What's your take on the pornography issue? Total ban, age controls, free-for-all? I think that we should at least be protecting young boys.

>>510960524 (OP)
I dont think about porn at all.

>>510960524 (OP)
would peel her knickers off and lick that shaved cunny clean. then lovingly suck on her nipples before going back down to her bumhole and licking like a dog lol. I would taste every hole on her body

>>510960524 (OP)
Heavy regulations, making it difficult to produce and distribute. Social education for women, discouraging. Social shaming for the practice and jail time for producers.

>>510960524 (OP)
Ban it completely

>>510960735
Unrealistic. Regulations that make production and distribution a pain in the ass and not worth it. That is the way.

>>510960524 (OP)
I will never stop gooning

>>510960524 (OP)

You're kinda straggeling behind.. ever heard of stable diffusion lad?

>>510960952
I have less of a problem with this desu. It's more decentralized and harder to push agendas with.

>>510960941
You may think that it's fun(ny) or that you're degrading women, but it's quite the opposite.

>>510960524 (OP)
Why does the CIA want to know my stance on porn?

>>510961422
We're not letting immoral people to Zion

>>510960524 (OP)
Objectively, it's kind of irrelevant. Countries which ban porn have the same problems with birth rates and gender relations as countries which do not. I have come to think of 'porn' as a non-issue. People who blame their sexual or other problems on 'porn' or 'porn addiction' are being delusional. Those sorts of problems probably come from low testosterone or fucked-up hormones in general from dysgenics, environmental toxins, etc.

>>510961596
You could attribute most things that people are suffering from to low impulse control. Porn, food, alcohol, drugs, even their political opinions. On the other hand, I'm not convinced that "we" shouldn't be minimizing damage, especially given that it's socialized and everyone's paying for it one way or another.

>>510960524 (OP)
Anything harmful should be banned. Which is all the anal, abuse, etc. shit that definitely hurts people.
The rest should be lightly restricted so it can still be accessed but it requires more than a box that says "Yes I am 18" to see it. Perhaps make it mandatory to have any device accessible by children to require enhanced verification.
>Porn will never disappear, but if it is controlled intelligently it can go back to being a social release valve instead of the current 'makes you lose confidence in humanity' abomination its become.

>>510962086
I agree with this. It's just reasonable. Even if it only seriously damages 5% of the population, why keep it around. And I think that it influences the broader culture as well, we can't deny that everyone's looking even apart from the addicts.

With AI image generation, the cats out the bag. Everyone can produce gb of whatever highly specific goon material on demand.

We're completely fucked.

>>510960673
>shaved cunny
This isn't the 2010s any more.
Also, she's brown so her poophole probably reeks.

>>510962436
That's good in a sense, I don't seek to reform gooners. Especially since they're not empowering the industry doing so. I'd prefer to protect the kids before they reach that point.

>>510962541
It's not good at all. The problem with porn isn't that it makes a bunch of corrupt people rich. The problem is that it destroys men's brains.

>>510960693
This. Shits out of control. What woman doesnt have an OF nowadays.

>>510960524 (OP)
Ban 3dpd porn. Hentai only. Normoids should suffah and concentrate on being tax cattle.

>>510962765
Matter of fact most normies would be more grossed out at your pic related than a gangbang.

They're not okay in their heads and we must help them.

I think it should be illegal for people under 18 to have smartphones. Sure they could view porn on a family computer, but it'd be a lot more difficult to get away with it and parents have way more control.

>>510960524 (OP)
You have to be hopelessly coombrained to give a shit either way. Addicted? Scared to death of pornography? Coombrained.

>>510960524 (OP)
Banning would make the proprietors market it as forbidden fruit.
Best to convince people it's an abhorrent crime against humanity. Then brutally prosecute and punish the industry and top players. Don't allow them access to manipulate the public.

>>510960524 (OP)
Total ban. Those that want to seek it out will have to go to the underbelly of society where that shit belongs. Down the seedy alleys where the brothels and all the other reprobates belong

>>510960524 (OP)
I only support porn that does not result in financial gains for real women. This is what I cal ethical porn: Hentai, AI Generated. My moral values call for total women ruination so real porn and any form of prostitution is forbidden. In addition ethical porn should always generate impossible expectations that real women cannot achieve.

>>510960899
>Unrealistic
Naw you can ban it
People will still produce and distribute it but it'll still be banned
>But how will we enforce it?!?!
Selectively like all other laws

>>510960524 (OP)
Remove it from the Internet, entirely.

>>510960735
>Ban it completely

You really think you are going to ban porn when every asshole that walks the earth has a video camera in their pocket with access to the internet? America can't even ban cocaine and that shit has to be imported from South America, ffs.

>>510960524 (OP)
Could there ever be an anti-pornography temperance movement in the same way there was one for alcohol a century ago? I’m not sure if there could be. I don’t think men would lead the charge.

I believe the vast majority of men, particularly those under 30, are pornography addicts. The average age at which boys seek out and find porn has been 11 years old since internet porn became ubiquitous. That was some time ago, and they’re all adults now (adults with crippling porn addictions, downright weird sexual deviancies, and so much ED that online Viagra pill mills have become a thing).

And we can’t expect modern women to do anything at all, ever. In this case it not only concerns someone other than themselves, but men as a group. So there’s no way in hell women are going to care.

And the only anti-porn voice is usually one of religious morality rather one of a mental health perspective. It’s gained some headway but could just as easily falter. Pretty grim.

>>510960524 (OP)
A world where everyone goons to hentai instead of 3DPD would be preferable.

>>510960524 (OP)
I will do nothing.
This country is toast. It's going to fall apart.
When it does people are going to loot.
They will assume most onlyfans whores are rich and go after them.
That's what happens when you put yourself on a list and brag about money.

>>510963417
Murder is banned and people still do it
You seem to be under the misconception that laws enforce themselves
It's all completely optional

>>510960524 (OP)
Total ban, kill all the producers

>>510961135
I'm an S-tier woman respecter

>>510960524 (OP)
I'm not interested in banning porn until hoeflation is reversed completely. Fuck off nofapfags

>>510960673
Israeli memeflag off-topic spam

>>510960524 (OP)
amateur porn is a genuine good for society
professional porn is satanic

In order for an agrarian civilization to reach maximum potential, female sexual opportunity must be minimized.

>>510964129
I can't even watch professional porn desu

>>510963634
>Could there ever be an anti-pornography temperance movement in the same way there was one for alcohol a century ago?
that spawned literal alchool mafias inside your country because people cannot be stopped from drinking. A similar thing would happen to porn, there is in fact examples of this like in Indonesia, porn is banned there and young men are incredibly degenerate with their repressed desires.

