>>511401035... Could you be less bad faith, potential englin cryptocuck?
I laid out the historical pattern.
Due to lack of any kind of threat or major concerns that requires cooperation the feedback loops reinforcing those behaviours fall off and people instead focus on sexual competition within the group.
The three possible ways to go from there were:
a.) accept continuous fall in cooperation and organisation until some other civilization with higher organisation takes over.
b.) war to decrease male numbers to decrease in group sexual competition
c.) rescind women rights through any way to something akin to before feminism ever happened. Or whatever.
I never mentioned the economy. It does not really matter in this instance.
War on the other hand is the only real way to create male scarcity. Unless we go by what you imply and the thing I saw that one Mexican anon that keeps posting about female zootechnical breeding farms... that would be the only way to increase female surplus, and seems to be what you want to sarcastically imply, if a bit eyebrow raising.
But regardless of that you will note that one option that you consistently have danced around does not even fucking require any kind of war or systematic killings or abortions or whatever.
Why do all of your steering just goes to some version of path a.), and just kick the can down the road bro?
You are all so fucking tiresome.
>>511401847Ha. Good one.
