Science refutes science. Science is finally settled.

>>511091894 (OP)
Sounds dumb, I never asked for some gay universe fucken get rid of it thanks

Science never said the Big Bang was the beginning. It always said it was the earliest back we knew anything about. Now there’s more science. This would be fascinating if you weren’t a moron.

>>511091894 (OP)
Dude, sciencebros have been telling you retards that the Big Bang wasn't necessarily the beginning of everything for years now.
Stop falling for clickbait.

>>511091894 (OP)
>so instead of a hyper dense thing it was actually a hyper dense black hole
and?

>>511091894 (OP)
first off, I've heard this theory already.
secondly, science was supposed to be able to be refuted, what we have now is called narrative.
thirdly all fields you cock-suckin' kike bloot-lickin' foreskin munchin' faggot

>>511092033
it implies that there may of been an entire universe that existed before ours. it also implies that there may be another universe after ours expires. it's all explained in the longer version of the barenaked ladies song the big bang, used by that fucking kike show with the insufferable nerds. I would snap the gay one's neck. why did god create him that way?
>all fields

how is this different from fairy tales exactly?

I mean yes, this is how new universes get seeded. It's Schwarzchild cosmology, fractal universe, Russian doll. The event horizon acts as a rake, that's why the first elements in our universe were hydrogen and helium (sacred geometry in the numbers of electrons). The barrier of our observable universe is the event horizon of our black hole. But get this: the infinite singularity our universe is racing towards? It's literally the non existent limits of your imagination, your consciousness. With each new universe, there can be evolution, growth, progress, adaptation, change. There's a map of the universe inside your body. If you're good enough to decipher the symbolism, you'll have a deep understanding of what the fuck this thing is.

>>511091894 (OP)
Ummm yes, that's how science works.
A hypothesis is formed if evidence supports it, and if evidence is better explained in a different way, that new hypothesis will replace the old one.