Thread 511197503 - /pol/ [Archived: 196 hours ago]

Anonymous ID: dnDw8b5/Canada
7/24/2025, 6:26:27 AM No.511197503
1739415602245871
1739415602245871
md5: b92df7b6f034e7a7255890511113c06e๐Ÿ”
What exactly is morally wrong with hypergamy?
It's better for the evolution of human genetics.
If you have chud genes, you deserve chud outcomes.
You should be happy for Chad.
Replies: >>511197565 >>511197593 >>511197675 >>511197695 >>511197747 >>511197759 >>511197823 >>511197978 >>511198019 >>511198120 >>511198212 >>511198735 >>511199911 >>511199984 >>511200014 >>511200057 >>511200207 >>511200246 >>511201143 >>511202168 >>511202225 >>511202306 >>511202467
Anonymous ID: CK/Qs+7+Switzerland
7/24/2025, 6:27:36 AM No.511197565
>>511197503 (OP)

Chad today can be Chud tomorrow. Environment changes constantly and so do the requirements which determine who is what.
Anonymous ID: jyOEMBoDUnited States
7/24/2025, 6:28:15 AM No.511197593
>>511197503 (OP)
It ends with total societal collapse for one
Replies: >>511198089
Anonymous ID: WcqYiHKW
7/24/2025, 6:29:39 AM No.511197675
$_57
$_57
md5: 25568161ac5099605f3cd1ffa9b398aa๐Ÿ”
>>511197503 (OP)
You lost anyway. An army of gigachad huwhites can't beat BILLIONS of cousin-marriage Mvslim BVLLS
Better luck next time niggerfaggot
Anonymous ID: 4ICTk7d9United States
7/24/2025, 6:29:41 AM No.511197677
1749762628427860
1749762628427860
md5: 975104a824edaf72e404a8ae8fc0615e๐Ÿ”
Replies: >>511198106
Anonymous ID: GqZHuD/iFrance
7/24/2025, 6:30:00 AM No.511197695
>>511197503 (OP)
the morality of it is irrelevant, practically speaking it goes against societal stability.
Anonymous ID: +58TdvH7Brazil
7/24/2025, 6:31:01 AM No.511197747
>>511197503 (OP)
>hypergamy
>only pick low IQ retard that beat them up or are literal shitskin
kek, nice try, faggot.
meanwhile high IQ is marginalized unless they join some epstein list or something.
if they focus on high IQ, I wouldn't have a problem with your argument, the problem they don't, they focus on retarded shit that is not even relevant in modern society or in more stupid shit like the whole poor little shitskin narrative made by kikes.
Is all so tiresome.
sage ID: x/eWXQR9United States
7/24/2025, 6:31:08 AM No.511197759
1703550027289244
1703550027289244
md5: 6e2c1ad0e4d0e247cf8f0e0cd45d0362๐Ÿ”
>>511197503 (OP)
>Natural selection

Retard detected
Anonymous ID: yK3WIPTFUnited States
7/24/2025, 6:32:13 AM No.511197823
>>511197503 (OP)
>It's better for the evolution of human genetics.
It isn't though, it leads to societal issues which decreases the overall fitness of that human population group, which will lead to it getting outcompeted by other groups (either human or non-human, i.e. nature). You can already see this taking place today in real time, conservative monogamous cultures are outbreeding and outcompeting the hypergamous cultures.
Replies: >>511198089
Anonymous ID: a8M1PyxpUnited States
7/24/2025, 6:34:48 AM No.511197978
>>511197503 (OP)
Yeah man, that's cool and all, but turn and face the wall now
Anonymous ID: GZAF/YnoUnited States
7/24/2025, 6:35:30 AM No.511198019
>>511197503 (OP)
What exactly is morally wrong with hypergamy?
Basically the part where this
>It's better for the evolution of human genetics.
Is not true.

It is a full reversion to the ape state. Africans are hypergamous. Look at them. Any people that adopt, enforce, and naturally tend towards monogamy blow past those who do not.

