

Why did the dumbass mod put this on /pol/?

>absolutely abysmal level of discussion
This got dumped here from /k/ didn't it

>>510843189
/k/ mods get really upset if you say anything that embarrasses india or ukraine

>>510842738
Fuck you you fuck me bloody bitch basterd, thank you