>>510960524 (OP)
In the near future everything you do will require a biometric chip that tracks you.
Age and identity verification for all internet use will be part of that. All your activities, your location, what you read, what you buy, all of it will be monitored. Social credit scores. Loyalty to the government. Wrongthink.
It's going to happen.

>>510962983
Maybe on /pol/, but most people want to ban it because it's pretty fucked up 11 is the average age of first seeing porn especially when you know it can negatively impact brain development.
Personally I think all you need to do is require creating an account with email verification and you can filter 80% of children, if you want to make that 100% you can require KYC but I've got mixed feelings due to privacy concerns for the rest of the internet. It won't stop adults but that really isn't my problem.

>>510960524 (OP)

total ban would be ideal but I don't see how it's possible, especially not without giving up a lot of already dwindling freedom for the internet. it would need to be criminalized to the extent that cp is now to really make a dent, but this would lead to some wild outcomes. maybe someone with some old playboy goes to jail for life, a couple who made a sex tape treated the same. not sure how an effective ban could be structured.

>>510960524 (OP)

>>510960524 (OP)
Boomerbros, is it true that when you were young, someone seeded every forest and every vacant lot with porn magazines for children to find?

>>510963417
>You really think you are going to ban porn when every asshole that walks the earth has a video camera in their pocket with access to the internet?
Imagine not having a solar powered, high-definition, large screen, live streaming pornograph in the current year

>>510960524 (OP)
No one has given me a straight answer on how banning porn fixes women. You ban porn off the internet, great, women are still undatable monsters, and don't give me some shit about how this will finally encourage men to rise up and take away women's rights because that is so laughable I don't even know where to begin.

>>510964848
when I got my first live-in gf I took my porns to the forest and left them there in a bag
t. Gen X

>>510965161
Removes cash flow from their economy, hence they can’t eat so much and get lean. At least you’ll be fucking lean whores instead of pigs.

>>510965161
>on how banning porn fixes women.
they don't want to fix women
they want to take away porn because it's a )(shitty) replacement for women
you are supposed to be so sex starved you serve women no matter how bad they become
simple as

>>510964582
I mean you can ban websites fairly easily from your country. It won't stop small substitutes from existing nor will it stop semi lewd content on legal websites existing nor VPN crap but I think if a country was to go for banning implementing wouldn't be too hard, its more of to what end do we want to commit to this and to what end will this set the idea on banning shit on the internet that one political group in power doesn't like.
>>510963417
On this, if a ban was to exist all you need to do is force all ISP under legal penalty to delist certain websites that are considered porn websites. Ex: if a website is 50%+ porn content it's put on a list and removed. This would remove the top 20% that get 95% of the views.

>>510965477
banning porn sites would just make people find porn on torrents like in ye olden days of the early 2000s

>>510965621
The old days was lan parties.

You will remind cursed to hell Israel and the Jews whenever you make home movies.

>>510965621
Probably, or could also make people turn to alternatives or just buy vpns. I just hear people saying banning it won't do anything, but in all likelihood implementing a ban would probably kill industry level porn, as now 80%+ of normalfags can't get easy access to it and would have to go out of their way to get it. I think requiring verification would probably do the same thing though with less potential risks to the way I want my government to handle things on the internet though.

>>510960524 (OP)

Regulate it in such a was as to make it impossible to make a profit off of it. Kill the industry and you remove most of the extremes of the problems.

>>510960524 (OP)
To all those that dont wanna watch porn, have them sign a paper that they wont, gove em like a 100 dollars as reward, and then if they end up doing it give them 10 years in prison. Then we wont have to listen to this nonsense virtue signal anymore. Just ban kikes from doing it. Onlyfans finances the Gaza genocode.

>>510960524 (OP)
Pornography is a feminist issue. If you go on female spaces, they talk heavily about pornography and wanting to restrict men from accessing it. The problem women have with pornography is that it takes away attention from women and they think it promotes toxic masculinity. They also believes it changes female standards even though that the value of women is inflated more than it's ever been.

Feminists have been taking action by pressuring porn bans and sexualized content bans. Women want total control over men's sexuality. Attacking porn is one part of that.

>>510960524 (OP)
age control
would fix the addiction for lot of adults too. Cause no sane person will register to porn site.

>>510964373
God damn, you monkey people are fucking stupid.

The issue is instant access to never ending internet pornography. That isn’t something underground criminal organizations can cater too.
>b-but muh dark web! Muh VPN!
Yes, about 95% of the problem will be solved so we shouldn’t do anything at all because of the remaining 5%. We won’t even go into the fact that a ban would cripple the porn industry overnight and video hosting services would cease to be profitable.

Actual human beings understand all of this and for us reading this is just redundant.

>>510960524 (OP)
It's pretty bad and something should probably be done about it. It's hard because parents don't want to talk to their kids about it and that's where the real change can occur. You can easily yell at a kid for playing too many video games but nobody wants to sit down and ask little Timmy if he's been cranking his hog too much. I don't think any kind of ban would work nor do I really agree with banning things in principal, but maybe there is a way to make it less financially lucrative.

>>510963352
Understand your sentiment but that's not how the internet works. Remove 99% of it and 40% would be up again in under 1hr.

>>510960899
It depends on what you mean by “regulation” or “ban.”

If it’s illegal to sell, but still legal to own and produce, is that a regulation or a ban?

I think the legal framework for doing so already exists. No one argues that prostitution is a constitutionally protected right. At the same time, the government can’t stop two adults from fucking. You have the freedoms to fuck; apparently it’s a god given right to do so. No one will stop you. But the government can’t absolutely stop you from buying or selling sex. There’s no question about it.

Couldn’t the same rule apply to porn? “It’s muh first amendment right!” Ok, fine. You can produce, film, star in, own, and Jack off to all the porn in the world. It’s you’re right. But you can’t sell it.

This is logically consistent with existing laws regarding sex.

>>510960524 (OP)
Hands-off approach. Offer asylum for all hentai artists so they could draw and animate freely. Stop censorship.

>>510966492
My state already has a porn ban. It's a joke and a mild inconvenience at worst. I'm still able to masturbate and you can't do shit to stop me dumb foid.

All it did was ban the mainstream porn sites. You can still find endless porn easily. It's very trivial because boomers and karen feminists don't realize how difficult it for daddy government to control something as free and open as the internet. Your anti-porn crusade will be a failure and won't fix any problems in society. Simps and feminists still don't realize women and gynocracy are the problem. And notice how conservatives and women NEVER talk about all the smut they consume online. Amazon literally lists and sells sex books for women.

