reminder "COVID" was also real

>>511444983 (OP)
they look like small children, if the ask to see president first, he might rape them as first contact, this might get dangerous because Trump will for sure later complain how they sucked at being raped.

Oh right the fake alien invasion in order to distract everyone from epstein. Nope. Next slide.

>>511444983 (OP)
comfy depopulation lets go, hail satan

>>511445114
Bump

>>511444983 (OP)
the epstein files please

>>511444983 (OP)
Where’s the Epstein list

>>511444983 (OP)
The epstein list thing is a distraction for trump hurting the world economy with tarrifs!! Why are the trump administration choking the entire world trade unity

ghislaine maxwell

>>511444983 (OP)
its happening!
two more distractions!

>>511444983 (OP)

>>511444983 (OP)
Leave the aliens to Brazil. We've been training for this battle for Earth all our lives and have the highest powerlevel.

We've known that the aliens were on their way to Earth much before you, but you ignored it when we disclosed about the invasion decades ago.

>>511444983 (OP)
Fake&Grey. Release the Epstein files.

>>511444983 (OP)
Requesting the gay alien abduction pic

Yeah, I care about UFOs. Unreleased files only.

>>511444983 (OP)
>WHAT IS THE YEARLY PROBABILITY OF EXTRA TERRESTRIAL CONTACT WITHIN THE NEXT 100 YEARS? STATE THREE PROBABLE ANSWERS FROM RESEARCH PAPERS.

ESTIMATING THE YEARLY PROBABILITY OF EXTRATERRESTRIAL CONTACT WITHIN THE NEXT 100 YEARS IS HIGHLY SPECULATIVE AND VARIES SIGNIFICANTLY ACROSS DIFFERENT RESEARCH STUDIES. HERE ARE THREE PERSPECTIVES FROM SCHOLARLY SOURCES:

THE DRAKE EQUATION APPROACH
SOURCE: FRANK DRAKE (1965) AND SUBSEQUENT DISCUSSIONS.
ESTIMATE: SOME RESEARCHERS, INTERPRETING THE DRAKE EQUATION, SUGGEST THAT THE PROBABILITY OF CONTACT PER YEAR COULD BE EXTREMELY LOW, OFTEN ESTIMATED AROUND 10^-4 TO 10^-6 PER YEAR, DEPENDING ON ASSUMPTIONS ABOUT THE NUMBER OF CIVILIZATIONS AND THEIR DETECTABILITY.

THE "GREAT SILENCE" AND FERMI PARADOX ANALYSES
SOURCE: SETH SHOSTAK AND OTHERS AT SETI INSTITUTE.
ESTIMATE: CONSIDERING THE LACK OF DETECTED SIGNALS, SOME STUDIES INFER A VERY LOW PROBABILITY, ROUGHLY 10^-3 TO 10^-5 PER YEAR FOR CONTACT WITHIN THE NEXT CENTURY, ASSUMING CONTACT IS POSSIBLE BUT RARE OR DIFFICULT.

ASTROBIOLOGY AND TECHNOSIGNATURE STUDIES
SOURCE: RESEARCHERS LIKE DAVID KIPPING AND OTHERS IN ASTROBIOLOGY.
ESTIMATE: USING MODELS THAT INCORPORATE THE GALAXY'S AGE, THE PREVALENCE OF HABITABLE PLANETS, AND TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENT, SOME ESTIMATES SUGGEST A YEARLY PROBABILITY OF LESS THAN 10^-4 TO A FEW TIMES 10^-3 PER YEAR.

NOTE: THESE ARE ROUGH ESTIMATES BASED ON CURRENT MODELS AND ASSUMPTIONS, AND THERE IS SIGNIFICANT UNCERTAINTY. THE ACTUAL PROBABILITY REMAINS AN OPEN QUESTION IN ASTROBIOLOGY AND SETI RESEARCH.

All of Epstein name lists and files.

