Cheap and mass produced, every home and business will have AI powered robots. BILLIONS will lose their jobs as this disruptive technology gets adopted. Why hire a human when robots are cheap as dirt and don't require health insurance, dental or holidays?
https://youtu.be/v1Q4Su54iho
The industry is predicted to generate $26 TRILLION in earnings.
>Andreessen, co-founder of the tech investment firm Andreessen Horowitz (A16Z), envisioned a future with “billions, perhaps tens of billions” of robots performing tasks from industrial production to healthcare. “I think there’s a plausible argument, which Elon also believes, that robotics is going to be the biggest industry in the history of the planet,” he said. ARK Investment Management LLC’s Big Ideas 2025 report supports this vision, forecasting a transformative robotics industry that boosts productivity across sectors. It highlights specialized robots, such as household appliances, slashing time spent on daily tasks. The report projects generalizable robotics could generate over $26 trillion in global revenue, split evenly between $13 trillion in household robotics and $13 trillion in manufacturing robotics.
https://www.zerohedge.com/technology/marc-andreessen-predicts-biggest-industry-history-planet

>>511400793 (OP)
Can that robot actually DO anything or is it just another novelty toy like the G1?

I had a thought that one way we meatbags can still compete against robots and AI is to take all the really dirty jobs that would mess up robots. Things like drain workers, potato diggers, cleaners of all types, oil drillers and miners etc. Basically any job that would destroy a robot via water or wear and tear.

>>511401092
>Can that robot actually DO anything or is it just another novelty toy like the G1?
I view it as a demonstration on how light and inexpensive a fully mobile robot can be. It is remote controlled, but there is no reason why the human cannot be replaced with a AI driver. Imagine a agglomeration of Grok (or your AI of choice), self driving car AI and whatever new AI Musk is currently cooking up.

>>511400793 (OP)
No it won't you fucking kike

A short rundown of all the industry sectors that are going to get obliterated by AI and robots

>>511401556

The question here is how much "brain" you could feasibly fit into such a chassis. I mean, still kinda cool if you require several cogitator racks in your basement to pull the strings on the damn thing but autonomy is where it becomes really interesting ... for all practical purposes we can also consider a hybrid model here.

Invest in sensors.

>>511401618
rip lil guy

>>511400793 (OP)
Honestly, I think unitree is crap for balance / performance / quality.

But if they really turn this into an open platform, so you can program your own functions as add-ons, this will get big.

I cant believe microsoft killed cortana instead of doing that. Stubborn idiots.

>>511401618
He lost his hat. I too would be mad if I lost an awesome hat. It's perfectly understandable.

>>511401618
>when a girl talks to you and you remember your pockets are filled with scolding hot spaghetti

>>511401761
>The question here is how much "brain" you could feasibly fit into such a chassis.
The AI doesn't have to be onboard. They can be running on a remote server or the cloud and connect via wifi. Neurosama did that when driving the neurocar recently, though she was trying to run people over the whole time.

>>511400793 (OP)
I can see it now. In 15 years every product you own in your home will have a QR code. It will be mandatory for the robot to function until the tech gets better in 50 or so years. So you can sit there watching TV and yell at your robot from its charging station to make you a box of macaroni and cheese. The box, milk, butter, the stove and pan will all have codes on them as the robot shuffles on to them all to make your meal. I hope you are ready to see QR codes everywhere in your home

I think I am going to dress up my robomaid in a cute maid outfit, but also make it very clear I do not sex it.

>>511402352
>I hope you are ready to see QR codes everywhere in your home.
AI doesn't need QR codes to identify objects now. You can upload images to most of the available AI's now and it can see and identify what it is looking at. You can do it on your phone with Google Lens. Take a photo of something and it will do a search for that thing.
https://youtu.be/JmoFvtBBDJw

>>511402352
Yep and you better have a very clean kitchen because any bug that lands in your mac & cheese is getting mixed right in and served to you.

>>511402652
There is literally no robot in the world that can complete the task "go get me a box of mac & cheese from the pantry". Not one.

>>511401618
what? this is identical to a mongrel autistic walmart sprog with a bottom feeder bbc loving whore mom

>>511402213

Comms can be disrupted under field conditions. Might be less concern for a kitchen appliance but that would be a fancy toy after all. Different problem would be if a perimeter defense bot bumbles out of wifi range and just freezes up ... electronic warfare would be another issue. So how much limited autonomy would we need?

>though she was trying to run people over the whole time

Kinda cute. Now srsly, should not raise a bot on GTA, damnit.

>>511400793 (OP)
why would I want that? Can it clean the dishes and my house? No? Then fuck off.

>>511400793 (OP)
>BILLIONS will lose their jobs
thank GOD, bring on the benefits.
30yo is a ripe old age to retire.

>>511401618
It's going to be hilarious watching spergbots interact with blacks and jeets

>>511400793 (OP)
that's a drone not a robot, it requires a pilot/programmer to do anything
>robots are cheap as dirt
they aren't, currently no one is building them at scale, meaning one source for parts
>and don't require health insurance, dental or holidays
they do require specialized maintenance and a refit of work areas

robots are used in place of humans when they are actually less expensive, a tiny humanoid with all of those moving parts? that's more expensive than a human for any work that doesn't require full ppe

actual industrial robots are big reliable things with as few points of movement possible while being able to perform it's tasks

>>511401761
A lot, actually, considering that the brain doesn't even have to be in the head. It can store data on all limbs and torso.

