>>510910659 (OP)modern humans are a wild mixture of ancient hominids.
africans are homo sapiens plus homo erectus plus a small percentage of proto-humanoid (aka proto-chimps) which science officially calls "ghost hominid" to avoid being called racist.
american blacks are 20-40% white (mixed euro) but this hybridization has led them to be even more insane than africans.
in regards to "white" people:
the term has a spectrum of meaning ranging from meaning "ruling class anglo-germanics" (used in old europe) to "not 100% nigger" (used in modern america).
there are no "white people" in hominid history but there are "pale and blond hominids with blue eyes" (if that is what you mean) and modern white people's ancestry is is a mixture between red haired eurasian hominids (the most ancient and mysterious ancestors), blue eyed peoples from the ancient Neolithic farmers, and blond genes which evolved relatively recently in the central asian steps (that's aryan factor) - all of these ancient peoples looked differently from modern white people but their synthesis and intermixture over time morphed into what we now in the year 2025 call "white people" or caucasians. all these ancient strains have been almost perfectly blended because of 2000 years of globohomo (since Rome) but in some secluded mountain regions one can still find peoples showing more of these archaic hominid traits.
asians are one of the earliest humans to have migrated out of africa and they went through their own complex hominid synthesis in the south eastern area where they pushed the ancestors of the aboriginals into australia (before the landbridge disappeared).
interestingly enough finno-ugric, turkic, and korean peoples are what could be called inbetween hominid mixtures who soaked up a lot of gene material inbetween the euro and the asian hominid synthesis which is why they appear are asiatic but also have some euro traits.
anyways, tldr: hominid history is one big convoluted complex mess.
