I can't muh scientist seriously

How do you know it was 130 million years and not 100 million years? This stuff is a joke

>>510911953 (OP)
>An artist's rendering
I'm surprised they didn't make it brown.

>science
more like psyops

>>510911953 (OP)
They need to stay (((relevant))) to keep getting the funding.

Its all big lies. no fossils, no dinosaurs, no evolution.

Its all freemason taught occult shit. Satans lies. And the final pill, is you find out the earth is not a sphere twistin’ and turnin’ in (((space)))

>>510911953 (OP)
>How do you know it was 130 million years and not 100 million years?
read the paper

>>510912840
>the surrounding rocks were estimated that age
>how was that determined?
>because the surrounding fossils were that age
>how wad that determined?
>because the surrounding rocks were that age
>How was that determined?
>Because radiometeric dating
>Do you have an outline of the step-by-step radiometric dating procedure you used?
>No

>>510912840
>memeflag eating shit as usual
>>510913363
They’ve been doing this “we tested the rock we found it in” bit for so long I can’t believe people aren’t being defenestrated over this. I was a kid and instinctively knew this was bullshit the first time I made someone explain it to me

>>510911953 (OP)
More a problem with science news sites that exaggerate and misrepresent actual studies

>>510911953 (OP)
>carbon data
Carbon (radiocarbon) data is central to approximating the age of fossils containing organic material. The technique, known as radiocarbon dating (carbon-14 dating), measures the remaining amount of the radioactive isotope carbon-14 within a specimen.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Radiocarbon_dating

>>510911953 (OP)
>"scientist" literally just make shit up
Yes.
The most hillarious of them all are british "scientists".
Real scientists all over the world laugh their arses off at british scientists.
"British scientists said" is a literal mem among real scientists.

>in Scotland
here you go.

>>510912695
>They need to stay (((relevant))) to keep getting the funding.
>Its all big lies. no fossils, no dinosaurs, no evolution.
>Its all freemason taught occult shit. Satans lies. And the final pill, is you find out the earth is not a sphere twistin’ and turnin’ in (((space)))

This.

>>510912840
Bold of you to think they can read and aren't just using AI to help them do everything.

>>510911953 (OP)
>This stuff is a joke
Even worse, it is completely serious.
The foundations of 'science' are not scientific, they are occult magick.

The first 'atoms' were not seen by scientists in the 20th century; they were seen by theosophists in visions in the 19th century.

The purpose of 'science, falsely so-called' (have fun digging into that phrase) is to undermine the Word of God.
What came first?
Creation.
That is why they start there.

>>510912384
Niggersaurus already taken

>>510916871
My favorite part? Hilariously inaccurate at best, especially when compared to things with documented timescales.

>>510912840
he cant read
its why he linked an article with pictures

>>510913363
>cut 10 cm-thick ash layer with knife & spoon, keep sample moist
>blend rock into slurry, let settle, decant fines
>ultrasonically clean coarse fraction
>separate minerals using heavy liquids & magnetic separation
>hand-pick euhedral zircon grains
>photograph grains
>chemically abrade zircons using Krogh’s HF abrasion method
>dissolve each grain and load with a ^205Pb–^235U tracer spike
>separate U and Pb via ion-exchange column chemistry
>purify and dry down U and Pb fractions, load onto Re filaments
>run TIMS to measure isotope ratios (^206Pb/^238U, ^207Pb/^235U)
>correct for spike, blank (use: 0.2 pg U, 3 pg Pb), and instrumental mass fractionation
>do single-grain TIMS analyses to check if zircons are from one population
>switch to multi-grain fractions (≤10 grains) to reduce error
>convert measured isotope ratios to ages using standard decay constants
>use decay equations to solve for crystallization age (t)
>report final U–Pb ages with ±2σ uncertainty using concordia plots

>>510911953 (OP)
lol... the romans never had a calendar... they tracked time with x time since y died... and that was the romans, the most advance ones...
Basically, all history pre 11-12th century had to be recreated.

>>510913363
>cant into sediment layers

anon...i...

>>510915113
This. The dates on things like that have a margin of error baked in but idiot media shaves that off and young earf creationists use that to go "Seee! The earf is only 6 thousand years old! Now give all your rights and freedoms to the globalist pedophile fascists!" Meanwhile their twin sisters on the left wipe the blood off their mouths and dicks after raping and eating children to say, "muh global warming! We gotta give all our rights and freedoms to the globalist pedo fascists!"

>>510911953 (OP)
I see you are down with the clown.