> Putin is holding back and would crush "nato" members in seconds.

In his speech, "Madyar" presented a series of theses, the purpose of which was to shock the Europeans. He claimed that four of his combat crews, located 10 km from a huge NATO base, could completely destroy it in 15 minutes, and that it would look like Pearl Harbor during World War II. And also that no tank in the world - including the most modern Western models - can survive a strike by a drone costing 400 dollars. "Madyar" raised the question of NATO's defense readiness for new threats. "What will you do if the Shaheds fly over Europe?" he asked the assembled generals. And he himself answered that he did not know of a single NATO country capable of protecting a specific city from 200-300 Shahed drones flying in seven days a week.

>>511208951 (OP)
"Give more gibs or puten will crush ur balls"

>>511208951 (OP)
>and that it would look like Pearl Harbor during World War II
probably it would, because Pearl Harbour attack was a failure that achieved nothing of importance strategically and tactically but enraged USA to get into the war and win it.

Every college in the world is humbled and completely changed by experiencing their own teachings when war comes to their campus.

>>511209051
"Madyar" tounges my anus.

>>511209051
Why are you enticing Klaus

is it "madyar" or is it "magyar"? make up your mind

>>511208951 (OP)
>implying Russia could return fire after week

>>511208951 (OP)

Yawn. Nato hasn't fought. Ukraine has. It is not a Nato member. Russia hasn't fought an airforce. It hasn't fought a synchronised land army. It hasn't fought a navy.

It fought its own. They were largely trained by?? They had mostly Russian weapons, up until any conflict began? When it began it wasn't outfitted or even trained for any duration and not under the same standing. It is not a member.

But the propaganda is stronger. Where it has convinced its plebs it is fighting Nato. Geopolitically is not that battlefield.


Every single one of these topics. Prepared??? It goes to nukes. Are Russia prepared? In the meantime it's a proxy. Look at that frustration. Ironically.

>>511209469

But Nato fought the battlefield of ideas, and won. They/Them will teach us the merit of

>>511209469
>Image
> >>511209469

Remember when the BUK paid for directly by Hillary Clinton shot down an airliner?

I do.

>>511209588

What ideas. Russia killing Russians. It seems ironic. It was Russia and now it's a war. A war Russia wants to be recognised for like Ukraine wants to be recognised for. Until what does the map actually read after? It seems like another case of containment. Clap

>>511209731

In your local community what ideas do you hold or espouse?

>>511209125
Peal Harbor was an intelligence success and probably emboldened too much evil.

Cointel was used to lure the Japanese into attacking a dead mothballed fleet in order to conjure up the American spirit and a new fleet through propaganda.

Good.
Im not fighting gay kike wars for rich pedophiles.

>>511209807

>>511210242

It's totally different. I got moved to propaganda because my dick got blown off not all my extremities. Also I was smarter first so my propaganda role is more like an Electric Moped and we don't have to have hired drivers in the white cars.

>>511209807

Those are not my ideas. I have no problem with Russia being Russia. But I find it ironic it needed to gain recognition for it.

The danger of course is it becomes the topic, and in this turning point who knows what occurs today.

It is as big a predicament for Russia. If it leaves parts or if perhaps it takes all, any ideas are bound to resurface.

>papertiger stonk
sure, now drown yourself in cheap rubbing alcohol like every day