Why did women become radicalized over the last 20 years or so? While men seems to be roughly stayed the same, maybe few points upwards to center.

>>511366940 (OP)
Radicalized? Or just finally allowed to speak after centuries of being property? Men "stayed the same" because the system was built FOR them. Women waking up to inequality isn't radicalism, it’s basic human dignity.

>>511366941
Your mom didnt have basic dignity? Wow. Must have been something. Did your father beat your mom daily?

>>511366940 (OP)
All this tells you is which fake zionist political party each gender of goyim was directed to support by Jewish media. Goyim are so retarded that Jews could flip this in a week and have conservatard men supporting libtard causes and vice versa, they do it all the time, like how they turned libtards into red-baiting anti-Russian fanatics which used to be a conservative position or how they turned conservatards into anti-vaccine fanatics which used to be a granola hippy leftist position. The important thing is to engineer a situation where the country is perpetually divided into a near 50/50 split, so goyim are constantly fighting over fake nonsense while jews rule unimpeded.

Because of the recent third-wave feminist movement.

>>511366940 (OP)
Women are based

>>511366941
Centuries of healing in 10 to 15 years? Lmao it's like the past was always shitty but it gets revised every 10 to 20 years like as if the 2000s were a shitty time in the 2020s or the 1980s were a shitty time in the 2000s.

>>511366941
Funny how this only happened after equality (in fact female preference) before the law had already been in place for half a century (closer to a whole century in actuality but whatever).

>>511366941

>>511366941
>T.ranny

What does "liberal" mean?

>>511366940 (OP)
Target the kids and the women, and the men will come.

Well, in this case the men don't come, but you know...

>>511366941
The 80s and 90s were great. This was when we hit equilibrium, as woman and non-whites gained rights and equality. Then, in the 2000s, we went past equilibrium, and into a zone were every degenerate wanted something more than equality. These degenerates wanted power for themselves, at the expense of society ad a whole. So all the degenerates started to attack straight white men, and push the pendulum of "progress" in the direction of a new form of oppression.

Also, this thread belongs on /pol/

Tldr; we need to go back to the 80s and 90s, and stay there.

>>511366940 (OP)
They're easier to socially condition, this is caused by easier transmission of information as a result of technology.

>>511366940 (OP)
It's not just women.

>Recent surveys have shown increasing polarization between young men and women in the West. Yet, little is known about whether or how this manifests among teenagers. Drawing on a unique dataset of 130,000 Norwegian high school students (aged 15-18) interviewed in the period 1989-2023, I show that the gender gap in left-right ideology has surged over the past 10 years, reaching its highest recorded level (twice as high as among young adults). I argue that this development is driven in large part by a new wave of politically potent anti-feminism among boys. A growing percentage of boys believe that ‘gender equality has gone too far’, which is increasingly associated with right-wing identification. Employing a decomposition analysis, I estimate that the gender equality issue accounts for 40-50% of the increased polarization between boys and girls. This result does not appear to be explained by reversed causality (i.e. parties persuading long-time supporters).

https://doi.org/10.31219/osf.io/7z2va

>>511366940 (OP)
I don't think it's so radical, but I do think it's economic. Women do better with the "soft skills" (i.e. schmoozing) while getting into the white-collar corporate world where there are high salaries for not much work and jump employers the moment they get a better offer. The political culture of this environment is liberal. There are a lot of men who'd be driven insane by this stuff I think.

>>511366951
How did Orwell know this?

But yeah, women are shooting past men in the corporate world, and then there's another factor in Europe/the U.S. where immigrants are undercutting the native men in traditional male-coded industries. Big opportunity for right-wing parties to appeal to these men.

>>511366940 (OP)
cause hoes ain't loyal
>>511366957
the other issue is that we are only importing men from the third world and dating apps are making harems so there are a lot of excess men. if we only allowed attractive single women to migrate it would fix this

>>511366940 (OP)
Conservatives became more misogynistic, so its only logical that they wouldn't appeal to female voters. What next anon, are you going to tell us that the sky is blue?

>>511366956
he spend time in the barracks of Spanish socialist parties and armies dude.

>>511366952
the 90s were kind of woke too
>source?
I was there.

>>511366959
those kinds of things just don't appear out of thin air, though.

sexual freedom destroys the family and women have an easier time getting sex than men do on average, so those organizations targeted them specifically to cause this to happen, the feminist orgs, that is.

