>>510987125 (OP)
Being completely subversive glowie bastards and threatening to nuke the world when they don’t get their way might have something to do with it.
No wonder they have such close ties to Israel.

>>510987125 (OP)
Because they make jews and trannies mad

>>510987125 (OP)
they keep chimping out and invading their neighbours for no reason

>>510987274
Motivate your reasoning and how that's the case?

>>510987398
>invading neighbours is le bad

>now
lol

>>510987125 (OP)
dunno, they good boys, dindu nuffin

>>510987274
>NOOOO YOU CANT JUST DEFEND YOURSELF
>PUTLER KEEPS SAYING LE NOOOOOKS LOL
you guys are full on contradictions.

>>510987125 (OP)
I can not figure out what this war is about for 4 years now

>>510987125 (OP)
>Russia
>Bad

Normgroids get the fuck off my board

>>510987125 (OP)
1. Violation of International Law
Unprovoked aggression: Ukraine did not attack or threaten Russia militarily. The invasion was a classic case of aggressive war, banned by Article 2(4) of the UN Charter, which prohibits the use of force against the territorial integrity or political independence of any state.

Breach of agreements:

1994 Budapest Memorandum: Russia pledged to respect Ukraine's sovereignty and borders in exchange for Ukraine giving up its nuclear weapons. The invasion blatantly violated this agreement.

Minsk Agreements: Russia had signed onto these deals aimed at resolving tensions in Eastern Ukraine peacefully—but instead chose full-scale war.

Annexation of territory: The attempted annexation of Crimea in 2014 and later of regions like Donetsk, Luhansk, Kherson, and Zaporizhzhia in 2022 is illegal under international law. No internationally recognized referendum or legal basis supports these claims.

2. False and Contrived Justifications
Russia’s stated reasons for the war are not only unsupported by facts but also widely discredited:

A. “Denazification”
Ukraine is a democracy with a Jewish president (Zelenskyy) whose family suffered in the Holocaust.

While Ukraine, like many countries, has far-right elements, the claim that it is run by Nazis is absurd and propaganda-driven.

B. “Protecting Russian speakers”
There is no evidence of genocide or systemic persecution of Russian speakers in Ukraine.

Russian-speaking cities like Kharkiv and Mariupol were bombed by Russia itself, killing thousands of civilians, including Russian speakers.

C. “NATO encroachment”
NATO is a defensive alliance. Ukraine was not a NATO member at the time of the invasion and had no immediate path to membership.

NATO had not stationed troops or nuclear weapons in Ukraine.

Even if Russia had concerns, war is not a lawful or proportionate response to perceived diplomatic threats.

>>510987125 (OP)
>>510987680
3. Sovereignty and Self-Determination
Ukraine is a sovereign country with the right to determine its own alliances, political direction, and government.

Russia’s invasion was an imperial act, aimed at reasserting control over a former colony, disregarding the will of the Ukrainian people.

4. Massive Civilian Harm Without Just Cause
Russia has bombed cities, hospitals, schools, and power infrastructure, displacing millions and killing tens of thousands of civilians.

These actions cannot be justified by any reasonable military necessity or proportionality. They are war crimes and acts of terror—not self-defense.

5. The “Preemptive Defense” Argument Is Invalid
Russia claimed Ukraine might attack the Donbas or Crimea. There was no credible threat of this. Preemptive war requires imminent danger, which did not exist.

In reality, Russia amassed over 150,000 troops at Ukraine’s border in early 2022, clearly preparing for invasion—not defense.

In Summary:
Russia’s invasion of Ukraine is completely unjustified because:

It violated international law and multiple treaties.

It was based on false, disproven narratives.

It infringed on Ukraine’s sovereignty and self-determination.

It caused immense suffering and destruction without legitimate cause.

It destabilized global security for the sake of authoritarian ambition.

>>510987477
Jeez, I wish we had a Right-Wing NKVD here.

>>510987274
>threatening to nuke the world
When did that happen?

>>510987777
Every single week. You have not been paying attention

>>510987680
>>510987708
its always the finns...

>>510987680
Your copypasta is weak
Tranny faggot shill

>>510987970
>Medvedev shitposts on telly
>Westoids have mental breakdown and make a headline of every post
Lol
Doesn't change the fact that GAYTO has been the agressor in every single conflict it partook and supported and supports now ISIS in Syria massacring Christians.
Fuckoff back to plebbit groid

>>510987125 (OP)
Relatively speaking, Russia is a barbarian country at odds with a collection of faggot countries.

