why was this a bad thing?
imagine if we could make profiles of people who post on this board without their consent
wouldn't it increase the board quality immensely?

> imagine if we could make profiles of people who post on this board without their consent

so your argument is that k1w1farms is a good thing and should be allowed to exist right?

>>511442555 (OP)
just make your own app. call it i'm a yuge faggot with zero security

>>511442555 (OP)
they curbstomped make.app and coalfax
fuck them (not literally) but ackshaually yes
lol

>>511442555 (OP)
>imagine if we could make profiles of people who post on this board without their consent
it is entirely possible and already being done

>>511442658
if you could check my post history, wouldn't you do it right now? especially now that I posted something you probably deem "bait" or "low quality"?
wouldn't it be a good thing if you could monitor all I've posted and police people so that they don't post low quality shit?

>>511442555 (OP)
I agree. To use 4chan people should be required to give an ID, otherwise the quality will just decrease and hate speech will spread. Maybe they should add facial recognition software as well to notify police if someone posts something bad.

>>511442555 (OP)
Imagine if we created a database on every woman and rated them on how big of a soulless whore they were.

>>511442880
I reckon if they added hairline/height/weight verification and nothing else, you yourself, someone who values privacy, would not only give all that info willingly but also demand everyone else post that info publicly

>>511442796
You just described reddit. Go back there if you like that type of shit.

>>511443027
yeah but this site's anonymity is what allows me to keep posting here with impunity
wouldn't it be great if we could quickly identify redditors on this site using some sort of profile or post history so we can filter them with 99% accuracy?

there's apps like this in China where people snitch to the government on their own friends and neighbors.

palantir wants a slice of that pie in this country

I created a Tea app for men called Body Count, for men only. I was denied approval on the app stores because it violates privacy rules. I appealed and said it was exactly like Tea app, but for men, and they terminated my developer license account too.

When we did the same thing for coal burners, they shut it down

>>511444445

No way. We Def live in a women daycare.

>>511442555 (OP)
1. The OP is a female, seeking to divide and conquer.
2. Do you think you were slandered or defamed online? Anons, why aren't you starting your own lawfare cell? Attached is a simple template for political action.
>100% legal
>Low cost
> very effective
> simple execution: either get a female ally, use ai, or hire a PI to investigate the apps and sites on your behalf and collate forensic data usable for operations. it doesn't matter that they might delete accounts after seeing this message; the application and Facebook itself always retain the information on their servers and that is accessible through subpoena. so it is already too late for them; they thought they were anonymous, but nothing disappears from the internet, for better or worse.
> collect the data in a forensically retrievable format
> find a law Anon to push cases forward as per targets of opportunity
> saturate and destroy enemy legal defenses, targeting decision makers and corporations particularly
> possible attack vectors for class action suits are opening.
>who am I?
just a guy running my own 100% legal implementation of this plan. you should do the same.
>Lawfare cell? I'm not reading your big ass song in desktop mode.
Okay. so if you're a guy who is injured or measurably defamed or slandered by actions taken by people on these websites or apps, you can start your own cell. that will involve either hiring somebody or figuring out how to get on those sites, figure out what they said about you, record that information, and then work with other anons to prepare lawsuits. there are other opportunities for class action and group suits which can cause a cultural change. the time for a shift has come.
>is this anti woman?
no, it is for equality and fairness. we seek to reunify man and woman, as our enemies hate a happy family more than life itself. part of healing is justice, so that's what this is. we hope you like it.

>>511442555 (OP)
because it's just coalfax for women and r/femcel or whatever full of buttugly femcels.

it'd be different if Tea was full of hot women, then it would be a force to reckon with

>>511442705
Why won't the magnet links that I search on X work?

>coalfax
they went as far to call that "terrorism" too

>>511442555 (OP)
Crazy bitches are already dangerously good at stalking WITHOUT an app doing all the work for you

because this makes dating even worse for the average/ugly men and better for the handsome/wealthy ones
the men on the top of the food chain are already fucking like never before,now add women preventing others to fuck a man because hes going bald,the ones who win is not the women,is the top men getting their dick sucked regardless this app exists or not

>>511443234
>yeah but this site's anonymity is what allows me to keep posting here with impunity
And that's a good thing

>>511442880
We don't need the whole face, just a "show nose" feature that can double as a "brown check".
Jews, niggers and jeets get a special flag so we know what opinions to discard.

>>511443234
No you retard. The whole point of being anon is it forces you to at least partially focus on the content of an argument rather than the content of the person because the 2 aren't always linked at the hip. Horrible people can tell truths and great people can tell utter lies.
When you appeal to someone's background instead of appealing to logic itself, you can easily get a warped view of things. It's part of why our world is so fucked up because people use someone's credentials as the only reason they could be right/wrong about something when there's other ways to vet that information and corroborate it.

>>511442683
An app with gender-mirrored functionality would never pass inspection on any store.

>>511442555 (OP)
Women can input their own narratives to the app? How did this app not immediately get sued for
- libel/slander ("he's a rapist!")
- harassment/cyberbulling ("he has a small dick!")
- doxxing ("this douche works at Chipotle on 8th Street!")

Women aren't objective enough to create a "safety" app. It would just be a "petty revenge" app.

>>511446012
Well said

>>511444445
I don't care about this topic, just checkin these badass quints.

>>511442555 (OP)
>why was this a bad thing?
Women were using this app to privately doxx and share information, as well as lies, about men.
>>511442658
KF is a public gossip board with no pretenses of "avoiding red flags" or is at all related to the retarded post-iPhone, post-Facebook normalfag dating market. All they do is talk about and gawk at lolcows. The farmers aren't "spilling the tea" about random men within the context of whether or not want they want to date/bone them.

>>511447239
you'd be surprised how untrue your last sentence is

>>511442555 (OP)
It's not a bad thing in theory. In practice it's an attempt to solve a problem that was already solved thousands of years ago. Even if the leak didn't happen, it was going to fail anyway. Women wouldn't even be able to use the app properly, while it might be useful for a minority, for the vast majority of women it's an opportunity to gossip and be really petty examples:

If a man breaks up with her, then she'll go there to try to 'ruin him' because she feels upset.
If there are guys that aren't actually dangerous, they're just socially awkward retards, women will also get a kick out of shaming and running them down, which will ruin that man's chances of ever improving.

If a young woman wants to "avoid red flags", here's what she can do:

>Remain chaste and don't have sex before marriage.
>Ensure that the suitor is vetted by her immediate family.
>Any suitors need to ask for her father's permission to marry
Cuts out 99% of the "red flags" women will face. Women think they can just fuck a guy they just met, who they feel primal attraction for and then wonder why that same guy is also getting with other women at the same time or that he never called her, etc. It's retarded.