Is having a moral compass a disability? All richest/most powerful people are complete assholes.

Best to barely care about anyone or anything. No one’s experience in the matrix is objectively better or worse, it’s all made up for the purpose of advertising.

>>511082349 (OP)
Yes, but only if it applies to your in-group (presumably whites).
They are hammer and anvil of success:
- group identity
- in-group preference

>>511082473
I stopped caring long time ago but am still quite a way from active scum behaviour

>>511082349 (OP)
Not if you confine it to your in-group (presumably whites).
The hammer and anvil of success:
- group identity
- in-group preference

>>511082349 (OP)
>Is having a moral compass a disability?

Yes.

The Jews that control central banks and social media platforms have created a world where advertising revenue is the principal form of money for people with a voice in public.

This means that you are not rewarded for doing good but garnering attention and eyeballs, creating controversy.

Disunity is profitable for the Jewish central banking system because it maintains the advertising world order.

The only way to combat this is to embrace Bitcoin and alternative currencies, where advertising is less important and Jews don't control the money supply.

>>511082349 (OP)
In small groups now, in larger groups yes. The most powerful people are amoral bastards because it is impossible to be a successful moralist when controlling over 8 billion separate morals. In your small family, morals are not a disability