>>510966492
The crux of the problem here is not a porn black market or illegal organizations, I mentioned the alchool mafia to bring up there will be unintended side effects, sorry for overestimating your ability to read between the lines.
> a ban would cripple the porn industry overnight and video hosting services would cease to be profitable
Again, not the issue, do you honestly think suddenly depriving young men of all porn will cause no problems? The video porn industry going bankrupt is of no importance, its just corporations, I'm talking about the impact this can have on society, corporations come and go. If its not Pornhub then its Playboy, if its not video its maganize, but having nothing at all is unprecedented. Society has simply gotten used to porn and if you take away all forms of it all of sudden who knows what will happen?

>>510967258
Women can literally buy smut books, like "50 Shades of Grey," which promote toxic relationships and reveals the twisted female sexuality for dark triad abusive powerful men. There was this catalog and database for all sorts of smut but I can't find it. Does someone have it?

>>510967688
>suddenly depriving young men of all porn will cause no problems
Why is female sexuality empowered while male sexuality attacked? I think that's the real problem here.

>>510967759
>Women can buy a vibrator and no one cares, but when I buy the Robo Pussy Deluxe 2000 with automatic cooling, twenty vibration modes, liquid management system, automated orgasm simulation, precise tightness control, automatic rotation, auto-lubrification, penis glans identifier, etc, I'M SUDDENLY THE DEGENERATE?!

>>510966616
>You can easily yell at a kid for playing too many video games but nobody wants to sit down and ask little Timmy if he's been cranking his hog too much.
Yeap. Surely is a factor. It goes full circle too because the real reason that parents are ashamed to have that conversation is that they don't want to talk about having watched it themselves to their children. This faux prudishness leads to increased degeneracy as is often the case.
.

>>510960620
This.
>>510960524 (OP)
Go wank to your favorite porn star.
What the fuck is wrong with you retards?

>>510967688
You can't take it away, just do a little fascist takeover (at least on a national scale) and promote the softer stuff

>>510968343
>Robo Pussy Deluxe 2000 with automatic cooling, twenty vibration modes, liquid management system, automated orgasm simulation, precise tightness control, automatic rotation, auto-lubrification, penis glans identifier
This literally doesn't even exist. Meanwhile almost every woman has a vibrator and 9 inch bad dragon dildo. Terrible femoid gaslighting.

>>510960524 (OP)
Execute pornographers when and where they’re found.

>>510960524 (OP)
Dude, I just banged 3 hookers yesterday in a row.
Took 2 50mg pills of Viagra.
The day before, I fucked an escort for 2h and a half.

I'm brutally fucked by porn.
It should be banned, maybe once you're old enough (like 26) it could be allowed.

It's fucking brain rot man. BRAIN ROT.

>>510968439
>What the fuck is wrong with you retards?
It's a bunch of feminists, women, and conservative simps that are in this thread. Look at how much this anti-porn shit looks like the anti-porn threads on CC to show for demonstration purposes

CC /b/res/251713.html
CC /b/res/229454.html

/pol/tards are aligning with rabid overly hysterical man-hating feminists kek

>>510960673
What time is it in Tel Aviv, Hymie?

>>510960524 (OP)
Our world is controlled by money, wherever there isn’t a profit there isn’t an investment.

Stop paying pornstars and producers and porn will go away on its own.

But obviously you can’t get this done without CIA and Mossad assassinating you so there isn’t really a choice.

>>510967258
Your state implemented an ID requirement with no penalties and you’re wondering why it didn’t work. Your confusion on what an actual ban would look like tracks.

>>510960524 (OP)
free-for-all. I don't care about some dumb whore ruining their life. Nor do I care about parents being too shitty to keep track of their kids. not my problem

>>510968544
>Bad Dragon
Those are for homosexual men. They’re very popular with trannies, not women.

>>510960524 (OP)
Just kick the jews out and the problem disappears. White man has no incentive or desire to produce porn

>>510963634
>so much ED that online Viagra pill mills have become a thing
this is because americans are overweight and circumcised. other countries where men are not mutilated and in reasonable health unsurprisingly don't have these problems

fix women and men will stop going for porn. when the average woman expects a wealthy 7'2'' doctor as a minimum otherwise you give her the ick then you know relationships are fucked.

if you ban porn then you need to ban all social networks as women are the primary adult content creators there

>>510969720
>an actual ban would look like tracks
That's the point you dumb cunt. An actual porn ban is impossible to implement. Who would implement it? It would require immense government overreach. Either you're a feminist, or a cuckservative that unironically is bootlicking the government and wanting tyranny and authoritarianism on par with China's Great Firewall now. That's fucking crazy and I just hope you're just a radfem. Then the stupidity would be excusable.
>>510970145
Yeah, keep blaming men, cunt. Homos, pedos, trannies, rapists, whatever. But never women. Women are innocent victims according to feminist ethos. This is why men don't take women seriously anymore. Go back to crystal cafe

>>510960524 (OP)
Ban the sale, distribution and hosting of pornography via the internet. Shut down the prn streaming sites and ban porn on OF. Prosecute payment processors that facilitate payment for online porn. By doing this we can for porn off the internet and back onto physical media such as magazines and DVDs that can only be sold via adult bookstores to people that are 18+.

I'm fapping furiously out of fear this whole thing fades away like a wet sticky dream

>>510960524 (OP)
Ban it, the kikes own the whole industry and push it hard as a demoralisation tactic.

>>510960524 (OP)
Total ban on porn artistic nudity is ok

>>510960524 (OP)
that's a man but pornography is pretty cool

>>510960524 (OP)
Ban porn, legalize prostitution

Porn is unironically far worse for society. Porn creates simps who worship the thots on their screens. Johns don't worship their whores, they get their rocks off and move on with their lives. Would instantly cure in incel epidemic and the imbalance in the sexual marketplace.

>>510960524 (OP)
I think the only people who care about the legality of it are those who make money from it and those who have an addiction to the technology that delivers it to them. No screen, no demon. Having a tv in your home is like letting a jew inside to make mischief 24 hours a day and that goes for phones and computers as well. Take responsibility for your own affairs and those in your community.

>>510963634
>>510964373
>>510966492
"Porn is illegal but still a multi-billion dollar industry."
"No one would ever sell it illegally! That's just nonsense!"
*two years later*
"Now that all pornography is equally illegal the median age of the average porn actress has dropped to 14. Material has also become more and more extreme as psychopathic mobsters now try to one up each other to be the most hardcore on the market."

