Dear RMS, metux: In response to censorship and banning, as mentioned in (
>[dev] Kernel maintainer *CENSORED* on LKML [WAS: linux: Goodbye from a Linux community volunteer]
>https://lists.suckless.org/dev/2410/35774.html )

For what it's worth, I'm banned from the LKML too.
Linus is your enemy. Your only real option is to physically fight him
or his lieutenants in real life.
Same with the others.

Remember: he availed himself of the public for decades:
Taking free labour from all the hackers.
Now he has turned his back on hackers and infavor of wage-workers and
corporates.
Yet he keeps the code.
Or "rewrites" it and claims it never existed from the hackers.

It might sound bad: but that's the only way things of honour can be resolved.

I can't send this email to the LKML. (not using html, text only) (or any other email):
Linux License of grsecurity should be canceled

Grsecurity has prevented redistribution of it's
derivative work of the Linux(R) kernel successfully.
There have been no leaks of this derivative work.

They have also added a term to their derivative work of the Linux(R)
kernel stating that any redistribution of the derivative work will
incur a penalty: no more derivative work and withholding of paid funds.

To avoid this penalty no one has leaked the proprietary work of
grsecurity which is a derivative work of the Linux Kernel.

OpenSource licenses are now considered a joke, and opensource programmers
who work for free as clowns.

You can cancel the license grsecurity has to the Linux Kernel code.
Any of you whom has contributed to the Linux Kernel own your code: you
can cancle grsecurity's license to your code.

1) grsecurity never paid you anything. (nor did you ask for anything)
They cannot rely on contract law to enforce their license.
2) Grsecurity is required to follow copyright law.
They cannot claim following the terms of the license are "performance" under contract law: they have a duty to not violate Federal Copyright.
3) Grsecurity is violating the copyright license (which they got
for free) of your code. Your permission states that additional restrictive terms
are not permitted to be attached to the corpus of the copyrighted Work.
Grsecurity have added additional restrictive terms: they have
abrogated the "no additional restrictions" term by adding a new term:
no redistribution of the derivative work.
That new term has been successfully enforced by self-help by
grsecurity.

You will laugh and claim that
> "THE GPL ALLOWS PEOPLE TO FORBID REDISTRIBUTION LOL!" and
> "THE GPL IS JUST TALKING ABOUT NOT CHANGING THE TEXT OF THE GPL ITSELF LOL!" > and "ITS A PATCH, SO THEY CAN PUT IT UNDER WHATEVER LICENSE THEY WANT SINCE > THEY DONT INCLUDE LINUX WITH IT"
And ther

is no way for anyone to convince you otherwise.
But you are wrong.
Dear Bruce Perens,
Please. Please sue Open Source Security.
Before it's too late.

Dear RMS;
Open Source Security has defeated you.

They have blocked my messages and that of other code hackers by heuristics for many years now.
They have availed themselves of the free labour of my class of people: claiming freedom and no censorship when they needed our class.
Now they betray us all.

I want to kill them.
This waste of life by 1000s of hackers who worked for them; who gave all their time.
To only be betrayed.

Must be accounted for in kind.

I can't send anything, they block by heuristics.
I remeber when the censorship of the LKML first started. They really didn't like anti-feminist and 'please sue grsecurity' and "no code of conduct" messages eventually.

Linus should be killed.
He availed himself of the public hackers.
Now aligns with their enemies.

linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

To subscribe send an email to: linux-kernel+subscribe@vger.kernel.org
subscribe

Text only (no html) (setting in email client (... tab in many)

>>511392344 (OP)
Linus is amazeballs ngl
I hope a benevolent AI replaces him when it's time

where will you be an asshole and get banned from next?

https://felipec.wordpress.com/2025/06/11/enrico-weigelt/

Linus purposefully availed himself of the hacker's labour. Then betrayed the ethos of the same hackers and ran into the arms of their enemies.

He is a traitor.

>>511392795
>where will you be an asshole and get banned from next?

I encourage metux to physically torture and kill his enemies. He is Italian/German it seems. Maybe he'll do it.

The only answer to censorship is killing.
The only answer to disrespect is torture and murder.

Always has been.
They don't want to talk: so only action can suffice as a messenger.

IE "we're done talking" from the other side.
The Non-Hacker side.

Hackers need to kill these people.
The've stolen their lives and then kicked them out.
Programs take forever to write.
Decade+

>>511392678
>Linus is amazeballs ngl
>I hope a benevolent AI replaces him when it's time

He censors hackers and ran into the arms of the previous enemies of hackers.
How is he "amaze balls"?

He also blocked grsecurity in 2008 so that linux couldn't have difficult to hack memory protection etc.
Which was the inflection point.

From 1993-2003 linux was ALL hacker labour.
All the foundational code was hackers.
NOT "industry"

you should make your own linux with blackjack and hookers!

What?

"you'll be free hackers, you'll be free"
We aren't free anymore

>>511393171
>you should make your own linux with blackjack and hookers!

That's how linux started:
>we shud make our own Minix(TM)(R) with i386 and eventually X (Xfree86, not X.org).

Linus violated the copyright on Minux (yes he did), then roped in hackers to help him code; and that was the rise of linux from 1993 till about 2003.

He has now, for many years, betrayed those same people.
So: we allready DID that.

>>511393489
should have installed a real unix like xenix

stupid bots. deepseek is more fun to talk and code with than /pol/gpt