>>510987708
>>510987680
[USER ID: ANON54321]
[TRIPCODE: !PutinCopium]
[DATE: 07/22/2025 (Wed) 03:14:20]

>Ukraine did not attack or threaten Russia militarily

COPE. Ukraine shelled Donbas for 8 years while NATO trained their forces for a proxy war. "Unprovoked" my ass—Russia was encircled by NATO expansion for decades.

>1994 Budapest Memorandum

LMAO. The West backed the 2014 Maidan coup, violating Ukraine’s constitutional order first. Russia was just securing its Black Sea Fleet in Crimea (which was always Russian, btw).

>Minsk Agreements

Ukraine NEVER implemented autonomy for Donbas like they agreed to. Zelenskyy even admitted it was a stall tactic.

>Annexation illegal under international law

Kosovo.

>Jewish president = no Nazis

Absolute kek. Azov Battalion, Right Sector, Bandera worship—all openly neo-Nazi. Zelensky’s a puppet whose own people are cannon fodder for the West.

>No genocide of Russian speakers

my cousin in Odessa had to hide his Russian books in 2016. Ukraine banned Russian language/media and shelled Donbas civilians. But muh "democracy."

>NATO defensive

NATO bombed Yugoslavia, Libya, and trained ISIS in Syria. "Defensive" my left nut. They wanted missiles in Kharkiv 5 minutes from Moscow.

>Ukraine sovereign

Sovereignty ends where US State Dept/NGOs start. Since 2014, Ukraine’s been a vassal state laundering billions in "aid" while oligarchs get rich.

>War crimes

>remembers Mariupol’s Azovstal Nazis using kids as shields. Meanwhile, Ukraine bombs Donetsk markets daily—where’s your ICC outcry?

>Preemptive defense invalid

150k troops? Proof? Oh right, you trust the same intel that said Russia would collapse in 3 weeks.

**TL;DR:** West broke every deal first, cried when Russia called their bluff. Ukraine’s a corrupt meat grinder, and you’re swallowing State Dept propaganda like a good goy.

>>510988453
are faggots stronger than barbarians? weird times

>>510987125 (OP)
Because they invade other countries? Are you retarded?

>>510987398
>invading their neighbors for no reason
The US has invaded more nations than the Russians and for less legitimate reasons than the Russians, yet NATO doesn't see them as the bad guys...

As soon as NATO helped coup the following governments the FIRST thing they did was slaughter christians
>Royal Family of Afganistan
>Iraq
>Libya
>Egypt
>Syria
Plus women lost the right to education in most of them.

>>510988657
>invading other countries is le bad

>>510988750
Oh and
>Gaza
>Palestine

>>510988781
>somalians invading swedefaggots ass every night is le bad

>>510988486
>COPE. Ukraine shelled Donbas for 8 years
Donbas is Ukrainian territory.
You mean they were fighting a Russian insurgency in their Eastern Territory.
So countries don't have a right to their territorial integrity if Russia desires their land?
Once the Russians become fixated on it, you are obligated to either grant it succession (to become a Russian vassal-State) or just flat out cede the land to Russia?
And any form of military resistance to this inevitability makes YOU the villain?

This makes perfect sense!

>>510988954
It's an obviously computer generated post but if you really want to talk there was a referendum so it's now contested territory: we think it's ours, you think it's yours. Regardless of whether it's ours or theirs, them shelling it is no good.

>>510987125 (OP)
Russians are good boys
they didn't do nothin

>>510987125 (OP)
Because American sodomites said so ok

>>510988486


>Ukraine shelled Donbas for 8 years"

Yes, fighting occurred in Donbas starting in 2014—but that was initiated by Russian-backed separatists and Russian operatives, not unprovoked Ukrainian aggression. The OSCE documented shelling from both sides, but Russia armed, funded, and directed the separatists. If Russia hadn’t intervened covertly, there likely would have been no war in Donbas.

>Russia was encircled by NATO"

NATO is a defensive alliance. No country has been forced to join. Eastern European states chose NATO after experiencing Soviet domination. NATO never invaded or attacked Russia. Russia's claim that Ukraine was a threat is purely hypothetical—Ukraine posed no credible military threat to Russia in 2022.