Women do not actually prefer the most fit men long term. They prefer short term survival, not building a society. That evolution thing you learned about takes millions of years and spontaneous events of systematic SLAUGHTER to actually happen.

ie: what china is about to do to everyone else.
Anonymous ID: dnDw8b5/Canada
7/24/2025, 6:36:51 AM No.511198089
>>511197593
>>511197823
Be that as it may, there's got to be a compromise between the societal collapse model and the other extreme of dysgenic arranged marriage breeding freakshow.
Replies: >>511198402
Anonymous ID: x/eWXQR9United States
7/24/2025, 6:37:07 AM No.511198106
1702604512687380
1702604512687380
md5: d46a51d1c67645a716c405667d360cda๐Ÿ”
>>511197677
Brutal truke, don't know how any sane individual can maintain optimism when reality is just so sobering and relentless.
Anonymous ID: +RAAFydZ
7/24/2025, 6:37:26 AM No.511198120
>>511197503 (OP)

Modern hypergamy is a product of gender marxism called feminism.
Itโ€™s main goal is to lower the value of men in anything, thus inflating the price of a cunt. Nothing โ€œnaturalโ€ about this.

It means that some land whale, or some uggo, or old post-wall hag is entitled to chad or any decent male.
Women with horrible genetics get to reproduce, women get pregnant after 30 (because before this they need to โ€œfind themself, riding a cock carousel) so they produce defective kids, thus damaging the human gene pool even stronger.

Also women fuck niggers, psychos, and hideous crackheads.

kys
Anonymous ID: TJyQd4qGUnited States
7/24/2025, 6:39:05 AM No.511198212
>>511197503 (OP)
Society is built off of things like monogamy. If you revert to the primal way of hypergamy then you do not have a society anymore
Men who are left out (a majority of them) will no longer want to contribute
Anonymous ID: CW6xEHAA
7/24/2025, 6:42:21 AM No.511198402
>>511198089
Female selection is dysgenic in most species because women tend to select for "survival despite of [x trait]" while men tend to select for "survival because of [x trait]". See: Fisherian runaway.
Or maybe you have some other explanation as to why humans have been around for a million years, but we only landed on the moon 5k years after switching to male dominant selection strategies?
Bottom line is, women are retarded. In all species in almost all decisions. The idea that whatever makes their pussy tingle is "good genetics" is only convincing to the neurologically malformed...which might explain why that idea has such a death grip on you.
Anonymous ID: hz//ZWxm
7/24/2025, 6:49:06 AM No.511198735
>>511197503 (OP)
yeah man, harems without paternal investment are a famously stable and successful social model
my favorite part are the succession crises after chad dies and his various sons kill each other for the right to become the new sultan and fuck his female half-relatives
Replies: >>511198829 >>511199084
Anonymous ID: CW6xEHAA
7/24/2025, 6:50:44 AM No.511198829
>>511198735
Kek literally. Total r selected death
Anonymous ID: a8M1PyxpUnited States
7/24/2025, 6:55:59 AM No.511199084
>>511198735
Truth. Also, muslim nations are famously genetically diverse, and known for having low levels of inbreeding.
Replies: >>511201802
Anonymous ID: Oy4xfW5uAustralia
7/24/2025, 7:12:11 AM No.511199911
>>511197503 (OP)
Hypergamy assumes men and women sleeping promiscuously, as a woman body count gets higher the chance of that woman divorcing gets significantly higher and it scales well.
Intuitively men don't like women with high body counts because the only way of assuring paternity is that woman sleeping with you only.
From the first statement our ancestors would of used their anecdotal evidence and pattern recognition to understand this problem and associated disloyal women with the behavior of being a slut.
Because we have this innate intuition about this particular case, this is our primal instinct in action (disgust with women w/ high body count) trying to assure paternity because paternity tests once upon a time didn't exist.
Your promiscuous sexual history creates a reference for fun in which you'll be competing to achieve again which at the individual level is an incentive not to be dedicated to one person, you can think about this in Freudian terms such as the ego, ID, super ego.
In this respect "ignorance is bliss" is true, because you don't know what your missing out on and that's a good thing.
If you want a society where Stacy isn't fucking you over for Chad and ruining your marriage, disincentivizing promiscuity can mitigate this risk.
Anonymous ID: wojFuAFkBulgaria
7/24/2025, 7:13:34 AM No.511199984
1479846891424
1479846891424
md5: 70e1492ced4284ca876ff15966d93b43๐Ÿ”
>>511197503 (OP)
I like how you conveniently ignore that 80% of women would be chuds too if they were born men.
If you're going to make the case for eugenics you should go all the way.
Anonymous ID: LZaMoQBxAustralia
7/24/2025, 7:14:12 AM No.511200014
>>511197503 (OP)
Civilisation is impossible without monogamy. The hypergamous utopia means devolution to warring tribal bands.
Anonymous ID: RKTGE48aUnited States
7/24/2025, 7:15:04 AM No.511200057
>>511197503 (OP)
Whatโ€™s wrong with using technology to clone slave women so every man can have his own hypergamy?

