>6. Anyone who identifies as a pedophile, or who openly advocates for child sexual abuse, whether in, around, or outside of the community, regardless of the time it occurred, will be permanently banned from the DarkPlaces community without appeal.
Loco-for-Loli Pedophiles (like: Richard Matthew Stallman, Jeffery Epstine, Jeremy Bicha of Gnome, President Biden Miritcia Kitsune, or (allegedly) Trump) are banned
hgfdsas
md5: 915ae796a15994575896283a7da4b9fb
🔍
They banned long-term contributor Mircea Kitsune.
https://www.deviantart.com/mirceakitsune/journal/What-went-on-in-the-Darkplaces-engine-community-893239953
>So what happened. To keep it short and mention the same thing I said to the Xonotic crew: In the middle of a test I was conducting in-game, I was banned out of the blue from the entire Darkplaces community in a matter of seconds, by one of the developers with whom 5 minutes prior I was just talking to about my code. The reason? Something I said on a social media platform years ago offended them, that's pretty much it. After 15 years of being in that community (if you count their Freenode IRC room), I'm banned out of the blue purely out of cancel culture over opinions I had, which I never brought up or imagined bringing up in that community to whom I was always professional. I was given no prior warning, no way to get back to the team afterward, not even told exactly what it was they saw, asked why I said whatever I might have given I even remember every past argument, not even asked if it's accurate or could have been some fakery from a 4chan / Kiwifarms type website looking to troll people. As far as the others are aware to this day, I simply disappeared in the middle of working with them for unknown reasons... other people there to whom I spoke privately the next day expressed the same confusion as myself.
https://www.deviantart.com/mirceakitsune/journal/SJW-attacks-moving-to-Xonotic-forum-893907971
>The madness lives on: As of sometime during the last days, I no longer have access to the Xonotic forum either. The reason is identical to what went on in Darkplaces: SJW's gone mad over something they believe I supported long ago elsewhere... once more without
Jeremy Bicha is welcome in Chaos_Esque_Anthology.
It doesn't pay anything though since it's a Free Software project.
But he's welcome.
YHWH allows child brides.
A right white people took from Jeremy. But at 11 he aimed to take it back.
RMS wrote the free C compiler.
Anyone is welcome to give free code: those Loco for Loli or not.
Christians who don't code but believe they get to control everything because of their god Jesus "defeated" YHWH are not welcome since they don't code. Women who don't code but believe they get to control everything because they have 2 million police at their backs are not welcome since they don't code.
Programmers and map makers and texture artists and 3d modelers and musicians are welcomed.
However they are all welcomed in Chaos_Esque Anthology.
Marry little girls.
cir
md5: 2424cb20817909a45ceb87f45e3f7c75
🔍
RMS wrote the free C compiler. (and the free editor) (and the free *nix tools)
>"The nominee is quoted as saying that if the choice of a sexual partner were protected by the Constitution, "prostitution, adultery, necrophilia, bestiality, possession of child pornography, and even incest and pedophilia" also would be. He is probably mistaken, legally--but that is unfortunate. All of these acts should be legal as long as no one is coerced. They are illegal only because of prejudice and narrowmindedness."
>
>RMS on June 28th, 2003 https://stallman.org/archives/2003-mar-jun.html
>
>--------------------------
>
>"I am skeptical of the claim that voluntarily pedophilia harms children. The arguments that it causes harm seem to be based on cases which aren't voluntary, which are then stretched by parents who are horrified by the idea that their little baby is maturing. "
>
>RMS on June 5th, 2006) https://stallman.org/archives/2006-mar-jun.html#05%20June%202006%20(Dutch%20paedophiles%20form%20political%20party
>
>--------------------------
>
>" There is little evidence to justify the widespread assumption that willing participation in pedophilia hurts children.
>
>Granted, children may not dare say no to an older relative, or may not realize they could say no; in that case, even if they do not overtly object, the relationship may still feel imposed to them. That's not willing participation, it's imposed participation, a different issue. "
>
>RMS on Jan 4th, 2013) https://stallman.org/archives/2013-jan-apr.html#04_January_2013_(Pedophilia
>Capachata: AP0XN
A Pox On.