>>510972102
>I think the only people who care about the legality of it are those who make money from it and those who have an addiction to the technology
Truthnuke
Some people wants the state to be their nanny/church. Something doesn't have to be good for you for it to be legal, this is what liberty and self ownership means
Don't be toddlers, vice exists

>>510970887
>An actual porn ban is impossible to implement.
Actual murder bans have proven impossible for thousands of years and we're still trying those. You don't need to eliminate 100% of porn, getting 80% would be both relatively easy and extremely effective in terms of reducing and eliminating porn usage. Making it illegal means that you immediately get to roll up anyone who files their taxes or uses the clearnet. The ones that remain can't get the main payment processors, they put web hosting at risk and they have to constantly be running ahead of the law, all of which severely reduces their ability to get and keep eyeballs. You couldn't have shit like OnlyFans, which means cutting off what has been the easiest and most productive way to recruit new "talent." Having legal support massively enables an industry and having that support removed massively reduces an industry, even if that industry manages to continue.

TLDR
Bring back shaming
And slapping in public

>>510960735
Make it mandatory that no porn can be shown unless all actors/actresses are wearing Groco Marx glasses and small hats.

God wants us to look behind the curtain, which is the screen, and see the children of Satan behind it.

>>510972432
>Equating murder with porn
Wow.
>reducing and eliminating porn usage
You can't reduce porn usage because you can't eliminate sexuality. Sexuality is a normal part of what it means to be a biological organism. Take it up with nature.

I don't know who raped you but your trauma is obviously affecting your politics. Regardless, at the end of the day you are advocating the government to do the dirty work for you. You are advocating for more government tyranny and control to advance your all ready out of control gynocratic agenda.

>>510963253
That's actually not a bad theory. Ban any profiting off of adult content. No one can be paid, no one can charge for content, and no advertising.

>>510972817
*Groucho Marx*

>>510960524 (OP)
Ban on all the porn and open the brothers. Those whore need to earn money in the old way

>>510970887
So you rather women go out and have casual sex instead of using dildos?

>>510973395
All prostitutes and clients also must wear the Groucho Marx glasses and the hats.

>>510960524 (OP)
Porn is the only thing keeping a communist revolution from occurring

>>510973734
The revolution in America was cultural marxist, and it already happened. Look around you.

>>510973734
Porn IS the communist revolution, retard. Or more precisely the "Trotskyite" revolution.

>>510966345
>quote by dworkin
feminists are not anti porn
they're fat ugly hogs butt hurt that men don't lust over them
but if a magic wand were waved and they were made thin and pretty they would leap at the chance to exploit the loneliness and weakness of men just like any other whore.
feminists aren't anti-porn: they're just mad that they can't get a piece of the action

for example:
/pol/'s favorite roasty was a model when she was young and pretty: she was literally paid to be a thirst trap. Exploiting sexuality for money. And now that she's hit the wall she is shrill and angry and butt hurt at men.

and Andrea dworkin was unbelievably hideous and gross.

feminist anger and spite is directly proportional to how fat and gross and ugly they are-- inside and out

>>510973675
I'm not the prude here. Anti-porn prudes are the ones that seemingly would rather men go out and be orbiters and desperate simps for pussy, rather than using porn.

Look around, nigga. The value of women is overinflated. Birth rates are plummeting. Most men are single because women have absurd standards, while most women are promiscuous and fucking around freely. But men are the problem? Lol

>>510960524 (OP)
It's completely degenerate, but adults should be free to be degenerate as far as they themselves go. Minors aren't considered to be able to exercise free will, at least from a legal perspective, so restrictions to prevent their access would be reasonable.
Just a like bar or restaurant has liability from serving alcohol to minors (and strangely enough, adults under 21), efforts at preventing porn distribution would be expected to meet some threshold.
Which would be gradually established through court cases, similar to the way car wrecks and serving alcohol works. Slow and inconsistently.

>>510974230
You think orbiting is the only alternative? How about fighting to the death against the people who made out societies into stillborn matriarchies?

When your Tower of Babel project's mask slips and reveals a Mouse Utopia it's time to take notice. Or you can die as a traitor to your own people. Your people.

>>510974033
You think fat ugly women don't get men or don't have simps giving them money too? lol

>>510974033
Women, and especially feminists act as a tight political bloc on par with zionists. Men don't have anything similar. Women support politics that benefit women. Men support politics that they believe benefit everyone. Women act like a tribe in this regard.

Knowing this, i.e. that women are politically selfish, what would be the most beneficial stance for them about porn. Keep in mind this is a big issue for women. Men don't give a shit about porn. Feminists openly argue how porn promotes toxic masculinity, exploits "poor and innocent" women, and makes women feel insecure because they feel they're competing with porn. But what's really going on is that women seek power and control. Porn takes away the attention from men they selfishly crave. Without porn to give men release (because women DON'T put out), men become groveling simps for women, desperate for release. Women gain more demand and attention. Remember that women in society already hold a disproportionate and destructive amount of power. But that's not enough for these anti-porn feminist women.

If you are a male arguing against porn, you have been manipulated into serving selfish female interests. You've aligned yourself with feminists. Porn is inconsequential to men. That's why it's not a major political issue compared to the actual important political issues men discuss. But for women, it's a central issue.

>>510974962
>Without porn to give men release (because women DON'T put out), men become groveling simps for women, desperate for release
Explain how simps exist now with how common and easily available porn is, then

>People ITT pushing Chicongo School lolberg values instead of The Moral Law
Bunch of brain donors to Usura.

People may not like old timey Catholic Christianity, of the unabashedly antisemitic variety, but it does provide the necessary heuristic to lead out out of these nitwit insectoid debates about the freedom to drown in vice vs tyrannical control by the jewish apparatus of government.

>>510974033
Porn acts to keep people in a state of arrested development. Michel Foucault's correctly concluded that the preoccupation with sexuality can distract individuals from spiritual or religious considerations. He said something like: 'We learned that is was impossible to force people to turn away from God (God, tradition, morality, etc...), but that if we got them thinking about sex all notions of God would scape from their minds, and they would not think about God anymore.' Time has proven him right. The turning point for the mass degradation of the population started in earnest with the "sexual revolution" in the 1960s. Before that (c.1800s), soul-crushing perversion was by-and-large the purview of the vapid and moneyed bourgeoisie. And, before that, of the landless (think, Paris and London) nobility & aristocracy enslaved to the money power.

>>510975285
>Michel Foucault's correctly concluded
You mean the pedosexual rights advocate Michel Foucault? That guy?

>>510975136
Oof, based
The lack of a body with moral authority is showing. The state can't and shouldn't be it. Something that accepts the flawed nature of man while providing community and reason to not drown in vice, as you said
We are not the enemy btw, we are at the same predicament

Porn is jewish

>>510975479
Isn't that what merchant social media is? A virtual body of moral authority? It certainly isn't a marketplace of freely expressed ideas.

>>510975129
>Explain how simps exist now with how common and easily available porn is, then
The value of pussy is overinflated. Most men are single because female hypergamy is a huge problem. Women have unreasonable standards while themselves offering little value.

