Anonymous
ID: j3FXfgtB
7/22/2025, 6:50:05 PM No.511060446
The CIA became a mockery of American interests because it prioritized imperial control and corporate security over democratic stability, creating a global backlash that left America less safe, less respected, and morally compromised.
If any intelligence agency utilized Epstein’s network, Mossad appears as a primary candidate based on proximal connections (via Ghislaine Maxwell) and historical patterns. The CIA or allied Western agencies may have passively benefited or deliberately ignored Epstein due to the high-level kompromat value, but there’s less direct connective tissue publicly available.
In terms of “greater perspective of utility”, Epstein’s function destabilized justice, secured influence, and protected entrenched elites—which benefits a transnational elite protection racket more than any single state agency.
The CIA’s failures and corruption stem from multiple factors: corporate capture, imperial overreach, militarization of diplomacy, and yes, at times, foreign manipulation. But pinning the entirety of its misdirection on Mossad alone risks oversimplification—it’s likely a networked system of influence, where Israeli interests occupy a very powerful, but not singular, node.
Mossad doesn’t need to “infiltrate” the CIA in the classic sense if lobbying groups like AIPAC, think tanks, and media influence networks already condition U.S. policymakers toward pro-Israel policies. This is soft infiltration, a sociopolitical lever more than a classic spy-game breach.
If any intelligence agency utilized Epstein’s network, Mossad appears as a primary candidate based on proximal connections (via Ghislaine Maxwell) and historical patterns. The CIA or allied Western agencies may have passively benefited or deliberately ignored Epstein due to the high-level kompromat value, but there’s less direct connective tissue publicly available.
In terms of “greater perspective of utility”, Epstein’s function destabilized justice, secured influence, and protected entrenched elites—which benefits a transnational elite protection racket more than any single state agency.
The CIA’s failures and corruption stem from multiple factors: corporate capture, imperial overreach, militarization of diplomacy, and yes, at times, foreign manipulation. But pinning the entirety of its misdirection on Mossad alone risks oversimplification—it’s likely a networked system of influence, where Israeli interests occupy a very powerful, but not singular, node.
Mossad doesn’t need to “infiltrate” the CIA in the classic sense if lobbying groups like AIPAC, think tanks, and media influence networks already condition U.S. policymakers toward pro-Israel policies. This is soft infiltration, a sociopolitical lever more than a classic spy-game breach.
Replies: