Do yall have any evidence that vaccines are bad for children?
I'm talking about normal vaccines, not covid.

>>511360748 (OP)
What do you consider a normal vaccine? A protein subunit? Viral vector? Live attenuated? Recombinant? Polysaccharide? Which one are you referring to as normal.

>>511360748 (OP)

Those adjuvants are highly questionable to any genuine immunologist. Proinflammatory signals are nothing to play around with. I mean ... come on. I know what crayon eating retards the medical establishment truly is. Now I could accept genuine error as an excuse. But I doubt this is the case with publication histories anymore. Not even ignorance (still excusable but damning). Go dig a ditch ... wörk to do. Against better conscience is eligible for elimination. :)

Yes the Amish.
98% of the Amish are unvaccinated.
If childhood vaccinations are necessary the Amish should have a higher child mortality rate.
But they don't.
Studies have shown that child mortality in the Amish is either lower than vaccinated childen, or the same.
There are no studies showing their child mortality is higher than in groups of vaccinated childen.
If the child mortality rate in the unvaccinated Amish is the same as in groups of vaccinated children, then that proves vaccines are useless.
If the child mortality rate in the unvaccinated Amish is lower than in groups of vaccinated children, then that proves vaccines are bad for you.
The Amish are one of the fastest growing religious groups. As they don't go around looking for converts that means their growth is internal, meaning Amish couples have lots of children who grow up to have lots of children.
Their children don't get vaccinated, and yet they don't have higher rate of illness than vaccinated children, nor do they have a higher rate of infant mortality.
Conclusion: vaccines are not necessary