does this even make economic sense?

>>511286134 (OP)
no it doesnt we need to import more indians, mexicans, africans to scam, build, and destroy these 3d printed houses.

We can print houses now?

>>511286134 (OP)
No. Its wasteful, and labor intensive(Ironically.)

>>511286134 (OP)
>>511286306
Imagine thinking technological innovation is useful. America needs more prairie niggers.

>>511286134 (OP)
I'm an industrial automation engineer. I sit in on sales meetings to some very large customers. They aren't interested in machines that replace labor.

Surprise!

They are only interested in machines that can do something a human can't. Technically this does something a human can't, but the thing it does is retarded. I talking like make 100000 of something per day or lift 100000 lbs. Things like that. Things that no amount of people could ever do.

Anyone saying that labor costs are a significant factor is straight up gaslighting you. Labor is fucking cheap. You can hire 10000 spics for the price of this thing and build 100x the houses.

There's no point to this thing. The product is shit and its not even fast.

>>511286979
do you want me to tell you how i know you’re jewish?

>>511286134 (OP)
No, it's also shit quality construction.

>>511286979
> industrial automation engineer.
MRO Tech here, im actually qualified to hold a drill, unlike you
and from my experience dumb fucks like you who sit up in the office in meetings all day love to blow cash on dumb shit like this

>>511286306
>>511286134 (OP)
it doesn't cause in a sense like self-check out in the store you the consumer don't get a real benefit. the houses won't be cheaper. most pro-automation is propaganda telling you it will reduce cost and move workers etc but it has happened still. Most automation is basically stealing jobs for huge swath of retards that only put a nut on a bolt all their life.

You get no true benefit but create a group of angry retards that will eventually try to do something.

you can thank the dodge brothers

Concrete production releases a ton of carbon dioxide during its production so if countries start enforcing a carbon tax, house printers will need to find a new material to be economical. Plus you need a concrete plant nearby plus mixer trucks so these houses are only viable near cities or existing concrete plants. Then you need workers to install more traditional floors or a crane to lift slabs.

So maybe a whole subdivision would be viable but why not just build traditional concrete towers instead to maximise ROI on the land.

its total shit. but it has potential to not be.
i can see a few generations of this technology down the line, it becoming extremely convenient.
a guy could rent one from harbor freight or where ever that can just be pulled on a trailer behind a normal truck, set up and left to run by itself, just needing refilled once in a while until its laid a flat smooth foundation with proper drainage, then pump out a nice dome around itself and back itself out back onto the trailer and turn off.

It would have to print the walls hollow so you could drop rebar matts in and grout. But executed intelligently like stopping partway throughout to suspend pipes and electrical conduit in the walls could work. The big issue is you have to keep it fed with whatever the concrete mix is and not let it harden in the pump but there’s delaying agents and plasticizers you could use.

Or someone could just lobby government to outlaw this via building code or some shit.

>>511286134 (OP)
I think it would be better to have interlocking reusable molds so you can just dump the shit in way quicker than this machine. Maybe don't make them reusable and just take all the old tires and a few other compounds and use those as the molds? I feel like the concrete could be applied way quicker?

>>511286979
I will live in a cardboard box if it was crafted by White men.

>>511286134 (OP)
No. Fortunately it turns out Mexicans print themselves.

>bro just buy a 200,000+ dollar machine that makes houses walls ugly as fuck and cannot even do the roof

>>511287926
btw kit homes can be put up in less than a week and are actually functional compared to this abomination

>>511286134 (OP)
Yes. Society would be better off making disposable houses that depreciate instead of going up in value. You wouldn't have people hoarding houses then.

>>511286134 (OP)
>Economic
>sense
pick 1

>>511286134 (OP)
I know a Russian girl that works for one of these 3D printing building companies and all she does is travel and be a general instagram basic travel bitch. Has always confused me.

>>511286979
>They aren't interested in machines that replace labor.
Is that why they replace labour with machines?