Weโ€™re bordering on technological freedom, so I donโ€™t see why people are so hopeless, except that they feel the need for society to be hierarchical in some way
Anonymous ID: RsQ0EBBGUnited States
7/24/2025, 7:18:29 AM No.511200207
>>511197503 (OP)
Because it's not conducive with civilization. Look at every single culture that didn't guarantee the chance to procreate via patriarchal one man one woman systems, they all got hard stuck in the bronze age at best.
Civilization requires people to be working toward the same goal, even if they're near the bottom of the hierarchy, and that's impossible to accomplish without some sci-fi nerve staple slave tech, OR binding their interests with the states via procreation.
A man who has no stake in the system, will never sacrifice for it, they will at best do the absolute bare minimum. That's just the best case, the most likely case is that many men start to actively sabotage the system for their own short term gain. Because why wouldn't you? There's no greater purpose for them to work in furtherance of, and their legacy will die with them while chad fucks tens of women, but can only realistically support maybe two of them in a world where society has broken down and it's every man for themselves.
Anonymous ID: fJ+rj78XCanada
7/24/2025, 7:19:08 AM No.511200246
>>511197503 (OP)
I don't envy men who are surrounded by manipulative women with no honor or loyalty. most people would rather take one loving wife over a hundred concubines.

>how many threads going on right now are about women?
>how many of those threads are demoralizing or stupid distractions?
>all of them, all fields
Anonymous ID: 0SCcQWiTCanada
7/24/2025, 7:37:31 AM No.511201143
>>511197503 (OP)
Chad can earn the GDP and fight wars. Good luck. So what if chad.is outnumbered 1000000:1 by Mohhameds.
Anonymous ID: +58TdvH7Brazil
7/24/2025, 7:50:52 AM No.511201802
>>511199084
They are know for their low IQ and mix-maxing.
You can suggest a kikery to replace a kikery, that's retarded.
Anonymous ID: 8ZAtX4w3Italy
7/24/2025, 7:59:16 AM No.511202168
>>511197503 (OP)
Obsolete and vestigial reproductive structures not up to date with the criteria of an industrial society.

Fortunately, it's as easily solved forever through impersonal engineering and readily available infrastructure.

Specifically, by putting women into barns, where they will be bred and milked to the full extent of efficiency granted by human Zootechnics, and then unceremoniously disposed of with a pneumatic needle when their bodies are spent and unproductive.

Leaving the responsibility of the continuity of desirable genes to unreliable petty social variables is absolutely unacceptable.
Anonymous ID: DyNaPH3LUnited States
7/24/2025, 8:00:25 AM No.511202225
>>511197503 (OP)
>Assuming the smelly clam knows best.
Moronic simps need to be beaten until they stop having opinions.
Anonymous ID: hwEIas3HUnited States
7/24/2025, 8:02:19 AM No.511202306
half life 2
half life 2
md5: 04cd675edb7eca7a56a617a1507ee893๐Ÿ”
>>511197503 (OP)
This is not a conversation or a question, this is a demon/gang stalker/combine phishing for humans dissenting against insectoid sexual behaviors in society in order to build a target list.
Anonymous ID: iANIp9a0United States
7/24/2025, 8:06:03 AM No.511202467
>>511197503 (OP)
>It's better for the evolution of human genetics.

Substantiate your claims