As a result, men get desperate and grovel for a crumble of female attention. Take away porn and you take away post-nut clarity. Men will become completely enslaved to females. Men will be forced to pursue women instead of using an outlet for temporary release. Porn is like a pressure valve. The demand for women will only increase to disastrous levels.

What the segment of anti-pornsters that aren't feminist could argue, is that if porn was reduced and men were forced to look for women instead, the incel epidemic would get worse, men would suffer, and maybe men would rise up and be forced to address rampant female hypergamy and promiscuity. That's a valid argument from anti-porn non-feminists I could agree with. However, it is difficult to predict as it's a sort of accelerationism that will either make things much worse for men, or send us into a gender collapse that we could rise from. Anti-porn feminists are banking on the former. Anti-porn males that aren't manhating feminists could bank on the latter. Because we damn well know reducing porn will only make things worse and more imbalanced favoring women.

>>510975955
Add to that the LLM devolution with its Mandate of Molech.

>>510965371
Finally, someone with some sense in this fucking thread. These dumb zoomers think putting the cart before the horse will put things back to normal. It won't. There's a socioeconomic issue here that porn only serves as opiates against. Banning it will not only make things worse, but will make women socioeconomically stronger. If you think hoflation Is bad now, wait until you see when women become the sole arbiters of sexuality. I fucking hate Zoomers man, they get stuck in this purity spiral where they think they could bring back some kind of deus valt century.

>>510975435
Yes. I'm not endorsing the piece of shit; just saying that he correctly identified the weak link that has since been used to destroy civilized societies.
It seems to me that throughout history religion has been the way in which human sexuality was controlled and harnessed to further the strengthening of society. It was like..it built and preserved the hearth and fireplace in which the fire of sexuality could be channeled to further order and civilization. Come to think of it, religion seems to have mainly been directed to controlling and circumscribing the natural tendency of women to unlimited/unhinged tendency to perversion to the destruction of family and everything else. It provides women with the parameters of principle and morality which they seldom have by nature. Men can be perverse too, but they naturally have certain bounds by nature. Men by nature want to build stable and orderly structures, and that instinct naturally constrains (and subordinates) their more feral/perverse impulses. Women, not so much.
I posit that in all times and places, religion always has been mostly aimed at controlling women's unrestrained instincts, and channeling that chaotic energy into motherhood and the protection of their offspring; rather than the unbridled self-gratification to which they are on the average drawn to by instinct and nature.

>>510975129
There's probably less simps now if you think about it. A very significant amount of men historically likely raised children that weren't their own.

>>510960524 (OP)
Like drug use it can never be fully stopped. Even in places like Saudi Arabia it's still probably rampant, just underground. Porn has been with us since the caveman painting days.

I'm not sure it can really ever be stopped but it can be minimized to do the least damaged. It should not be worshiped by the culture as it currently is.

>>510976730
>Twas a eugenic belief system rather than death by an orchestrated, purposive spiritual alchemy coming through the tubes
Yes, that is step one. Now that you've stated the obvious you might opt to explain why you are bringing Foucault's name into several threads like an undergrad whose wold has just been shaken by the bureaucratic banality of evil. The way societal issues are framed and by whom weighs on the outcome of discussion. That's what an Overton Window is in politics.

>>510960524 (OP)
porn should be banned for browns since they are pornbrained rapists
just look at all the threads on here, they're watching hours of tiktok and porn and shit everyday.
also herbs

>>510977380
>Just do a little bare knuckle boxing. Don't do it every day.
Garbage in, garbage out.

>>510960524 (OP)
Enforce age controls by putting it all behind a paywall like it worked before the 2010s. Zoomers act like keeping free interracial cuckold gangbangs out of the hands of first graders is some unthinkable thing that is impossible to accomplish.

>>510960524 (OP)
Catch my son looking at normal porn. "Oh Thank God, he's Normal!"

>>510963352
People will fap to anything that they manage to sexualize. Instagram girls, someone talking dirty with their clothes on, erotic novels, asmr videos, drawings. You'd have to shut down every website on the internet and put most of the world's population behind bars.

>>510966345
This is also a good point. Porn is used as a scapegoat to hate on men for having one free and easily accessible sexual outlet. Feminists can't stand a happy man or anything that doesn't let them drain men of resources or get ahead by.

>>510970320
Even white men have a sex drive and enjoy art. Got nothing to do with jews.

>>510977636
Hey, I saw that skit on The Man Show too.

>>510960735
>Ban it completely
Found the woman.

>>510965371
The real way to fix women, and by extension, men and society, it to limit the avenues through which women can obtain ego-gratification, praise, adulation, virtue signal, and generally one-up other women (which by nature they hate as competitors). That means making motherhood and the raising of good children (esp. daughters) the most important value and mark of excellence for women. Today only their sexual value (devoid of procreation) gets them praise, and is the only measure of their success. Naturally, if that avenue is open and acceptable (and rewarded), all women will compete with each other on that level. Remember that women, unlike men, have all though time only been naturally selected on the basis of their ability to seduce. (If their tribe is conquered, women's only hope for survival was seduction and sexual competition. Their entire mentality was finely-honed to that sole purpose in mind; to survive and be appealing to the conqueror. This is their only survival strategy, their only evolutionary value. As such, they are naturally amoral, and sexually driven. Only religion and strict civilizational morality could hrness that to good ends.
tl;dr - make motherhood and family the only thing they can be praised for.

Truly I have no shoulder here to stand on.

>>510960524 (OP)
All phones, will start sold with child protection mode turned on and only be able to be unblocked by parents. That's it. That's literally all that was needed.

>>510960524 (OP)
Maybe some grandfather type legislation. Pornography produced before a certain date is allowed to remain. Newly developed scenes are to be expunged. This allows for the public to subconsciously ween themselves off porn addiction as there are no new scenes to satisfy self indulgence

>>510960524 (OP)
Dirty industry. If it was shrunk down to a size to be able to only house people that actually want to perform porn - so probably mostly amateurs - content would be less and hopefully people would consume less.
At least people should reflect on their porn consumptions.
Age restriction would be good, but doesn't work realistically. Children and youth should be openly explained, what it means, pros cons, disruptive consumption and unrealistic images.

Yeah, if it would be possible, ban porn in generral with exception of personal porn.
But then again, trading would starrt at second 0.

>>510978117
This already exists on the iPhone. It's called Screen Time. Keep the brilliant ideas coming.

>>510978117
Not even.
All phones ship with a child mode already, all parents that are interested in using it need to do is turn it on. The majority of the population are adults, no reason adults should be made to kowtow to a small minority of children by some state uber-parent.

>>510978537
It's a graduated argument for Digital ID. It's bait.

