Will you accept the mark of the beast to you use the internet too?

Not having a soul does that

>>512007156 (OP)
People have been showing their face on social media for decades now.
What's the big deal?

>>512007156 (OP)
God save our gracious King
Long live our noble King
God save the King

>>512007156 (OP)
did he even tattoo his eyeballs? how the hell do you sit still for that

>>512007532
Facebook was a mistake

>>512007532
I don't. I've never showed my face on social media, normalfag

>>512007532

Its beeing forced on you this time. Its a pretty big deal.

Kek, sad cunt

>>512007156 (OP)
imagine willing to put that much pain and money into how you look but you're still fat, somehow hours of getting needled in the eye is worse than a push up

>>512007532
Not me. When I was 12 my sister made an arsebook account for me and I didn't know what the fuck she was doing or why I "needed" what ever she was doing. I never used it. And when I figured out what social media was and how it disrespected their users a couple of years later I deleted it. Never had a social media account again. So that would be 14 years ago

As for other people who do post their mug on social media, they chose to do that their. That doesn't mean they want every transaction or internet activity directly tied to them. You should be free to chose that. The "big deal" is this is being used for tyranny. We know how the government want to jail people for merely saying the wrong thing, or how they want to impose other tyrannical laws even on what you consume or see or do. making it a requirement to show your face to use the internet is a tool they will utilise to control society, and not for the better

>>512007986
The tattoos are all terrible too.

>TAKE OFF YOUR FACEMASK

grim.

>>512007156 (OP)
I’m not surprised, anyone who does that to themselves is obviously mentally deficient.

>”hello, my name is Dave and I’ve spent thousands of pounds and hundreds of hours painting my face blue.”

How am I supposed to take this seriously.

Drugs wear off, do dies booze, a slight tattoo malfunction is a bad choice.

This is not good.

>>512007156 (OP)
These are the freaks submitting ID verification to commercial porn sites. Probably also jeets and groids.

You can literally just put makeup over it

>>512007156 (OP)
Is this a defense against facial recognition?

>normies will comply
>again

Now I know how Romans felt when they rolled up on these bog people.

>>512010233
The tattoos are just as identifying.

People are just judging VEO 3 to make people to verify lol. It's not hard to bypass at all.

>>512007156 (OP)
Well, it's not wrong. He should tear that shit off of his face.

>>512007532
The part where people are now obliged to do so against their will.
And yes you can stop using those websites and stop using the internet and stop using your phone and stop using a computer and completely ghost out of society, of course you can.
Most people are still attached to these toys.

>>512007156 (OP)
How will he goon??????

>>512007156 (OP)
most individual entities like him will experience "Technical difficulties, please try again later" and similar responses for ever. While members of the system will have uninterrupted Service.
This is just a polite way of letting him know that he fucked up and should not have mocked the deciples of Yaldabaoth in their own divine home and expect to be able to continue this till the end of all days. Absolutely preposterous.
"Take of your face mask". lmao. This is what larping with the eye of providence on your forehead and edgy dyed eyeballs gets you.

>>512007156 (OP)
Oh no anyways

>>512011078
Probably HP will adapt to the newest contemporary trend ( like he did with his "body modification" lol ) and hang around the Kebab shops of Rothenham or just sign up to become a Bobby there, who knows

>>512007156 (OP)
Fuck digital IDs anyways, people who support digital IDs are just a bunch of faggots.

WHEN THE CURE IS EVEN WORST THAN THE DESEASE

>>512007532
Facebook doesn't throw you in jail for your opinions. The UK government does.

>>512007156 (OP)
>that creep watches porn
Imagine my shock.
Watching porn is the common link between all of the disgusting homos, trannies and other freaks.

>>512007156 (OP)
>satans tattoo ink makes you immune to satans internet face scans

what did satan mean by this

>>512013174
It means Jesus was right about everything.

>>512007532
Now it's being linked to which websites you have visited. You are doing half the work of surveiling youself and thus this scheme makes surveillance cheaper.

>>512013283
It's like you don't know what cookies are.

>>512007156 (OP)
Get a new head, loser. I think the muzzies at France are selling them though.

>>512008356
demanding little shit isn't it?

