If Africans are so violent then why aren't there any international wars in their continent like the Russo Ukraine war and Iran Iraq war? We only see proxy wars, civil wars, gang wars, but never any actual wars between nations.

Can't organize on a bigger scale, you know

Yeah true, there are no larger conflicts but there is always ongoing warfare, unlike most of America.

>>511264209
Nigeria can easily conquer Benin if it wanted to. There is nothing stopping them from acting like Russia.

>>511264094 (OP)
There are.

>>511264094 (OP)
>if they are so violent....
>we see proxy wars, civil wars, gang wars
and you see them every day + killing civilians, beating wives, torture, rape, islamic fundamentalists and so on.
>if there is so much violence.... why is there so much violence
huh

>>511264094 (OP)
they’re pretty good at committing mass genocide

need logistics to force project
african logistics is shovel + pickup truck with 60 year old mg + rape

>>511264094 (OP)
They don't have money to send troops over to fight.
There are multiple wars happening because of territory.
Boko haram is trying to instate a impire in the congo, south sudan is a separatist state from sudan and they have border conflicts, etc etc

>>511264996
Those are civil wars
>>511265297
Those type of wars don't really have high casualty counts like we see in international wars and are generally in a lower scale.

>>511264094 (OP)
Rwanda was just actively invading the DRC not long ago, along with all of the civil wars and islamic insurgencies going on, wtf are you talking about

>>511264094 (OP)
>why aren't there
literally incapable of organizing in sufficient size to conduct large scale warfare
instead, they simply kill each other in the streets on the individual and tribal level

>>511264094 (OP)
In order to engage in cross-border warfare, you need to have a semblance of organization. Most African countries are defined by having "central government controlled areas" and "militia controlled areas".

Furthermore, no African nation wants to engage in aggression because doing so means the humanitarian gibs dry up immediately. So when they have beef with each other, what they do instead is to fund militians action in their enemy's borders, so they can keep plausible deniability.

If you want a practical example of this, see Ruwanda's aggression on the DRC.

>>511265888
>>511265919
What's stopping Nigeria from zerg rushing Benin? Logistics doesn't really matter when there is an overwhelming difference in population
>>511266107
I would argue that was more of a proxy war

>>511264094 (OP)
There's literally like 8 different international conflicts going on right now.

>>511266246
They organize armies when they have civil wars though
>>511266326
This answer falls apart when we consider that Africans don't really care about consequences. Logically speaking there should be multiple wars of aggression happening right now there isn't any.

>>511266539
Name 1 actual war between two internationally recognized states that is happening right now that's not proxy war or civil war

>>511264094 (OP)

Because the local zogbot in chief wants to import workers from Ghana I took a look and

> Ghana regularly has a lower homicide rate than Russia, Albania, Turkey, Montenegro and "Kosovo"

We would literally be safer with subsaharan niggers than most of our traditional immigrants and tourists

>>511266732
>Africans don't really care about consequences
Dictors definitely care about self preservation. The way they usually do this is by hiring foreign mercenaries. These mercs are explicitly hired to safeguard the regime. But they have no interest in actually winning the conflict because then they'd be out of a job, so those civil wars just go on forever. The actual African armies and security forces are entirely incompetent.

This merc business is so fucking profitable that it's a major piece of Russia's geopolitics strategy. It lets them capture foregn currency through African shitholes.

>>511266980
What about African democracies like Nigeria and Kenya? They don't need mercs have decent armies

>>511264094 (OP)
They're too busy killing each other. Why go across the street when you can simply go across the hall?

>>511267137
You're delulu if you think any actual demoracies exist in Africa.

>>511266326
Based. Also, the webm really made want to rewatch District 9

>>511264094 (OP)
It's not exactly a serene continent either.

>>511264094 (OP)
They don't progress beyond regional conflicts. They're basically in a constant state of disorganized civil war with pauses every now and then. They're fighting is mostly contained within a couple of kilometers from each other.

>>511267239
>>511267381
>>511267409
I know their countries are not perfect but I don't see how out of 54 countries there isn't 1 that tries to expand their borders.

>>511264209
/thread

Theys still be axxin the white man to build they countries and fight they wars n shieet but white man too esspensive for anything beyond gorilla nigger warfare.

>>511266855
Proxy wars are international wars retard. You think the M23 rebels are from thr DRC? LOL

>>511264094 (OP)
They are literally fighting themselves
How do you expect a cross border war when your house is already burning?

generally they haven't reached that stage of development yet, maybe because they are so violent

>>511268246
Yeah, most of their fighters were born in the Congo
>>511268282
China did it during WW2 against Japan

>>511264094 (OP)
Neil Ellis and one hind helicopter held more geopolitical power projection than 90% of nations in sub Saharan africa. Commie militias butchering hundreds of thousands of their stone age tribal rivals couldn't do a thing about him shooting them for 30 years.

>>511264094 (OP)
African wars are like the equivalent of the special olympics

>>511267687
The most important factor was already on my first reply >>511266326 but you probably overlooked. If ANY african nation attempts to act hostile against another, the humanitarian gibs will cease immediately.
You've gotta understand that, for these """countries""", humanitarian aid is a ridiculous amount of their total GDP. Anywhere between 30% to 70% depending on which one.
If that much of your GDP dried up the second you crossed a border, you wouldn't be starting any wars.

Hence why proxy conflicts are a thing. They learned with Iran that you can just give guns to disgruntled people within your enemies' borders and they will do all the fighting for you.

But the actual shifting of borders is not in the interest of foreign countries. The US, Russia, France, China...all of them have investments in Africa. For example, France would have an energetic collapse without the Uranium from Africa. If these mines changed hands, things would be very complicated.

The current arrangement is good for foreign powers. Being at permanent civil wars means Africans can never be independant or push for fair agreements, and they will spend much of their budget hiring mercenary/PMCs from the same people exploiting their resources.
Decolonization is a lie, nothing changed. They have simply found arrangements that were better than what they had before. You don't need to have troops and fight colonial wars, if you let the africans wear the uniforms and think they're the ones in charge.

>>511268457
I'd say that the fact the militaries aren't willing to cross state lines shows that they have some restraint

>>511268656
The fact that this neo colonial system hasn't collapsed is really impressive, maybe the constant civil wars are just a ticking time bomb world war in Africa

>>511269002
What we call "world wars" only became possible because of industrialization. Before that, it was impossible for a nation to pool its resources into a single cause. Africans lack that capacity.
If it looked like a conflict too large to be useful were to happen in Africa, foreign powers could just cut off weapon sales.

You're right, the neo colonial system is impressive. The niggers themselves have absolutely no real control, it's all make-believe.
The only way Africa could possible escape this hell would be for the world order to collapse so magnificently that every foreign power became unable to act. And that situation would have to go on long enough that one ethnicity of niggers came out on top of all others. Without a common culture, language and people, they can never escape.

>>511269865
I’m honestly surprised some African leader hasn’t been reckless enough to try an actual war of conquest and evade serious sanctions by holding their population hostage. Countries like Nigeria are too big to sanction, any penalties would likely target the leadership, while the people would still receive food aid.

>>511270156
They outright can't. Without the gibs and under sanctions, they can't pay the foreign mercenaries that keep their regimes safe. It would take no time at all for them to be removed from power.
These countries produce nothing but raw exports and have no internal markets. Without foreign markets, there is no Africa. And with war, there are no foreign markets...