>>511287157
can confirm
t. meetech

>>511286134 (OP)
posted a thumbnail award

HOW TO MAKE IT RAEPFUGEE/MIGRANT RESISTANT ?????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????

>>511286365
>I'm an industrial automation engineer. I sit in on sales meetings to some very large customers.


>I talking like make 100000 of something per day or lift 100000 lbs.

>>511288592
fair point
the process:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pxrVEfxrwUw
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GNLNk3hTQgs
https://www.youtube.com/shorts/1QLuLTVApU4

>>511288669
attach ai powered turrets that scan for rapefugees using compuer vision

>>511286134 (OP)
No. But economics are bullshit. So maybe.

>>511286365
It's 20 year old technology that they are purposefully keeping down because it pretty much makes mexicans obsolete.

they would rather hire mexicans than let you afford a 5 bedroom home for 180k dollars.

>>511289004
Stick frame houses built by mexican slaves makes more economic sense than paying white men to build and 3d print houses.

>>511286134 (OP)
Seems inefficient, but could be a great machine for putting cement between bricks so you can avoid doing that tedious task yourself
But then your profit margins go down

>>511288537
White countries without millions of brown people to the south are leading the way in labor replacement innovation, not America. You guys pay $30/hr to pick crops and work in factories. That actually helps you because it creates a market for these expensive machines.

You can refine your designs, develop your manufacturing processes, and still make money selling in your country. Then, once you have everything all figured out, you come to America to sell it. You could never develop these designs here. There just isn't a market that will support it during its growing phase. Labor is just too cheap and customers are fucking lazy. They only want turnkey solutions. They make enough hiring spics that it isn't worth the hassle or the upfront cost to buy machines like this.

So not only do spics hurt the labor market, but they kill American innovation as well.

>>511287363
Solution is to make voting harder in a non-ID based way, as ID based restrictions are designed to make it easy for good goyim with lots of bills and time to stand in the real ID line be able to vote. Needs to be a system that doesn't punish having a job and not having lots of extra bills.

>>511288439
I had a booty call who worked as a medical device sales manager, it turns out her job was literally to fuck orthopedic surgeons and get them to buy their titanium screws.

>>511289289
>lower quality home that cost more is more economic sense than higher quality home that cost less

i now understand how you retards let chinese people buy all your houses.
you're too retarded to know what's economically feasible.

>>511286134 (OP)
>Concreteslop
Nei.

>>511290031
Least sexually degrading Russian female job.

>>511287768
>interlocking reusable mold
ICF blocks, they have had them for at least 25 years probably more like 50.

>>511286134 (OP)
unironically yes

>>511286134 (OP)
3D printing houses? Long term yes, as the printers get more advanced. Short term it could be useful to create low quality houses in poor areas, assuming it's easy to operate and reliable enough.

>>511290060
glasslop is even worse lmao

>>511289809
Labour is White people. We aren't discussing slaves here, slaves who have already replaced labour.

Shit, you can just look at tech for a more recent example to prove you wrong. There are a few companies that pledged that they weren't going to hire software engineers anymore, instead they'd up their reliance on AI. Turns out it went very poorly for them but they were still eager to replace their "labourers" in jobs they could do.

>>511288537
Machines are capital investment intensive. Labour costs however are marginal. You can scale up or down your labour input very easily. Businesses invest in machines that reduce labour need for simple repetitive tasks that the machine produces a consistent quality product. Think cement mixer. Jackhammer. Lifters etc. you could dig a hole in the ground by hand with enough shovels but a machine can move much more earth so you invest in the machine. But once you get down in the ground eventually you might need precision work that only labour can provide. Imagine trying to use a machine to tell the difference between a gas line and a tree root while it's digging.

>>511287363
This is normally where the government should be stepping in and saying "You aren't doing that". I know there were a few fast food stores that were completely automated and the local government told them to take a hike because they were taking up space and siphoning money while offering no jobs to the community. It didn't happen in every case but it has happened.

>>511286134 (OP)
>automate the easiest part of home building
Liberals...

