>>510844904 (OP)>there was just something off puttingyou maybe tgot that feeling due to the 90s were full with "racial activism" and you'd have cliques making products that ended up being self-centered
Seinfeld might be one, but you should check out "black movies" with black people and exclusively black people with no others, no asians and no whites!
>USSeinfeld is a chronicle of a Jewish-neighborhood with all the stereotypical protagonists that you'd find in such a neighborhood
the problem is that the US would have you encode Seinfeld in terms of race whereas I have always perceived Seinfeld in terms of economical classes
I never found Seinfeld offputting, in fact, I've identified very very many times with either people or situations within the show because Jewish neighborhoods were traditionally poorer neighborhoods so the same themes and patterns could be noticed in any "economical slum"
it's just that I guess there is a degree of relativism of what "poor" means, with European slums being really bad compared to what "poor" meant in the US with communal housing
I mean, even in the 90s, living with an insane neighbor, a secretary, a 40yo virgin and being yourself a go-getter, all together under the sme communal living, was "poor af" relative to US standards
rich kids already had their own place by 20!