>"The West backed the 2014 Maidan coup"

The Maidan uprising was a popular revolution sparked by Yanukovych rejecting an EU deal in favor of a Russian one. The Ukrainian parliament voted him out, including members of his own party. The idea that this was a “Western coup” is a Russian narrative used to delegitimize Ukrainians’ own agency.

>"Russia securing its Black Sea Fleet"

Russia had a long-term lease on the Sevastopol base and did not need to invade Crimea to secure it. The annexation violated the Budapest Memorandum, where Russia explicitly agreed to respect Ukraine’s borders in exchange for Ukraine giving up its nuclear weapons.

>Ukraine didn't implement Minsk"

Both sides failed to fully implement Minsk, but Russia used it as a stalling tactic too. Multiple analysts and even Russian officials later admitted that they never intended peace—only to weaken Ukraine diplomatically while preparing militarily.

>Kosovo = Crimea"

False equivalence. Kosovo was not annexed by a neighboring country. It declared independence after ethnic cleansing and war. The UN never recognized Russia’s seizure of Crimea, and no legal precedent equates the two.

>>510987680
all bullshite
even war witch Von der Leyen privately admitted Russia 2022 invasion was LEGAL based on Hague court 2010 Kosovo precedent
- not illegal to declare independence
- not illegal to have an outside country help you
Kosovo broke from Serbia
Donbass broke from Ukraine
NATO helped Kosovo
Russian helped Donbass
same same

>>510987125 (OP)
On the other hand Putin is a fraud for not trying to win the war, he never blows the Dnieper River bridges
he's partners with Zelensky in the slow genocide of white man Slavs

>>510988486
>Jewish president = no Nazis"

Ukraine has far-right elements—like every country, including Russia. But calling the entire Ukrainian government Nazi is ridiculous. Zelenskyy is Jewish, lost family in the Holocaust, and was democratically elected. Far-right parties in Ukraine consistently get less than 3% of the vote.

>Ukraine banned Russian language/media"

Russian is still spoken widely in Ukraine. Some Russian media was restricted after 2014—but mainly for broadcasting war propaganda, the same way Germany bans Nazi materials. That’s not oppression—that’s wartime information security.

>NATO bombed Libya, Yugoslavia"

Yes, NATO has engaged in controversial military actions. But these don’t prove NATO is not defensive—each operation was based on UN mandates or alleged humanitarian crises. Russia’s invasion of Ukraine was not based on any immediate threat—only speculation and pretext.

>Ukraine = vassal state"

Ukraine is a sovereign nation. Taking aid or advice from the West doesn’t erase that. If anything, it shows Ukraine is choosing to align with democracies, not dictatorships. Corruption exists, yes—but Russia is far worse in terms of state capture and oligarchy.

>War crimes by Ukraine"

War crimes allegations exist on both sides, but Russia’s are vastly more documented and systemic: Bucha massacre, targeting civilians, kidnapping children, mass deportations. Equating isolated incidents with a full-scale invasion and occupation is a distortion.

>Preemptive defense"

The idea that Russia invaded to stop NATO is disproven by their own actions. NATO wasn’t going to admit Ukraine anytime soon, and there were no NATO troops stationed in Ukraine in February 2022. Russia invaded because it saw an opportunity to restore imperial control—not because of an imminent threat.

>>510988486
tl;dr:
Russia started a war of aggression. All the propaganda about NATO, Nazis, and language bans is post-facto justification for what is fundamentally a colonial war against a sovereign neighbor.

If you’re defending that, you’re not anti-imperialist—you’re just buying into a different empire’s lies.

>>510987274
Who actually did nuke someone?

>>510987125 (OP)
A jew on the TV said so, and normies and boomers listened like the stupid dipshits they are.

>>510987274
>No wonder they have such close ties to Israel.
>Flag
Anon, I...