>>511290497
>Imagine trying to use a machine to tell the difference between a gas line and a tree root while it's digging.
I don't know how extensive it is but there've recently been ads on TV advertising a government website to help them avoid underground cables/piping. It would be trivial to hook that up to a machine (though the machine would be more than likely rely on that information unwaveringly).

>>511287052
That's pretty impressive discernment you have. I suspected it when he claimed "They" aren't interested in machines that replace labor. Quite a claim he just made without any evidence whatsoever. Probably why he invented his backstory shortly before he posted this. But I knew for certain he was jewish when he said "Surprise!". That kind of sarcastic gaslighting to support an unsourced dual claim of both the information and the so-called authority is the calling card of jews.

How did you know?

>>511287926
They look cool and can be painted another color. Besides they gray scale everything new nowadays. Might as well get something naturally gray and sturdy.

>>511290677
I mean yeah the city have maps of all that stuff but once you get down there you have to be careful. My whole point is that machines work best on the simple tasks. The more complex the machine the more likely it is to fuck up. Also although they save on labour it also can require more skilled labour to operate it anyway

prefab and modular housing is the future and it will cause prices per square foot to plummet while increasing quality of housing exponentially. but we are many many years away from adoption and the rate of development is slow. I think in ten years we'll be ready to really get started and by then robotics will also be transforming labor. we have other issues with shit zoning/sprawl and the ghouls scamming everyone with "affordable housing" schemes. lot of shit has to get fixed for this to really work in a meaningful way. satellite internet and self-driving + flying cars, new zoning, etc. can transform landscapes and rural living. modular and printed housing plus off grid tech like batteries will basically mean you can have a really nice place anywhere you want that you can buy a parcel of land.

>>511286365
This is old tech by now kek. They can make those Tesla homes or "pod" houses easily and put them almost anywhere you want. Retards and companies who are all invested into residential properties cannot see it coming at all, or even think about what the future could look.

>>511291081
Prefab is lower quality than old Seers shit.

>>511291081
modern stick frame housing is basically prefab
the only reason Jose has to break out the miter is because Juan fucked up

>>511286979
Pearls before swine, friend.

>>511286134 (OP)
No. The constraint has never been the material of the walls or even the roof. It's always been the dozens of taxes and fees you have to pay to the state to develop land from barren dirt and rock to the finished utility equipped slab you need to build the house on. To get to the point where you can erect the first wall you're usually a quarter million in these days. The cost of materials and even labor pales in comparison to the initial development costs, which is why it's impossible to buy a newly constructed house for any less than $300k anywhere in this country and in most markets that price floor is closer to $500k.

>>511286134 (OP)
Only for commercial projects where it might be extremely hazardous, like nuclear plants or toxic waste dumps

>>511286979
been this way since all human history
Greeks had steam engines but used them for opening giant temple doors, and had slaves carry everything

>>511286979
>You can hire 10000 spics for the price of this thing and build 100x the houses.

So for every one of these machines we can get rid of 10000 spics? Sounds like a good investment to me

These machines come from a company here in Austin Texas. I've actually toured a 3d printed house and honestly it's extremely interesting. The technology is only in the early stage but this is the future. 10 years now these machines will be building everything

>>511286134 (OP)
no. we need nigger slaves

>>511290318
It's not glasslop
It's an Earth ship
It's just that all of the designs are slop
I aim to change that

>>511291982
This is a real house. Building it into, or with, nature.

imagine the dust that'd collect on every square inch

>>511292047
I have ten windows and loads of deck lumber, I just can't imagine a design that doesn't look like a hallway.

>>511292191
Build a pyramid.

>>511292120
clearly left that way to showcase the process
anyone can plaster a wall

>>511286134 (OP)
No, it costs millions for the machine which is literally just concrete. You'd be better off just doing a rammed earth build or making a wall mold and pouring concrete. Brick and mortar is easier than setting up some shit like this. It is not difficult to build a house, modern people are tricked into thinking it is. Shilled if you will.

