Linux License of grsecurity should be canceled

Grsecurity has prevented redistribution of it's
derivative work of the Linux(R) kernel successfully.
There have been no leaks of this derivative work.

They have also added a term to their derivative work of the Linux(R)
kernel stating that any redistribution of the derivative work will
incur a penalty: no more derivative work and withholding of paid funds.

To avoid this penalty no one has leaked the proprietary work of
grsecurity which is a derivative work of the Linux Kernel.

OpenSource licenses are now considered a joke, and opensource programmers
who work for free as clowns.

You can cancel the license grsecurity has to the Linux Kernel code.
Any of you whom has contributed to the Linux Kernel own your code: you
can cancle grsecurity's license to your code.

1) grsecurity never paid you anything. (nor did you ask for anything)
They cannot rely on contract law to enforce their license.
2) Grsecurity is required to follow copyright law.
They cannot claim following the terms of the license are "performance" under contract law: they have a duty to not violate Federal Copyright.
3) Grsecurity is violating the copyright license (which they got
for free) of your code. Your permission states that additional restrictive terms
are not permitted to be attached to the corpus of the copyrighted Work.
Grsecurity have added additional restrictive terms: they have
abrogated the "no additional restrictions" term by adding a new term:
no redistribution of the derivative work.
That new term has been successfully enforced by self-help by
grsecurity.

You will laugh and claim that
> "THE GPL ALLOWS PEOPLE TO FORBID REDISTRIBUTION LOL!" and
> "THE GPL IS JUST TALKING ABOUT NOT CHANGING THE TEXT OF THE GPL ITSELF LOL!" > and "ITS A PATCH, SO THEY CAN PUT IT UNDER WHATEVER LICENSE THEY WANT SINCE > THEY DONT INCLUDE LINUX WITH IT"
And there is no way for anyone to convince you otherwise.
But you are wrong.

Dear Bruce Perens,
Please. Please sue Open Source Security.
Before it's too late.

Dear RMS;
Open Source Security has defeated you.

The LKML won't allow this message to be posted
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org linux-kernel+subscribe@vger.kernel.org

Linus purposefully availed himself of the hacker's labour. Then betrayed the ethos of the same hackers and ran into the arms of their enemies.

He is a traitor.

They have blocked my messages and that of other code hackers by heuristics for many years now.
They have availed themselves of the free labour of my class of people: claiming freedom and no censorship when they needed our class.
Now they betray us all.

I want to kill them.
This waste of life by 1000s of hackers who worked for them; who gave all their time.
To only be betrayed.

Must be accounted for in kind.

>>511392795
>where will you be an asshole and get banned from next?

I encourage metux to physically torture and kill his enemies. He is Italian/German it seems. Maybe he'll do it.

The only answer to censorship is killing.
The only answer to disrespect is torture and murder.

Always has been.
They don't want to talk: so only action can suffice as a messenger.

IE "we're done talking" from the other side.
The Non-Hacker side.

Hackers need to kill these people.
The've stolen their lives and then kicked them out.
Programs take forever to write.
Decade+

"you'll be free hackers, you'll be free"
We aren't free anymore.