>>512007156 (OP)
Why are white people like this?

>>512007156 (OP)
Why do Brits look like pigs now?

The vast majority of beliefs about Britain on here are false. You guys people literally any fake news so long as it depicts Britain as completely hellish inhuman wasteland. It's what you all want to believe. It's so bizarre whenever I'm in a thread and I get some American who thinks he knows Britain better than me, and that he thinks he has access to some secret information because he got psyop'd online by some demoralisation slop.

>>512014811

You sound like a massive fag

>>512008356
Talk about guaranteed depression
Reminds me of when iPhones asked Asians to open their eyes

>>512007156 (OP)
I wonder if you could use a lifelike head to fool facial recognition.

>>512014811
Good morning, nudge unit officer.

>>512015183
I'm actually an oldfag. There's no reason a nudge unit would give a single fuck about what non-Brits think about Britain. You aren't the target, we are.

>>512007156 (OP)
you can only afford to eat in brazil if you steal

>>512007617
gosh you guys are fucking retarded

>>512014952
you sound fat and brown

>>512015183
he's right, but he's also wrong. britain IS dystopian, but no more or less than the USA, which had the biggest mass civilian spying campaign in history pulled on them, and yet no one holds their feet to the fire about that or concern trolls endlessly on fagholes like this about how nightmarish and dystopian it is there. same way the chinks eat fucking bird fetuses and stinky rotten black eggs but only britain gets shit for stuff like jellied eels.

I hope it tells a nigger to
>take off the baboon mask
or a jew to
>take off the fake nose

>>512016384
I dont revel in filth with lower class so such concepts as black sclera are foreign to me

>>512007156 (OP)
just make a fake face using ai

To think, he could have went with some classy tattoos.

>>512014811
So people aren't going to prison for Facebook posts?

>>512017709
Don't Motte and Bailey me, anon. Have some self-respect.

>>512007532
Kike shill acting like he doesn't know why in order to fool the goyim. What cunts these kikes are.

>>512007532
fuck you kike show flag you nigger

>>512010249
THIS THIS THIS
Normaltards be like
>oh well, that's how things are now
FUCKING RETARDS
LITERALLY SLAVE CATTLE
NOT EVEN ONE ATTEMPT TO SAY "NO"

>>512007644
Lifelog is doing as it was intended to do.

>>512007532
t normalnigger

>>512007156 (OP)
remember ladies and gentlemen, tin foil disrupts the facial recognition software. so if you wear sunglasses you can wrap some foil around the bridge of the glasses to scramble it.

>>512022389
I cover my face in Lemon juice, that works as well.

>>512022389

>>512007156 (OP)
>take off your face mask
>https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_asNhzXq72w

>>512023079

>>512015000

>>512007156 (OP)
maybe it's not age check, but sanity and intellect check. in that case the system works just fine

>>512011078
This

>>512007532
>People have been showing their face on social media for decades now. What's the big deal?

>People have been donating money to charity for decades now. What's the big deal with tax hikes?
>People have been eating bugs for decades now. What's the big deal with banning beef?
>People have been circumcised for decades now. What's the big deal with medically mandating it?
>People have been taking pain meds for decades now. What's the big deal with enforced prescriptions?
>People have been married via arrangement for decades now. What's the big deal with institutionalized matchmaking?
>People have been taking advice for decades now. What's the big deal with mind control?

>>512007532
Imagine if social media jailed you for saying Trump is bad (if you are a leftist) or feminism is bad (if you are right wing) anywhere on the Internet and you had to input your personal info if you want to go online. Would you be fine with that?

>>512007156 (OP)
>accept the mark of the beast to you use the internet
To the Library

>>512007156 (OP)
what's the problem? the UK has free speech, what could possibly happen? what is the government going to do,prosecute users for stating opinions online?

>>512007156 (OP)

OY... you seem to like the younger women and them farting... We need to evaluate your Teaching license... the AI says people who like porn like this are 0.00001% more likely than average to abuse young women... so you understand that we will revoke your teaching license... just for safety sake
God Save The King!

>>512007156 (OP)
Some people don't need to be online and if they physically are incapable of doing so I am fine with that.
In fact, there should be a WEIGHT limit to get internet access.