>>511292310
i actually kind of like the look the raw walls give

>>511291081
>>511286134 (OP)
No advancement in house building would reduce house costs.
House prices is tied to credit money printing (effectively infinite money supply) via mortgages.
Hose price = at least 36% of your income via mortgage or rent. This is how fractional reserve money printing works.

>>511292292

>>511292120
>cope
go ahead foreskinlet-kun, cope to your heart desire.
>>511292310 this anon is right, btw.
You don't let your cardboard wall expose, right? You put some plaster on top, same thing here, you could also spray even more concrete on top. Let's see how the tech devs. Maybe they will invent something out like a different external layer place by a secondary machine.
A even quicker and perfect building.

>>511286134 (OP)

This is a stupid gimmick. No, it doesn't make any sense, not engineering-wise or economy-wise.

We have already perfected the economic use of concrete and it's called plattenbau aka. commieblocks.

>>511292405
its actually really nice to see a room that isnt 90 degree angles at every junction

Vertical farming is cool though i think that one is worth wasting money on.
>>511292606
do they actually assemble commie blocks block per block like a shipping container?
hadnt thoight about it.

>>511286499
>labor intensive
Explain yourself. It literally is the opposite from the videos I've seen.

>>511292411
Then either put the latin cross, or a ankh, or the byzantine cross at the tip top point of the pyramid. Made out of solid gold of course.

>>511291177
technology advances anon. in the case of modular designs and automated fabrication it will advance in incredible directions.
>>511291278
some of the automated building proof of concept work being done is just robots placing sticks. I think "stick houses" are going to be around for a while. people are used to them.
>>511292407
objectively retarded shitholer who has no fucking clue what is going on in either technology or the end of bretton woods.

>>511286134 (OP)
I believe so. Aside from cutting labor costs it also seems more efficient in terms of material usage. Both in construction material and other temporary supporting materials required for construction.
I can picture a whole slew of costs getting cut with this method making it also more environment friendly..

>>511292950
Advancement doesn't mean better for the user, it just means better (cheaper) for the creator.

>>511292801

Yes they do. Especially the bathrooms. Already 50 years ago they made industrially produced full bathroom elements which were then piled like containers on the construction site. In my country the bathrooms are made in the same factories as the cabins for cruise ships. Those are also whole room prefabs.

Picrel is a medium sized concrete prefab factory. It shits out every day hundreds of times more prefab elements than the OP's faggy gimmick machine. It has VOLUMES. The whole construction industry has been optimized to build as cheaply and as fast as possible, with as little personnel as possible, with products produced by it. Now that's efficiency. That's how it's done in real world. OP's gimmick shit is basically a way to extract shekels from stupid cryptobros and other people who have too much money and too little understanding of anything.

T. Civil engineer

>>511286365
It's basically just adobe houses, automated
So they have drawbacks in most places
But the real interesting tech is now, using a mix of sawdust and sealing agent which would be fairly easy to work with once hardened

>>511292585
Wow so mean. What did I do to you?
I'm not even circumcised, I just don't like dust.

Also, I find it hard to believe that there's any fundamental reason why most houses in the US can't look like picrelated (apart from demographics)

>>511292950
>I think "stick houses" are going to be around for a while. people are used to them.
Well, they have been in use for over 100 years

>>511286365
This has been a thing since 2012ish at least lill unc

>>511286134 (OP)
It replaces 50 Mexicans at half the price, zero crime, and less drugs so no.

>>511292941
Based

>mogs your ender 3 shitbox goon cave 100 years ago

>>511293492
ITSH SHLOP

>>511286365
>born yesterday

>>511293552
die, coomer

>>511293606
OY VEY!

>>511286979
capitalism was a mistake.

>>511293492
I would unironically prefer a doublewide trailer over one of these monstrosity white elephants. My friend, he thought he got such a great deal on a $250,000 Victorian in a historical district. I'll admit that is actually a good deal for what it is as a house, but the poor bastard can't even do anything new with it or put things in the town doesn't approve of. He's probably almost paid the price of the house in heating and cooling by now and he's only had it 6 years. It's worth it to him, waking up at 6am everyday to work for it despite already owning it.