If a Fetus is a person, and the pregnancy threatens the life of the mother, then abortion falls under stand your ground laws.

>>511230073 (OP)
so smart, dude

>>511230073 (OP)
good thing that doesnt happen even a fraction of the amount of time foids and leftoids claim it does and even states that restrict abortion still have mechanisms in place to allow it if it truly does threaten the mothers life.

>>511230716
It's effectively only relevant for tubal (ectopic) pregnancies, where the embryo already has no chance of survival.

>>511230716
Pregnancy issues are caused by the health of the mother and are pretty predictable.

>>511230073 (OP)
Jeffrey epstein owns you lil man lol.

>>511230073 (OP)
Considering women commit the equivalent of the holocaust every year, we should be trying them for war crimes.

>>511230073 (OP)
If you took any decent parent (or perspective parent) and gave them a choice your life or the kid's, the parent would choose to sacrifice themselves. Only a monster would put themselves above their own child

>>511230073 (OP)
>I am threatened by your existence
very jewish post

>>511230073 (OP)
If the mother is literally incapable of having a child then what good is she? If she can't even fucking birth a single baby then she was fucked either way. Abortion merely enables terrible people to continue making terrible life decisions.

>>511230073 (OP)
still gay

>>511230073 (OP)
I've never had an issue with abortion when it's a sincere threat to the life of the mother in a real and immediate physical health sort of way. Severe congenital deformities where a child assuredly wouldn't survive long are even something I'm flexible on, though less sure of. To make somone carry a child who'd die before ever leaving the hospital becuase their heart is on the outside or something would be a tragedy ontop of another tragedy. At will aboritions becuase somone simply doesn't want a child and "isn't ready" however are all murder. If you're gonna try to say if one thing qualifies as stand your ground than a threat to livelyhood does as well I call bullshit becuase they knew the terms of the contract. If you make a bad deal and it threatens your life you have a right to defense, if you make a bad deal and it costs you financially those are just the terms of the contract and you have an obligation to uphold them. It's neither theft nor trespass when you accepted the terms.

>>511230073 (OP)
>i love niggers
I don't. I am an excellent progressive eugenicist, you're a mediocre human rights loser.

>>511232102
>when it's a sincere threat to the life of the mother
Thats the problem.
Society hit that slippery slope and now a woman's emotional stress from "being firced to have a child" IS the threat to her life.

Still awaiting our alien overlords to cleanse this world.

>>511231411
Riddle me this!

Of the population I’m a percent less than 10, but babies seem to die again and again. Despite my small number, you’d be shocked to see that 33% were killed solely by me.

WHO AM I?

>>511230073 (OP)
So do vaccine mandates but honk honk nigger

>>511230073 (OP)
>If a Fetus is a person, and the pregnancy threatens the life of the mother, then abortion falls under stand your ground laws.
Cool story. Guess how many times that's happened IN ALL OF HUMAN HISTORY now.

a Fetus is a ward of the state
>has more rights than its bearer