>>510898213 (OP)>its demoralizationI guess that term does apply on several levels but I feel it is a bit too vague and not entirely on target. We must start, in my opinion, outside of the arena looking in, who is playing tonight, who is in attendance, etc
So here we have an evil group, gubmint etc, gubmint wants complete and total control of everything, everything they say is a provable lie, and we have the benefit of historical discourse pointing to their motives being "our job will be complete once everything everyone knows is false". Then we have the plebs that defiantly refuse to see any truth and will only believe anything if it comes from gubmint.
So, back to demoralization, a demoralized man can be called spiritually broken. The concept of spiritually breaking something is synonymous with domestication. Anyway, that is their apparent goal but I assert that there is much more to be talked about here. For what further I have to say all religious bullshit needs to be suspended. Sin is an interesting concept, it has nothing to do with actions and everything to do with conscience. Follow 10 men with guilty consciences and you will find 10 men that "walk the same path" i.e. they will gave profound similarities. All negative emotions are sinful, fear, shame, self-doubt, misery, etc. But, also, theres many compound mindsets that are sinful, cuckoldry, shitskins cant break the law, etc. I mention them separate because they are objectively negative emotions are a more basic sort and "compound mindsets" are abritrary perspectives formed from a multitude of negative emotions.
Mind you there is the "I think logically" vs "they think emotionally" argument but that doesnt apply being subjected to emotions and not being driven by emotion are distinct things and not mutually exclusive, everyone feels emotion the question is whether they pay attention to it and whether they resist, and to what degree.