>>511366943
there's only so much you can do to a rabid animal before it kills you.

>>511366959
dems hate men and want all men killed. it's self defense to be a misogynist

>>511366940 (OP)
>Why did women become radicalized over the last 20 years or so?

>Fellas, why don't women like any of the political parties that typically want to take away all their rights and social privileges?
>I told these ladies they need to take their shoes off, get back in the kitchen, and start making me kids and sandwiches, or I'd sew their vagina shut, and now there's a 23pt political divide gap??!?? Make it make sense.

Granted, women are obviously not monolithic.
There are plenty of conservative women who'll betray their own personal interests in the exact same way there's plenty of women who're romantically interested in rapists and murderers. You also need to understand that "female progressiveness" isn't exactly the same as "male progressiveness": progressive women are more in favor of banning pornography for instance.

>>511366940 (OP)
Because of an effort of the banks, CIA, multinational corporations, book publishers, and governments, all controlled by the same people.

>>511366965
>progressive women are more in favor of banning pornography for instance.

Its because male sexuality is seen as dangerous by society. Once again women are much more in favor of consensus opinion. Its why more men are libertarian and much more in favor of free speech. Women will always be church ladies compared to men who also tend to be less religious overall.

>>511366940 (OP)
Women left churches and started listening to other women.

They're actually turbo normies and natural conservatives, but they conform to their own incestuous world of other women virtue signaling nonsense. Also post socialist identity politics driven progressive... politics is a mental hack for the female brain. The #1 way to express power and fight amongst conformist women is to claim the biggest amount of victimhood and be the most emotionally neurotic. Women don't tell other women to shut the fuck up and toughen up - so easily. So guess what floats to the top of a gynocentric community?

>>511366968
>Women don't tell other women to shut the fuck up and toughen up - so easily.
Maybe us guys should adopt their tactics

>>511366965
>Fellas, why don't men like any of the political parties that typically want to take away all their rights and social privileges?
goes both ways, fag

>>511366970
So... Why american parties just decided to chooce one gender and took all their rights out of nowhere? Was it autism or...

>>511366940 (OP)
Have you spoken to a gen z right wing white male? Men are radicalizing too, and even young white women aren't particularly left wing.

>>511366972
What radicalized men is free access to pornography. Now they are brainrotten gooners instead of healthy people. I see it over and over.
The only argument against porn being a social problem is porn being so socially accepted that it has become almost impossible to point out it's flaws or negative influence on people.
The world is in ruins, men have become brain rotted pussies and women are the ones in charge and the only ones getting shit done in their lives because men are useless as fuck. So yeah, it is all there in that study.
If the goal was to make men mentally ill, depressed and a societal cancer that's all over the place this is the path to take.
We see it every day. Porn makes the world worse and we are still doing it.

I've said this a million times. Porn, porn culture and porn mentality is what causes a lot of the political discourse.

>>511366970
>nooo i want to have the right to beat and rape women - these man-hating feminists are out of control

>>511366971
AIPAC
>>511366974
dems literally talk about how much they hate white men all the time and how they want to arrest and convict men with zero evidence and how they want to remove men from leadership positions in the government and in private companies and they want to ban guns and they seethe about men not liking troons
there is a reason why the dems are underwater with young men, tranny

>>511366973
>>511366972
>What radicalized men is free access to pornography.
no, it's because the dems actively hate men and want us dead or enslaved

>>511366974
No. We just don't want to be treated like manservants who can never talk back to women's excesses and revenge narratives. Gender quotas, increasingly difficult to get educated. We still have to adopt patriarchal virtues with none of the prestige and opportunities. Not worth it. I want a good job, to make money and be left alone, but nowadays women come first in job selection.

>>511366974
Women beat men and psychologically abuse them too but get away with it because they are still taking advantage of benevolent sexism, and I bet it is underreported. The day women are called out on their shit as much as we are I'll support equality again.

>>511366975
You know, maybe men should try to not be rapist for a one second? Just a suggestion. I bet you had rape thoughts today.

>>511366979
maybe dems should stop trying to kill all white men if they want to win elections, tranny

>>511366972
>right wing gen z white males are radicalized
>meanwhile right wing genz white male
uhh inflation is bad, mmk?
grooming children to be castrated sounds evil, mmmk?
open borders, sounds bad, mmk?

