If the goal of life is gene replication, then rape technically qualifies as a valid reproductive strategy, no?

you see it in nature, orangutans, ducks, dolphins. Even in human history, war rape was standard practice. Genghis Khan has millions of descendants because of rape.

Not saying it's "good" "bad" or "moral", but morality doesn't matter to your DNA. If it results in offspring, your genes win.

So why does modern society treat it as uniquely monstrous? Because it violates consent? Life doesn't care about that. Even her body won't reject your babies. Besides women are stupid and doesn't choose the right mate anyway so no harm is done.

Jeet logic

Valid reproduction strategy? Yes.

Does it regress human society instead of improving it? Also yes

>>511112155
>Does it regress human society instead of improving it? Also yes
I think that is up for discussion. It wouldn’t necessarily regress human society if it is combined with modern technologies.

>>511111982 (OP)
>If the goal of life is gene replication
>Not saying it's "good" "bad" or "moral", but morality doesn't matter to your DNA.
>So why does modern society treat it as uniquely monstrous?
I don't know if you've noticed this, but for most people the goal of life isn't (strictly) "gene replication". You're trying to argue against a position that doesn't exist.

>>511113408
>but for most people the goal of life isn't (strictly) "gene replication"

An apple is red. That's not an opinion not an opinion but a fact. And your body entire purpose is to reproduce. If you don't reproduce then you are a failed thing. But the reason your body heals itself and your cells won't stop working is for the sole act of reproduction.

>>511113535
>An apple is red. That's not an opinion not an opinion but a fact.

>>511111982 (OP)
> is cheating valid? it wins you the game saar
in the short term, maybe

>>511111982 (OP)
Your brown arent you?

>>511113535
> And your body entire purpose is to reproduce.
this isn't true at all, nativist retard. we aren't germs, we're a society.

>>511111982 (OP)
it worked for 300,000 years

>>511111982 (OP)
always been

>>511111982 (OP)
Obsolete animalistic tactics, unfit to solve the problem of women's reproductive inefficiency.

Which is as easily solved forever through impersonal engineering and readily available infrastructure.

Specifically, by putting women into barns, where they will be bred and milked to the full extent of efficiency granted by human Zootechnics, and then unceremoniously disposed of with a pneumatic needle when their bodies are spent and unproductive.

>>511112155
>implying its possible to regress india any further
You dont have to worry about the consequences of your actions if you are already at the bottom.

>>511111982 (OP)
Worked for Gengish Khan, 1:200 of every man is his seed.

>>511111982 (OP)
Rape doesn't exist.

Any female will become WET and EXCITED at the prospect of one or multiple men, physically stronger than her, FORCEFULLY DOMINATING her and bringing themselves to orgasm, thus validating her irresistible beauty and by that everything a woman truly cares about.

It's just that they want to be raped by Chad not Sukdeep, so they go to court and abort the baby when some subhuman rapes them.

>>511112822
You wouldn't t have a society for very long if every man you meet can rape your wife or daughters

>>511115176
In 21st century rape is not a crime against someone who you raped their wife or daughter, it is a crime against the raped women herself.
>You wouldn't t have a society for very long
>every man you meet can rape your wife or daughters
Again depends on what kind of society.
And rape is a reproductive strategy doesn’t necessitate everyone running around like cavemen raping everyone else.

>>511113535
>An apple is red

not all.
lmao. ranjeet try to justify his manly impulses