And it's not just selection because there would be regression to the mean after a generation, and yet White + Asian Indian is higher IQ than White.

indians are widely considered EXTREMELY ugly so it takes a lot to want to breed with them.

personally even if an indian lady invented the cure for cancer i wouldnt be able to get erect for her. disgusting.

selection + studyceling + they're disprortionately urban professionals

>>512011001 (OP)
n=41
imagine trying to make a population-wide inference on 41 samples
kek retard

>>512012194
Also, where is this data coming from?

>>512011001 (OP)
the indians we import by the millions are required to have a college STEM degree. Which requires them to be above average intelligence. This skews the statistics.

where are jews, did you clip them off the top?

>>512012344
why was the number of whites tested more than all the others combined and how do statistical averages work?

>>512012258
>>512012424
Honestly, shit sample sizes and parents education level are the only things that can be gleaned from this.

>>512012838
I agree that it's probably exaggerated but the suggestion that Asian immigrants are selected for intelligence is at least plausible. As usual attaining a definitive answer to this question is impossible because lib researchers consider it a moral imperative to run cover for blacks

>>512011001 (OP)
>And it's not just selection

Except that is exactly what this data set is showing via the parental education years.

Turns out the children of wealthy Engineers and doctors are smarter than the kids of everyday normal people. Who would have thought?

White & Asian Indian with 16.72 years of parental education have an IQ of 109.64. Meanwhile full Asian Indians with 16.77 years of parental education only have 103.25. The data set is similar sized 41 vs 50. This alone shits on your Superior human capital theory. Turns out when one of the parents is an educated white person instead of a regular bumpkin white, the offspring benefits compared to full Indians kids. Hence white genes boosted the offspring.

Meanwhile notice how the full Korean & Japanese have an IQ greater than White & Korean/Japanese? This means East Asians actually do have higher IQs than whites according to this data set. If you had a similar data point with Asian Indians I would bite.

>>512012424
And the ones with fake degrees who end up becoming Uber drivers (the plan all along)?

>>512014268
/thread

>>512011001 (OP)
Whites are stupid as shit. Dead serious

cope all you want indians IQ mog

Blacks athletics mog

Where is this from?

>>512011001 (OP)
Its the cowshit.

>>512014268
Came back to add some sanity checks on the data of biracial IQ estimates by simple interpolations:

> predicted Mulatto IQ: (100+83.04)/2=91.52; Actual = 91.87
> predicted Chinese & White: (110.76+100)/2 = 105.38; actual = 104.88
> predicted Korean/Japanese &White: (112.23+100)/2 = 106.115; actual = 106.26
> predicted Native American &White: (90.1+100)/2 = 95.05; actual = 95.65

> predicted Indian &White: (103.25+100)/2 = 101.625; actual = 109.64
> predicted Filipino &White: (102.79+100)/2 = 101.625; actual = 104.6

The last two stand out since it appears the white parents is higher than the average.

Predicted White parent IQ in the white/Indian relationship would be at 116.03
Predicted White parent IQ in the White/Filipino relationship would be at 106.41

My takeaway is educated Indians and Filipinos date up. Could also be that the only Indians who can score a white spouse are "CEO" level.
Meanwhile top shelf East Asians date normie chad whites, AKA typical AMWF gooner-boomer couples.

>what explains pajeet high scores
cheating
next question

>>512011001 (OP)
Cheaters. They still speak English with a hideous accent that is not even understood by other Pajeets.
Meanwhile the East Asians do have an accent, but is barely noticeable.

>>512015734
it's really lame how hard you try to load your post with this superficial internet rizz fluff. can't stop me reading it in your dad's accent pajeet

good news everyone!

there's still another 2/3 of india's [documented] population waiting for their turn to repeat all the online pajeetism we've enjoyed so far. all of it and more! woohoo

>>512011001 (OP)
The best genetics on planet Earth. After you feed indic men with a high protein diet the height grows to 6 feet plus and the IQ becomes sky high. This race of CEOs is unstoppable.

Why do we come to the West?

Because it's easier to compete with you whites.

it's very apparent that a large number of you have recently been given that line to say.
ludicrous dung clones

>>512011001 (OP)
>there would be regression to the mean after a generation
1. Regression to the mean doesn't necessarily happen in one generation.
A kid of 2 smart niggers is still gonna be smarter than a regular nigger.
2. Environment has an effect too.
White + Indian means that that kid probably has upper middle class parents.
The White dude probably met Pajeeta in his Compsci course.
Any Jeet with a White girl is gonna be very rich and successful.

3. Jeets are racially diverse, you have the near full blooded caucasions and the absolute subhumans in the same country.

IQ tests can be cheated.

>>512011001 (OP)
>sample size 50.
>3 points higher than average white
>average indians can't move to united states.
>not being Africans.
Explained it all.

>>512023167
>Why do we come to the West?
>Because it's easier to compete with you whites.
yes because whites do not have high enough in-group preference so that allows you to take over white instituions.

>>512027621
Where's R?

>>512011001 (OP)
How can a scientist be so corrupt that they don't even collect data on the gender of those being tested? Or their educational level? Or a thousand other things? Interpretation is completely impossible, or rather, worthless, without more data.