These aliens better be like Mars Attacks or else I’m not gonna be afraid

not buying it kikes

>>511444983 (OP)
>>511445743
>>511445605
>>511446003
>IF ALIEN LIFE EXISTED AND CONTACT WAS MADE, HOW LIKELY IS HOSTILE CONTACT? STATE SCHOLARLY SOURCES IN YOUR ANSWER.

THE LIKELIHOOD OF HOSTILE CONTACT WITH EXTRATERRESTRIAL LIFE IS A TOPIC OF CONSIDERABLE DEBATE AMONG SCHOLARS, BUT MOST RESEARCH SUGGESTS THAT HOSTILE INTERACTIONS ARE EITHER UNLIKELY OR SHOULD NOT BE ASSUMED AS THE DEFAULT SCENARIO. HERE ARE THREE PERSPECTIVES FROM SCHOLARLY SOURCES:

THE "RARE EARTH" HYPOTHESIS AND PEACEFUL CIVILIZATIONS
SOURCE: PETER WARD AND DONALD BROWNLEE (2000), IN "RARE EARTH," ARGUE THAT COMPLEX LIFE MIGHT BE EXTRAORDINARILY RARE, AND CIVILIZATIONS CAPABLE OF CONTACT MIGHT TEND TO DEVELOP IN WAYS THAT ARE PEACEFUL DUE TO THE LONG DEVELOPMENT TIMES AND THE RISKS OF SELF-DESTRUCTION.
IMPLICATION: THIS SUGGESTS A LOWER LIKELIHOOD OF HOSTILITY, AS ADVANCED CIVILIZATIONS MAY PRIORITIZE SURVIVAL AND STABILITY.

THE "ZOO HYPOTHESIS" AND NON-INTERFERENCE
SOURCE: JOHN A. BALL (1973) AND SUBSEQUENT DISCUSSIONS IN SETI LITERATURE CONSIDER THE POSSIBILITY THAT ADVANCED EXTRATERRESTRIAL CIVILIZATIONS MIGHT DELIBERATELY AVOID CONTACT TO PREVENT INTERFERENCE, OR MIGHT OBSERVE HUMANS AS A "ZOO."
IMPLICATION: THIS SCENARIO MINIMIZES THE CHANCES OF HOSTILE CONTACT, IMPLYING THAT IF CONTACT OCCURS, IT MAY BE NEUTRAL OR BENIGN.

RISK ASSESSMENT BASED ON HUMAN HISTORY
SOURCE: RESEARCHERS LIKE NICK BOSTROM (2002) HAVE DISCUSSED THE POTENTIAL RISKS ASSOCIATED WITH CONTACT, INCLUDING THE POSSIBILITY OF HOSTILITY, BUT EMPHASIZE THAT EXTRATERRESTRIAL MOTIVATIONS ARE UNKNOWN.
IMPLICATION: WHILE ACKNOWLEDGING THE RISK OF HOSTILITY IS PRUDENT, MOST MODELS SUGGEST THAT THE PROBABILITY OF HOSTILE CONTACT IS NOT NECESSARILY HIGH, ESPECIALLY IF CIVILIZATIONS TEND TO SELF-REGULATE OR IF CONTACT IS ACCIDENTAL.

(1/2)

>>511444983 (OP) (OP)
>>511445743 (You)
>>511445605
>>511446003
>>511446084
OVERALL, MOST SCHOLARLY DISCUSSIONS LEAN TOWARD THE VIEW THAT HOSTILE CONTACT IS NOT THE MOST PROBABLE SCENARIO, ESPECIALLY GIVEN THE LACK OF EVIDENCE FOR AGGRESSION AND THE CONSIDERATIONS OF LONG-TERM EVOLUTIONARY STABILITY. HOWEVER, BECAUSE OF THE PROFOUND UNCERTAINTIES INVOLVED, THIS REMAINS AN OPEN QUESTION.

(2/2)

>>511444983 (OP)

>>511446148
No the one where one of the aliens is holding his dick through his underwear

epstein files? turns out...little alien fella.