>>510960524 (OP)
I’m horny and want to fuck everyday. It’s not usually like this. Does it have to do with it being summer? Or is the goverment injecting my food with some shit?

I don’t watch porn.

>>510977763
>tl;dr - make motherhood and family the only thing they can be praised for.
Historically, all great civilizations (Rome, Greece, Persia, China, Sumer, Babylon, etc) ON THE ASCENT made motherhood, child-rearing, household management, loyalty to family, etc, the only avenue for women to gain social status and "upvotes." Religions maintained that order and low-key stroked women's egos in that direction (see Fertility Goddesses, "the Great Mother," the "Virgin Mary'" etc, etc.). Take religion away from women, and you've left them purposeless and, now, they only have "OnlyFans" left to give them that sense of value; intra-female status (which is essentially the only one that counts for women; men are only a means to an end) only measured by "body-Count," and "my sugar-daddy is richer than your sugar-daddy." Unleash any saintly women, you end up with a demonic Lilith; and a wrecked civilization. This is accurate.
Religion and tradition are a serious business, and men cannot afford to let that slide. That is why porn is so highly corrosive, it makes men forget to maintain that strict and evolutionary essential order, and when men fail in that one mission, all hell breaks loose!
Men, you had one job!

>>510960524 (OP)
back to the 90s, modern porn is degenerate

>>510978994
It's your own desires. No one to blame but yourself.

Why would they ban it? Did feminists turn against it or something? I thought sex work was real work?

>>510979447
Gaslighting.

>>510978994
Summer holidays may play a part yeah. Can relate.

Total ban of distributing content made with the intent to take advantage of human lust. Porn contributes to the birth crisis around the world, we need to get rid of it.

>>510979139
>Religions maintained that order and low-key stroked women's egos in that direction (see Fertility Goddesses, "the Great Mother," the "Virgin Mary'" etc, etc.).
Men, by nature are tied to the spiritual; women are not. Hence, men even without organized religion are able to maintain principles & order (dharma/natural law), and organize & build civilization. Women are not tied to the spiritual by nature; they must have a tangible (earthly) religious order on which to model their behavior; They need a religion revealed to them by men, to provide them the earthly guidance they crave and require to fulfill their function as mothers and wives. They need to be shown the earthly image of the spiritual order that only man can perceive, translate to the women, and gift to them so that they can fulfill their promordial role as mothers and wives.
Prove me wrong!

>>510979863
I don't believe that you know what that word means.
Justify the lack of free will and if you believe you're hard determined and irrational then it's been decided that you've lost this exchange and the next ones as well.

>>510978994
That's being normal?

>>510977601
>Enforce age controls by putting it all behind a paywall like it worked before the 2010s
what lol. were you just tech illiterate and too dumb to find porn before social media apps or something

There are plenty of "people" to blame but the solutions on offer are reactionary, i.e. feminized, in calling for legislation and/or technological mediation. Wholly foolish since your government owns the technology companies and benefits financially as well as by increasing its size and power inasmuch as it controls the sociopolitical and economic issues over which it exercises domain by creating them. You serve its ends in exchange for illusions.

>>510960899
>unrealistic
have you ever seen CP just browsing the web ? no. because it's banned. you ban a thing and it ceases to exist if not for an infinitesimally small number of perverts.
not exactly rocket science.

>>510979975
You don't have control over your desires, only over your behavior. A personal act of "free will" will not sate them.

>>510980449
lol newfag

>>510960524 (OP)
>Attached earlobes.

>>510979878
>Porn contributes to the birth crisis around the world, we need to get rid of it.
I doubt that it does how could you make this argument? Porn just fucks up the consciousness of people at a fundamental level, people are obviously better without it but impacting the birth rate? How would that work? It's mostly an economic issue.

>>510960524 (OP)
Young boys want to fuck, you aren't protecting anything. You need to protect the young girls from making stupid decisions that make them worthless later on.

Who do you think is taking advantage of the girls? The other girls, or predatory (((men)))?

>>510980566
found a specimen of the infinitesimally small number of perverts.

>>510980816
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=thJgU9jkdU4

>>510980142
You had to put in effort to find forums that had stuff that you were looking for, which could also be required to be pay-gated if they really felt like it.

It would still be putting some form of road block up. Are you ever going to completely stop it? Of course not, but anything’s better than the nothing that they’re currently doing.

>>510970887
the solution is to kill every Jewish porn producer and take control of the company mind geek and seize the assets the porn company holds,but the government cant be the one to do it cause they dont have the will or reason to stop them

>>510980449
Comparing a fringe serious crime that deviants engage in with human sexuality practised by billions of adults is disingenuous. Most societies cooperate to crackdown on the former, the latter is legal and acceptable in most places and almost impossible to regulate. Even if you tried it'd lead to a dystopia real fast when you see big of a government you'd need and how much you'd have to ban, from books to most websites to the entertainment industry or regular human interaction.

>>510981040
>effort
No, it was extremely trivial but I guess you were just retarded. To be fair, so is most of humanity so I suppose basic shit like that would filter a lot.

>>510979979
When you’re a teenager. After 25 it changes drastically. At least for me it did.
Also, itms common that your test drops once you get married and have kids

>>510979447
Can I have my bike back?

>>510981122
>Comparing a fringe serious crime that deviants engage in with human sexuality practised by billions of adults is disingenuous
ban porn and it will become a fringe serious crime that deviants engage too. you don't get that these are not social phenomena, these are legal phenomena. you ban them and they go away (for 99% of the people).

>>510981416
>once you get married and have kids
that's not a thing anymore

>>510979867
Only other time of year I get this horny is christmas. Want to fuck elfs throughout the entire december month

>>510981480
What’s not a thing?

>>510981469
Is your bike in the room with us right now?

>>510981122
> the latter is legal and acceptable
it's legal but not acceptable. try to show a porn image in public and you will be seen as a subhuman/unhinged pervert and people will call the police. A thing that you do alone fearing of being seen by others is the epitome of non-acceptability.
But yes, it's legal because the powers in being want this soma to be legal. The whole point is making it illegal.

>>510981720
Lmao

>>510981593
marriage is rapidly dying and so is having children

>>510981122
>lead to a dystopia real fast
ultra popular and healthy ideas like racism and antisemitism are banned and they've been contained successfully by ZOG for 80 years now (sad). banning unhealthy stuff is popular and containment is orders of magnitude easier.

>>510979916
The Eternal Story, as old as time itself...Man/Woman; Shiva/Shakti; Purusha/Prakriti; Nirguna Brahman/Jagat; Order/Chaos; Kether/Malkuth; Above/Below; Jason/Medusa; Heaven/Hell; Rider/Horse; Nuclear Scientist/Reaction Chamber; Camper/Campfire; Husband/Wife; Father/Mother; Boyfriend/Girlfriend; etc. The ride neber ends, Anons. Ride the Tigress. Never let go!
YOU HAVE ONE JOB!

