>>511277194>but the rural areas are hundred years back in timeThey have both developed and developing countries coexisting within their own borders, which is both their strength and weakness.
There is still room for growth in society, wages are still low, and the supply of labor is stable and relatively homogeneous, making it easier to allocate resources to heavy industries and infrastructure development that require long-term planning. As a result, the demand also remains stable at a high leve.
Especially in rural areas, people's expectations for their standard of living are not particularly high, so they feel the benefits of economic and living standard growth and support the regime obediently.
The issue is that cities continue to draw people from rural areas to work in factories, urbanizing them and turning them into "Westernized" whiny faggots accustomed to a high standard of living over the long term.
They will identify with the victimhood associated with being from the countryside in a Western sense, and as China's growth inevitably slows down, they will begin to complain about wealth and social inequality. They have a reason to do so, as the ideology of communism has still not been completely abandoned in China.
Historically speaking, the division and fragmentation of China due to internal discord within such groups is a plausible and appealing scenario to many people. However, in reality, if they were to become groups of massive faggots, the world would truly be doomed.