>>510899560They're sour on the part of the normies who think AI is the second coming of Christ.
Besides which, AI isn't a friend. It's mathematics in a microchip.
>>510903088>yes it is artificialIn the technical abstraction of artificial, every single thing in existence has been artificed in some way, whether by law of physics and chemical reaction or by the miracle of the magic monkey sticking his dick in a cheerio.
Should we exclude natural occurrence, we're left with the trouble of arguing whether mathematics are a product of man or an observation of nature.
Safe to say they're not artificial by the definition of "wrench goes clang, spark sounds bang".
>it is (intelligent) by conventional definitionsThe conventional definition of intelligence is accurate cognitive interpretation of objective repeatable observations.
Most times when an LLM is asked the same question, it gives you different answers, and the bigger the dataset is, the more confused it becomes.
The opposite polarity of intelligence is stupidity, a trait abundant within the realm of AI products. Almost as abundant as in a lot of its users.
People who get things wrong get scolded as stupid all the same, and as you can surely accept, not everybody is an intelligent being.
>a new sequence of words or pixels is obviously originalBy that measure a copy-paste of a jpg is original.
Explicitly since that's what generative models do. They copy, interpret, and paste.
>evolutionary algorithms often produce designs which humans can't analyze but which workIf a human can't analyse them, a human can't manufacture and implement them.
The fact that those designs get built proves that humans analyse it all just fine.
>>510904142You've accurately represented the problem, it gets things wrong and you can't tell what it got wrong.
What you're saying is the quoted bit:
>the sky is blue>"Uh no you fool the atmosphere is blue"