>>511403987
>they do require specialized maintenance and a refit of work areas

Exactly! I am so sick of people looking at this using movie logic.
>they dont get tired!

Bitch, even your phone gets "tired".

>>511400793 (OP)
It'll all be over once AI becomes more intelligent and they start putting it in these robots.

>>511401092
It's a dream to attract investors*

*donors (you own nothing)

>>511404118
two more weeks !

>>511404004

True again. So at least for rote activities the worst limitation might just be battery life. Perhaps need to reconsider here ... what would be the minimum hardware requirement to allow adaptive response to novel inputs (which again is a pretty wide field, correct target identification sure takes less than deriving new complex chains of actions)?

>>511400793 (OP)
can i send these on an errand to buy groceries or go to the post office?

>>511404239
Hah, yeah, but probably more like 2 to 3 years once one of those AI companies achieve AGI.

>>511404266
A chaos core. For creativity in problem solving, used only in extreme circumstances, made up of random numbers generated by air pressure variations. Crystal data read and writes in one solid piece of glass, encoded in 4th dimensional mathematical compression code for long term storage, and a good chunk of ram. Easy as.

>>511401092
Of course not. Even a robot with only half the competence of a poojeet would cost as much as a stealth bomber.

>>511403987
most of /pol/ tards are brown retards, the rest are NEET faggots living on mommy funds
ofc they never saw a proper factory and ofc they dont know what actual robots look like

also they need a ton of grunts for maintenance and support, or specialized jannies to keep them from crashing all the time
"dark" factories are still a novelty and a niche just being tested
it wont work for a long time still

>>511404118
> putting AI in these robots.
There is no space for sophisticated AI in a robot the size of a human. They would have to be radio connected to AI data centers and this inevitable leads to latency and painfully slow decision making. The amount of energy required to make them judge and decide in even trivial new situations would be astronomical. It would be more practical to have them remote controlled by poojeets from call centers in Bangalore. The robots at least don't shit in the streets.

>>511404615
yeah it's pretty much only viable for high volume line fabrication/assembly
anything else and robots cost more per finished piece than just using human labor
androids ain't taking anyone's job, cept maybe the strippers at expos xD

>>511404615
dark factories are propaganda with no real economic value. Something like 90% of factory work has been automated since the 1970s, something as simple as truck drivers having larger trucks increases their productivity. Theres CNCs that load their own materials.
Completely reducing the need from workers to absolute zero gives you nothing in return, just extreme complexity to save on some salaries of few remaining workers. It has never existed, dark factories are just factories that go one step beyond and have less workers than usual. They will still have 9000 HR managers

>>511404885
didn't someone try to make an ai out of pajeets?
sure i remember some company competing with llms using crowdsourcing
like an upjumped everything squared painted brown and filled with microtasks

>>511404004
As if data storage was the problem. It's rather the lack of compute power and this won't be overcome with silicon based chips.

>>511404959
we are getting close though maintenance cycles are getting longer, errors are going down
it's got to the point that one mechanic and a couple of scrubs can run a modern factory for days at a time

no true autofactories yet but we're getting there

>>511401092

They are toys. Most of the videos of them are straight up photoshop, but look at the few real videos of them where they always half do something then fall over.
After falling over they flail around, that is because they are simply following a set of programmed moves and that is what those moves look like when the robot is crumbled on the floor. The robots are so basic they don't even know they've fallen over and cannot correct themselves.

>>511400793 (OP)
are you ready for loyal robot frens to replace all the fake normalfags in your life. just look how innocent it runs. it will never betray you

I'm trying to think why I would even need one of these.
1. Jack me off.
2. Carry my groceries when I go shopping.

And that's it. I have 0 use for these things.
I don't even have a use for home assistants like alexa or nest or whatever.

test

>>511407379
S.(compco6).knowl Base 777

That thing will be hackable within 2 hour, and will choke its owners like it's Chauvin.

>>511407419
wat

>>511400793 (OP)
It can't do anything. The boston dynamics robot can at least perform menial tasks (very slowly) Besides there's very little reason to have a humanoid robot. A purpose built robot is better. Like those robot servers already working in restaurants etc.

>>511403265
An amazon warehouse isnt a warzone. Comms wont be disrupted in a place like that.

beep boop

>>511400793 (OP)
This thing is just an expensive toy or coat hanger. It can't do anything useful at home or even outside.

>>511404443

>made up of random numbers generated by air pressure variations

What could possibly go wrong ... :3

>>511407740

Yeah but a damn warehouse does not need anything resembling a humanoid model. Just an elaborate clockwork "smart" enough to not trip over its own lack of legs. Rail-mounted grabby thingies, conveyors and forklifts. That is kinda boring.

>>511400793 (OP)
Looks like CG, and a bad one at that. Notice how it's not interacting with anything in the environment, just walking and doing cartwheels. It doesn't even leave marks on the grass.
Knowing China, the real one can do maybe a tenth of what's shown in the video.

>>511400793 (OP)
Just a word of advice - if the robot is doing the dishes, let it finish. Finding spare parts will be a bitch.