Realistically speaking, how much time they have left?

>>511120813 (OP)
Funniest thing is, the ones who will be hit hardest after "The Collapse" will be these grifters pumping out garbage every day to their mindbroken retarded fanbase watching about China's "imminent" collapse
No more content 4u

Probably another few millennia. If I imagine the future, all I see is Chinks in my mind. Europeans? Americans? Oh yeah, they used to roam about a few thousand years ago. A branch of humanity that exterminated itself. A little hurdle, a blemish, on the empire of heaven.

So let's take it at face value, China is on the verge of collapse. Now what? They're all Han Chinese. It's not like they'll splinter off into little tribes of people, killing each other with 3d printer scraps and textile machines. The CCP dies, the infrastructure is already there and working, and there is a bit of a stumble. Now what?

>>511120813 (OP)
I can't believe i used to eat this shit up, nothing ever happens

>>511121104
the CPC is various factions already who have presented under a united front since the war. there would be political power moves funded by billionaires but there would be very little civil unrest of any meaningful size, just random local grievances. as long as the economy remained functioning and people had their jobs.
the chinese constitution has the CPC as the party of power and the other minor parties have a more or less fixed % of the share in the government, so it would just be a battle of the CPC or there would need to be martial law by the army until a new constitution could be written for whatever future form of parliament and government would occur.
the CPC failing to exist or failing to operate properly would necessitate a new constitution as no one has any authority if the CPC doesn't exist, so it would just be behind doors purges against minor factions and lots of arrests for corruption against slow movers. no one knows who would end up with the power.

>>511121378
such an event like the collapse of the CPC would put Xi in total charge as he is the head of the armed forces and also ceremonial president so taking away his CPC power would still leave him with military power to keep control.

>>511120813 (OP)
Well, US and the west in general is a civilisation in decline and something has to replace it and the only potential country is china so... I doubt they will collapse because of debt.

These 2weeks videos incidents probably will strengthen china internal spending and regulations, since they just execute the ceos doing this shit.

>>511121156
Literally 2 moar weeks fren, not just chang but everywhere. I've got charts that show it. Not gonna post them though.

>>511121443
I don't follow these things closely, but how to you square these articles with what you are saying?

https://www.zerohedge.com/geopolitical/all-eyes-beijings-annual-reshuffle-military-chiefs-amid-signs-xis-waning-power

https://www.zerohedge.com/markets/purging-top-chinese-generals-shows-central-military-commission-disarray

>>511120813 (OP)
just a few millenia. it's almost over

>>511120813 (OP)
just two more weeks

>>511121078
>>511122363
>Probably another few millennia
>just a few millennia
/pol/ being an hive mind confirmed

>>511121953
From your article
>Xi's high-profile crackdown on corrupt generals appointed by his two predecessors significantly helped Xi concentrate political power.
Do you not know that the paramount leader of China is almost always
>chairman of the CMC
>general secretary of the party
>president of the Chinese state
The only thing that really matters is the CMC, Deng was considered paramount leader without being in charge of the party or president simply because he chaired the CMC.

This is just as bad as indian media fear mongering and fake news

>>511120813 (OP)
>Realistically speaking, how much time they have left?
Not long, we're catching boat loads of the little yellow cunts trying to sneak into Aus almost daily now.

No biggie though. crocs love em.

>>511120813 (OP)
China has some serious problems.
Flooding is one. Their cities are all sinking
Infrastructure is crumbling
groundwater is all contaminated.
rivers and dams are silted up.
and much more.
It looks like their plan is to redirect water from the Himalayas into the desert regions of china to make them habitable.

>>511121156
You are expediting a Hollywood style collapse that happens over night. The two more weeks, attention span of a gnat, instant noodle mindset.
>>511121498
Yep two more weeks faggot.
>>511122399
And another.

>>511120813 (OP)
About 14 days

>>511120813 (OP)
2 more weeks you retarded kike migger

>>511120813 (OP)

>>511122473
No. but what you write is to my question given this:

>With this, some observers have speculated that Zhang is now in charge of the CCP’s military and that he stripped Xi’s power last year.

As an outside observer the net trajectory of China under Xi has not been positive.

>>511120813 (OP)
the only thing i can see harming china is a leadership crisis after xi dies, the typical suspects demographics natural disaster etc arent going to stop them

>>511122987
>some observers have speculated
Whatever you say, ESL.

>>511120813 (OP)
Ever time a Chinese building collapses 100s of Chinese scurry out of the wreckage to breed anew.

>>511121156
Things do happen, but usually locally. Imagine being an Ukrainian. Or an Iranian just a month ago.
The China collapse stuff however is just obviously cheap propaganda and sensational content filled with lies. Turns out there are a lot of people who get off fantasizing about other countries collapsing to feel they have it good. Whites are slaves being racially replaced as we speak in most places besides perhaps eastern Europe somewhat. The only rational thing for a Euro or American to do is a revolution, but we keep sitting on our asses while the cost of living soars and govts keep dropping in immigrants who feed off welfare. Let's keep going lol, violence is bad m'kay. Nothing ever happens until it happens to you, but by then it's too late to do anything about it. Chuddha shit is just solipsism.

>>511120813 (OP)
two more weeks

>>511120813 (OP)
all these channels are sponsored by the CCP
they're desperately trying to convince us that they are weak and are not a threat but nothing could be further from the truth

>>511121378
Yep. They got away with Tiananmen Square Massacre before. These weekly arsons aren't as bad. And the Chinese people aren't capable of any forms of revolutions in the first place. They've been morally ruined since Mao and would prefer to steal from each other than overthrow the elites.

>>511120813 (OP)

>>511123450
China's economy is doing so well they need more workers. All blacks are welcome to enter China and work at jobs Chinese are too proud to work in.

>>511120813 (OP)
Would worry more about the pedo elites in burgerland than chang

>>511120813 (OP)
>Realistically speaking, how much time they have left?
You won't know -- they'll just cover up the real toll as they did Sichuan in 2008. Albeit, Xi is apparently on his way out (ill health or soft coup), which could be a bigger shift than an economic collapse that the peasant class will break the fall of.