>>510987680
>NATO is a defensive alliance. Ukraine was not a NATO member at the time of the invasion and had no immediate path to membership.
defensive alliance, ahaha
>was not a member
while having a nato integration office at the fucking ukrainian government since 2000s; circa nato-ukraine summits 2005/2008
>had no immediate path
>hey zeleebina… can you please reject your nato application?
>NO I WANT IT! I’ll also develop nukes just in case
>Russia knocks in
>NAAAATTAAAAAAAAA CLOSE THE SKY
he got into it because he hoped to get bailed out

>>510991486
ukraine can do whatever it wants and only had popular support for joining nato after you invaded eastern ukraine and tired to coup their government. russians are the bad guys, you are the subhuman of the story, sorry

>>510991486
>Defensive alliance, ahaha
Laughing doesn’t change the fact that NATO has never invaded Russia, never threatened to, and never forced countries to join. The only countries that joined NATO were former Soviet satellites or republics actively fleeing Russian influence—for very real reasons.

>NATO integration office since 2000s
Yes, Ukraine has cooperated with NATO for decades—so have many non-member countries (like Sweden and Finland before 2022). That doesn’t make them NATO members or justify invasion. Cooperation ≠ membership.

>NATO-Ukraine summits 2005/2008
Those summits didn’t lead to membership—even in 2008, NATO said Ukraine wasn’t ready. From 2008 to 2022, Ukraine made zero real progress toward joining. Even after the 2014 invasion, NATO membership was off the table. So the "threat" was purely imaginary.

>Zelensky wanted NATO & nukes
This is an intentional distortion. Zelensky never seriously threatened nuclear weapons—he floated concerns in early 2022 about Ukraine's security guarantees under the Budapest Memorandum, after Russia had already been escalating for months.

The nuclear angle was not a policy—it was a frustrated rhetorical statement in response to Russia violating its past agreements.

Want to keep going? I can do this all day

>>510987125 (OP)
Because they're liars. And they lie about everything because they know they're wrong, otherwise they wouldn't need to lie about anything.

>>510991884
now give me an advice on how to send a ukrainny refugee back to the heat of the battle

>>510991884
>Want to keep going? I can do this all day
we know how inorganic ukrainian shills are but you can amplify this further, I’m not complaining

>>510987125 (OP)
Because they are racially inferior to Swedes

>>510992263
I accept your concession

>>510987125 (OP)
Because russians are racially inferior to swedes

>>510991884
NAFO rats are not finnish

>>510987125 (OP)
Russia had a boulevard to exploit just by saying the truth and be exemplar among europeans instead of that they still In their antifa narrative and corruption problems

>>510992346
what advice did the bot give about ukrainny refugees getting a ticket back to their glorious ukraine?

>>510987125 (OP)
CP is legal in their country. They're pedos.

>>510992346
>want me to go all day?
>yes i do
>i accept your concession
stick to your tribal ukrainian dialect, retard, you’re not cut for English

>>510987125 (OP)
In what possible universe are they the good guys?

>>510987125 (OP)
Attacking a weaker country and its people, killing civilians, bombing non-military buildings and targets, trying to seize land based on some historical claims, threatening to nuke the world, attempting a genocide and justifying it with the boogeyman of nazism, destabilising other countries and influencing their politics...
That's about it for Israel, next I'll be describing Russia.

>>510987125 (OP)
They're like the inbred bully trailer trash at school who needs to prove they're better than you

>>510989966
>jews cant be genocidal nationalist socialists

Whats an israel? Tranny faggot
You shills have turned half the world against ukraine with your propsganda

>>510987970
Ah, so you are just trying to argue that every time someone mentions nuclear weapons or the potential for nuclear disaster or conflict that's a "threat." Disingenuous and wrong, as I expected

>>510987680
>1. Violation of International Law
>Unprovoked aggression: Ukraine did not attack or threaten Russia militarily.

They threatened the russian minorities and declared war on them, including airstrikes against civilians. This justifies intervention according to russian constitution.

>A. “Denazification” Ukraine is a democracy...
Nazi Germany was a democracy too

>B. “Protecting Russian speakers”
We have video evidence which are available on RT, 1tv, sputnik media...all conveniently banned in the west.

>C. “NATO encroachment” NATO is a defensive alliance.

Out of a dozen or so wars NATO was involved in, none happened on their territory. It's not defence if you're engaged across the globe.

>Ukraine is a sovereign country with the right to determine its own alliances,

Not according to their constitution and declaration of independence of 1990, where the condition of independence was a blickfree status

>4. Massive Civilian Harm Without Just Cause
Collateral damage because Ukraine employed human shields and ISIS-like tactics.

>>510994065

>>510987274
fpbp, Russia and Israel sure are similar

>>510987125 (OP)
Ancestral blood memory.