why do democrats want to see child porn so bad????

They like to see what their tax dollars pay for

The bipartisan Epstein Files Transparency Act does not require the Justice Department to release child porn. It permits them to redact documents so they don't contain CP or the personal identifiable information of victims. However:

>No record shall be withheld, delayed, or redacted on the basis of any of the following:
>(1) Embarrassment, reputational harm, or political sensitivity, including to any government official, public figure, or foreign dignitary

https://massie.house.gov/uploadedfiles/efta.pdf

It's common sense. The victims get protected. Government officials who raped kids don't get protected. And no one has to look at a photo or video of a kid getting raped.

>>511211655 (OP)
Disingenuous and brown

>>511211655 (OP)

it's such a strange take. child porn is prosecuted all the time without the videos being made fully public. that's all anyone wants. Are people using this argument suggesting that child porn shouldn't be prosecuted?

>>511211655 (OP)

>>511212704
>white

he would never rape a kid