>>510981843
Shame. You know what’s also annoying as fuck? Grandparents today spend all their time wagieing for the zog state. None of my kids’ grandparents ever has time to see them, because they spend all their time working. Why the fuck aren’t these old geezers retired?

>>510960524 (OP)
>I think that we should at least be protecting young boys.
No, keep jacking off goy. Its ok to sexualize little boys. They will simp for total whores and spend all their money on porn which we own.

>>510960524 (OP)
free for all
>protect
if you're old enough to be horny you're old enough to jack off

>>510982333

>>510979139
>>510979916
It's not the religion, it's just status. Hitler didn't need to ground femininity in fairy tales to get women making babies, he just gave them medals. A religion is a story for why motherhood means status, but it is just a story, not the only story.

>>510981472
Again i don't think you'd understand how tyrannical the govt would have to become and how expansive these bans would be if you try to define pornography and see how broadly you can interpret it. See >>510977644
It's like putting chains on humanity itself to quash all culture, get rid of creativity and punish people for wanting to experience joy and pleasure.

>>510973056
>>Equating murder with porn
>Wow.
Dumb or pretending to be? No functional difference.

>>510982506
Not THAT tiger you faggot! But, generally, yes, this Anon gets it. Generally...

>>510960524 (OP)
>What's your take on the pornography issue?
Stop giving internet accessible devices to prepubescents as a replacement for toys!!

Confiscate/brick the devices of idiots who give them to prepubescents and then complain if they watch porn.

We're not spaying and neutering the internet because you're to stupid to use parental tools or tell your kid no.

ban the lot of it. it's a rot than needs to be eliminated

>>510960693
>>510960735
Extremists
>>510962086
actually, enjoying your fantasies through porn will lead to less harmful behavior overall
>>510962619
oh no men can just jack off and live life instead of orbiting some Stacy for months only to be ditched at the first advance.

>>510960524 (OP)
As long as kids aren't involved or looking at it (and if theres no animals) then I dont care

>>510980449
I saw some a few times when I was young, like 20-25 years ago. But yeah I don't think I've seen any since then. Authorities seem to take it seriously when it's in public view. Which, honestly, is a good thing. I'm glad it's not randomly posted on /pol/ like it used to be on /b/. That said it obviously exists in private groups and networks, and the authorities don't crack down on rich people who produce/share it.

I'd gladly let CP producers/consumers get the death penalty, but when puritanical cucks start calling hentai and cartoon porn CP, I want to hit them upside the head. Imagine going to prison over drawings. It's distasteful but I wouldn't want to be lumped in with them just for enjoying a girl with small proportions once in a blue moon.

porn saps the lifeforce out of young men, it's the most powerful form of bread and circus' ever and we're all worse off because of it

>>510978994
>I'm thirsty all the time and don't drink
>I'm hungry all the time and don't eat
>I'm tired all the time and don't sleep
Have you considered watching porn? It can't be healthy to completely ignore your natural drives.

>>510965371
this. it's all a psyop
>>510970675
>>510977763
women are shitty by nature. the internet only made it apparent.

>>510980449
>you ban a thing [that most people don't want] and it ceases to exist if not for an infinitesimally small number of perverts.
FTFY.
Try banning something that people DO want, and you end up with Prohibition.
>Have you ever seen cp just browsing the web?
Have you ever seen cannabis just walking about?

>>510981415
Ok man, I don’t give a shit.

>>510960524 (OP)
Just ban sale or distribution. ( to include free distribution online.) I don't exactly want the state to form death squads to make sure nobody's watching porn or making their own shit for private use, I just want to make it as difficult as possible for people to have access to. Basically the 1990s norm of having to put in the work to sneak an occasional nudie magazine or Sears catalog. People are always going to find shit to fap to. And you can choose to call that "porn" if you're Puritanical enough, but i think the problem is mostly solved if you cut the head off the snake and kill the kike monopoly on it.

>>510983423
I still fuck twice a week. Once a week used to suffice, but not in the summer. I think about fucking all day long

>>510982649
>it's just status
Yes. Yes, it is.
The story does not matter...religion, primordial meaning, etc.... just give women only one tangible avenue to compete: MOTHERHOOD. SUCCESS OF OFFSPRING, FAMILY STATUS, BEING A GOOD WIFE, FAMILY WEALTH AND SUCCESS....
And, give them the real sense (and it's actually true) that, that purpose fulfilled, they have the only value that is eternal! In many ancient (successful) societies, women were given the important task of carrying-out key rituals (family or public) for obtaining the blessings of the "Mother Goddess!" The women lit the hearths, prayed for their families, etc, and thereby insured their families' status & success, and their own as holy maidens of the Goddesses, and ultimately GOD himself. This structure gave women a KEY and ESSENTIAL role in the success of their family, clan, tribe, nation, race and civilization! It gave them a sense of essential worth as the made men free (they could nag the Gods, and not their husbands) to take care of the day-to-day business of actually making things function.

>>510974962
>If you are a male arguing against porn, you have been manipulated into serving selfish female interests
porn is a business
that means they are making money through porn
only fans is directly giving money to females-- WITHOUT EVEN GETTING SEX IN RETURN

IT DOES NOT GET MORE PATHETIC THAN GIVING TIME, ATTENTION, AND MONEY TO A WHORE ONLY TO JUST JERK YOURSELF OFF

a man can absolutely argue against against porn without being a simp.
for example:
>porn should be illegal and classified as prostitution
>prostitution should be punishable by enslavement and then sold to the highest bidder by the state
>women should have no rights
>it should be legal to beat one's wife (i.e. if she gets fat or bitchy)
>monogamy should be strictly enforced by law
as a result simping would be dramatically reduced because there would just be no real need or motivation or demand or supply for it.

who's the simp?
the worm who jerks off and wastes time, energy, and money on prostitutes who don't even know he exists or the man who says that women should be property of their husband and men should be able to have sex for free with their own wife?

kill yourself, simp

>>510965371
what about so masturbation starved that they finally fucking man up and put females in their proper place cowering, chained, in terror at the foot of man?

>>510960524 (OP)
kill all kikes
lets see what pornography is left...
maybe we can live with that, who knows at this point?

I've just had this thought that we need rather draconian laws to limit our vices in atheistic societies. Whereas in the old days, good old religious shaming would do most of the work without giving the government infinite powers.

