https://www.news.com.au/national/politics/greens-cofounder-expelled-from-party-after-trans-and-queer-cult-claim/news-story/0f70e3e76e444557d1eb86da22b78cda

A boomer co-founder of the Australian Greens party has had his membership revoked by the new transgender administrators of the party. This begs the question of why transgenderism is the ultimate sacred cow of the (hard) left?
Given that they represent a tiny minority, how can these leftist parties ever hope to pose a credible political alternative to the status quo?

>>511008961 (OP)
Trannies were very clever. They managed to hack the leftist mind in the following way.

1. Be terminally online and make sure you get to moderate all the forums. Write an "inclusive" code of conduct that forbids "transphobia". Leftists all want to be kind and inclusive, so they'll agree. Little do they know they're handing all power over to you.

2. Have such an insane biology-contradicting ideology about yourself that literally any position can be called transphobic.

3. Simply enforce the code of conduct in any way you see fit, knowing that leftists will always defer to you. Now you can do what you like with your army of leftist tranny golems. Constantly recruit more tranny jannies to your hive and make them thought police.

Trannies capture leftist political scenes over and over again this way and nobody has ever caught on. They did it to Reddit and they did it to Facebook at the corporate level and they've done it to the Democrats and the Greens and they did it to UK Labour for a long time. Truly the jews of the internet.

>>511008961 (OP)
What does leftism mean to you?

>>511008961 (OP)
>Why does leftism ultimately end in transgenderism?

Socialisms/Leftisms/Progressiveisms all are collective dead ends.

>>511009404
Appreciate your detailed thoughts. But the problem is that this must surely weaken the power of whatever institution falls under the yoke of said trans tyranny. Especially, once they start purging out hardcore leftists. Well, now it makes me wonder if it is a sabotage operation to actually destroy these institutions.

>>511009418
Transgenderism, obviously.
Do you know of any leftist organisations that don't officially assert gender policies?

>>511009957
Leftism is meaningless to me.
But if it means transgenderism to you, your question can be rephrased as
>Why does transgenderism ultimately end in transgenderism?
and that sounds like a pointless question.

>>511010079
Yeah that makes sense. If leftism is actually transgenderism all along then there is no question to be answered.

>>511008961 (OP)
Something something dualism something something baphomet something something dark magick