>meanwhile left wing gen z
EVERYONES RACIST!!!
I LOVE TERRORISM
I LOVE OPEN BORDERS!
I LOVE COMMUNISM!!

>>511366981
> EVERYONES RACIST!!!
> I LOVE TERRORISM
> I LOVE OPEN BORDERS!
> I LOVE COMMUNISM!!
0/10 shitty strawman

>>511366981
good post
>>511366982
bad post

>>511366976
>hate men
No they don't. They hate white people.

>>511366981
Your average gen z right wing white guy is watching white nationalist podcasts and praising Hitler. At no point did I say this is a bad thing.

>>511366985
>everyone I dont like his a white nationalist and loves Hitler

>>511366941
This could be a literal woman, but it could also be bait. In both cases it’s best to ignore it.

>>511366986
>white nationalism is bad
Is implicit in your statement. NGMI buddy.

>>511366984
they hate white men the most

>>511366965
>progressive women are more in favor of banning pornography for instance.
It doesn't explain the high amount of onlyfans whores.

>>511366985
It's worse. They are worshipping white nigga Andrew Tate.

>>511366961
the 70s were kind of woke too
>source?
I was there.

The "equality" in the 70s and 80s and 90s was mostly an illusion. Bill Cosby and Will Smith were on TV presenting a fantasy of black culture when the reality was more like NWA and Public Enemy. Same is true for women and LGBTQ communities. All these groups are still fighting against the system.

>>511366991
Brown people and wiggers like Tate.

>>511366991
>>511366993
Even so, Tate is telling white people to be white supremacists.

>>511366992
ok boomer

>>511366943
This.

>>511366990
It’s because they only want to stop men from masturbating to drawings and AI slop. If men are occupied with drawings instead of onlyfans whores and findoms that means there’s less money going into women’s pockets.

>>511366941
>>511366959
>>511366965
Then why do women vote for bringing in more violent brown rapists who want establish their own form of patriarchy?
It's like they have a suicide wish.

>>511366941
>Radicalized? Or just finally allowed to speak after centuries of being property? Men "stayed the same" because the system was built FOR them. Women waking up to inequality isn't radicalism, it’s basic human dignity.
>Women waking up to inequality isn't radicalism, it’s basic human dignity.
>X isn't Y, it's [snappy descriptor]
Chatgpt.

>>511366998
They want their men to fight but they don’t understand their men with fight a civil war and the men who resist the invader will be betrayed, this is by design, it’s a high jacking of the social dynamics.
Woman wants to be princess in peril and be saved like a damsel should be by a heroic chad. However the jews have socially engineered the spiteful mutants, Pfizerbabies, vaxbabs, boomers, and shitskins to wage war on chad in all forms, to wage war on beauty, on strength, on nobility.
Chad is beaten down, he can not save the day because saving the day has become a mousetrap.

Now it’s up to Chud. Chud has taken up the mantle, an unlikely hero, a lone wanderer of the barren plains of a hollowed out empire, a mutant just as deranged and spiteful as the coalition formed against him, but Chud is the Nietzschean man, a bridge between the spiteful mutant and the human, between the human and the chad, between the chad and the Superman.
with Will of Steel and Hearts of Iron (IV) Chud drives on tirelessly waging his own silent war on ugliness, falsehood, and weakness.
When he overcomes it in himself he can overcome it in others, and the entirety of ZOG which runs on the subhumanity of the dregs shall come crashing down.

>>511366965
>progressive women are more in favor of banning pornography for instance.
Proof? Progressive women might be in favor of banning porn made by men, but they're not (typically) against the concept of porn. Conservative women on the other hand blame porn for all of society's ills.

>>511366940 (OP)
because feminism is warfare against men under the disguise of equality
>>511366941
this is zero sum game, result of making women "equal" is they became slaves for corporations just like men, there is nothing freeing about that

>>511366940 (OP)
41% of voting age Americans don't vote and don't have political leanings. This study is only about you fucking retards that need masters and vote every four years for one. Everyone else has a normal dating/sex life. Partisans are the only faggots dealing with this shit. Politics is for fucking losers.

>>511366941
Feminism has lied to you, constantly

>>511366940 (OP)
iPhone was released in 2008.

>>511366941
The system was always built by men for women at mens expense

>>511366940 (OP)
They were not radicalized, women were just allowed to be themselves and this is the result...

>>511371218
i think it might have to do with modern day feminism gaining momentum in the 90s and early 00s and then not getting enough support from men.