>>510983535
>women are shitty by nature. the internet only made it apparent.
Women are not shitty; only instinctual and earthly. Only Chaotic and easily spooked, and led astray. Without fences and gates, like horses, they will run wild and use the only attributes they have to survive; That is: sexual desirability. Like wild mares, they will seek out new herds and masters.
In all history, the ONE JOB men/males have ever had is to keep their herd of mares in check; for the greater good.
Yes the Internet made this all apparent; BUT, once apparent, the only question is: What will you do about it?
The KEY is THIS: Do not tell a woman that she is beautiful to you (like a simp)(they can find thousands to tell them that): RATHER, tell her (like a man) that she is MORE beautiful THAN all the other females. Then tell her why (best mother; best lover; best wife; best cook; best advisor; best gardener; best home-maker; best defender of the family, etc...(GIVE HER A COMPARATIVE MEASURE SHE CAN UNDERSTAND). Then she will look to YOU to give her a sense of worth! A loyal woman is a FORCE OF NATURE! Harness her and you will be like a KING!!!
You will be her Muah'Dib! The Emperor, the worm-rider! Her Shiva to her Shakti! And. dare I say, the Rider of the Tigress.

>>510960524 (OP)
I would ban it
For now everyone should educate their kids to watch what they should and not this tipe of shit

>>510960524 (OP)
Ban tailless women.

>>510961442
>We're not letting moral people to Zion
ftfy

>>510986655
This.

>>510984510
bro you can get porn for free. you don't even have involve any real women in any step of the process. there are dudes that make drawings. nobody seriously gives money to only fans besides boomers (hopeless bunch) and money laundering schemes

Your psychology is NOT like HER psychology. Understand this!
You (the man) want to be loved by ONE WOMAN. Simple.
The female, on the other hand, knows she can be loved by any man. What she needs to know is why she is "Numba Wan!"...why all the other 'wamen' are total whores and absolute shit.
["Numba Wan" does not mean she is loved by you, but why all other women are shit.]
She does not compete for your laughable "LAAV" (she can get that anywhere), SHE competes against ALL OTHER WOMEN!
She wants to know why you cannot love any other woman...the only acceptable answer is tat all other women are shit. Think about this. Think back. You will see that this is true.
This is the only way that she has to measure that she has "won!" the race of desirability against ALL OTHERS! Give her that firm conviction and it is a win-win.
DO YOU UNDERSTAND?
That's what niggers do..."ayo, ayo, ain't no bitch like you boo. Ain't no booty like yours, hoe. Them otha hoes ain't got nuffin on you. You my Qween, yo, Fr Fr no cap."
DO NOT BE OUTPLAYED!

>>510960524 (OP)
Total ban.

>>510960524 (OP)
>free-for-all?
This.

>>510986655
Lol. Fuck you, you furry/hentai/anime degenerate. (uwu. tho). But, seriously, tho; men are talking right now about important things, here. Come back later. haha. (uwu)

>>510962750
>1.4 million (under 1%) American women are estimated to be OnlyFans creators
>82 million (49.3%) American men subscribe to OnlyFans

DO NOT idolize women; just like you would not idolize wild fire or raw PLUTONIUM. Rather, apply science, self-control, safety protocols, wisdom...mastery...sobriety...
Only then will you harness the primordial energy that is "The FEMALE!"
Source? Trust me, bro!
My source is God, Shiva, Brahman, "the Source," common sense, Pourna, Shuntyata, Zen, and my experience. Fwiw. Lol.

>>510960524 (OP)
Total ban. Obscenity should be banned in public and the internet is public access. Porn is psychologically destructive and uses the same addiction channels as hard drugs. Use the same methods used to crack down on CP on all pornography. Sure there will be the occasional determined gooner who will dig and find it, but that is a much smaller problem than over 90% of the population being addicted to that rot.
>reminder that the Berkeley “””speech””” riots were just kikes fighting for greater ability to engage in psychological warfare against our people

>>510960524 (OP)
Every kid should have a v card
When you get laid the girl takes it and scans it as taken
THEN you can watch porn. Incel epidemic solved

>>510963253
Best answer in the thread

>>510987519
and yet the porno producers and whores keep getting paid and buying cameras and computers and lights and mansions etc etc etc
so you tell me then: where are they getting the money from?

only commies and leftoid women are against porn

>>510992075
idiots that don't know how to use adblock mostly

Everything was perfect before B.liar and (((new labour))) the heavily epstein linked abuser ring which is once again in government BY DEFAULT because nobody would vote for the covid hoaxing mega-thief conservative party.
Hard core porn = ten years in prison
Soft porn razzle mags available at newsagents (inside opaque covers).
Simple. Worked perfectly.
The execution of abuser ring organised crime organisations and the elites mouth-whores from MSM and (((news))) cannot come to soon.

No pun intended.

>>510960524 (OP)
Legalize all prostitution. Stop pretending it doesn’t happen and simply let it happen.
Christcucks btfo immediately.

>>510960524 (OP)

Give me a state mandated waifu (can't be fat or old) legally obligated to drain my balls minimum twice per day then I'll agree to not watch porn

>>510960524 (OP)
Remove age of consent, HEAVILY shame premarital sex and porn, let people of different ages socialize and let bonds form naturally so people marry. Also encourage marrying young, give monetary aid to new couples such as loans to buy a house and each child you have cuts off a % of the total amount so after 4 children the house is free (on tax money, taxes should be used to benefit the population, natives, and there is no greater good than new children).

Im into anthro so im fully on board with banning 3DPD. Hell let’s make it easy, just ban anything without a tail.

>>510960524 (OP)
Pornography was ok when it was only on paper and before the internet in general.
We had fun as kids trying to get dirty magazines and staying up late to see some tits without the parents noticing.
Nowadays, it's a huge time sink and huge demotivator when it's available absolutely everywhere and it can be a disaster for kids.
It shouldn't be banned, but it shouldn't be easily available either.
The problem is that what are they doing now it's just an excuse to start pushing us all on the slippery slope of total internet control and reduce our freedoms.

>>510960524 (OP)
Just go to a brothel, actual sex is different from gooning

>>510963997
Yuck, she has a tattoo.

>>510966345
>Women want total control over men's sexuality.
Why are tgey shch tyrant sluts attention whores?

>>510962086
lol giant homo detected

>>510973186
Is this an anti-semitism?

>>510960524 (OP)
Just do what the bongs have done, and require retards and tech-illiterate boomers to provide their state-ID before they can fap so the government can keep a record of their sexual fetishes, meanwhile anyone with two brain cells to rub together will still know how to get around it. In the end, not one a single less person will consume porn, adult or child, but the patriotic adults are now streaming their porn habits directly to the government.
This seems like a good model to me.

>>510963997
This cunt has a cute face, and looks hot in clothes, but damn, she is mid-af when nude.