Thread 511408301 - /pol/ [Archived: 111 hours ago]

Anonymous ID: +wMcC3w/
7/26/2025, 12:52:41 PM No.511408301
1737023396380923
1737023396380923
md5: c5ef6b81ca4ab78eb26c547355b700f2🔍
nigger
Replies: >>511408641 >>511408838
Anonymous ID: /TLCTTDyGreece
7/26/2025, 12:54:34 PM No.511408409
1742744596526
1742744596526
md5: 6a7e30bbe36c974a51d947df2ae5be73🔍
MEDBROS
Replies: >>511408654
Anonymous ID: /TLCTTDyGreece
7/26/2025, 12:55:05 PM No.511408429
1611690682081
1611690682081
md5: 2031424285c8d42740f21b36071e6ac8🔍
IT'S OVER
Anonymous ID: yhG/KRWtUnited States
7/26/2025, 12:56:00 PM No.511408484
....at 52:30 in this video Joe Biden can be audibly heard saying "do you know how horny it makes me to be standing next to a 13 yr old girl"
And later "talk to my daughter Ashley about the video"

(turn your volume all the way up in order to hear it, ideally using headphones)

>https://www.c-span.org/video/?323601-1/senate-ceremonial-swearing

This video is from the 2015 senate swearing in Tim Coons. That's Coons' daughter he's doing that to. Right in front of her parents. So politicians are pimping their daughters out around Washington DC.

If Trump wanted to win in 2020 he could have shared this audio and had a slam dunk victory. The end. No doubt that he'd win. But he didn't do that. Why?
Anonymous ID: /TLCTTDyGreece
7/26/2025, 12:56:11 PM No.511408497
1476386704993 (1)
1476386704993 (1)
md5: 4858c7111acd0c5f75b8c15eb94908d0🔍
Anonymous ID: m7PlRTWZ
7/26/2025, 12:58:32 PM No.511408616
hqdefault(1)
hqdefault(1)
md5: d88b75516f4ed97355a257c02ad9cc36🔍
Why was the V2 rocket painted in FREE MASONIC checkerboard scheme, bros?

And why didn't they put ears and a tail on it?
Anonymous ID: z+94/kGeSlovenia
7/26/2025, 12:58:55 PM No.511408641
>>511408301 (OP)
Now post Germans 100 years ago.
Anonymous ID: oBRFYmpkNepal
7/26/2025, 12:59:08 PM No.511408654
>>511408409
Based on a deeper analysis using available data, the claim from the post, attributed to Charles Murray's 2003 book *Human Accomplishment*, that 97% of recorded human accomplishment since the 14th century came from individuals born in a specific European region, warrants scrutiny. Murray's methodology involved quantifying achievement by measuring the space allocated to notable figures in encyclopedias and reference works, focusing on fields like science, art, and philosophy from 800 BC to 1950. His findings highlight a concentration of notable figures in Western Europe, particularly in areas like Britain, France, Germany, and Italy, which aligns with the map in the post.

However, several critical points emerge. First, the methodology relies heavily on Western-authored sources, which may overrepresent European contributions due to better documentation and preservation of records in that region, especially post-Renaissance. Critics argue this creates a self-fulfilling prophecy, as accomplishments in non-Western cultures (e.g., China’s invention of paper or India’s development of zero) might be underrepresented if they weren’t as extensively chronicled in Western texts. Murray acknowledges this potential bias but asserts his approach corrects for it, though some scholars question the adequacy of these adjustments, noting the exclusion of non-Western compendiums or lost works from less affluent cultures.
Replies: >>511408682
Anonymous ID: oBRFYmpkNepal
7/26/2025, 12:59:40 PM No.511408682
>>511408654
Second, the time frame (14th century onward) coincides with Europe’s rise in literacy, printing, and institutional support for recording achievements, which may skew the data. Earlier global contributions—such as those from the Islamic Golden Age (8th-13th centuries) or ancient China—are less emphasized, possibly due to sparse surviving records rather than lack of accomplishment. The map’s focus on Europe also ignores the global context, where innovations often built on cross-cultural exchanges, like the transmission of numerals from India to the Arab world and then Europe.

Finally, Murray’s conclusion about a decline in accomplishment post-19th century, partly tied to diminishing returns and cultural factors, is speculative and lacks the empirical rigor of his earlier data, raising doubts about the overall narrative. While the data reflects a historical concentration of recorded genius in Europe, it’s likely an artifact of documentation bias rather than a definitive measure of global human potential. The 97% figure, while striking, should be seen as a reflection of historical record-keeping rather than an absolute truth about human achievement.
Anonymous ID: faKQibvc
7/26/2025, 1:02:31 PM No.511408838
Família de Foguetes Argentinos
Família de Foguetes Argentinos
md5: e02d5a79ee901c2f9613832b02395ffc🔍
>>511408301 (OP)
meds 7 years ago

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wwFQXDDZgf4