How do you respond without sounding mad?

>>512033024 (OP)
HAHAHAH BASED TUCKER

>>512033024 (OP)
Post a Wojack edit of the gay Mexican as a chud and me the Chad. That’s how you beat zoomers. Bonus points for a tiktok edit with 50 filters and slowed phonk with a monologue in the background

>>512033024 (OP)
what's his beef with fuentes?

>>512033437
Fuentes revealed that his dad was CIA

>>512033024 (OP)
At least we know who's pushing the "gay fuentes" meme on /pol/ .. cia glowniggers

zoomers on suicide watch

>>512033024 (OP)
Not an argument.

Nick clips:

>>>/wsg/5924309

https://rumble.com/v6r1sau-the-jfk-assassination-goes-deeper-than-you-think.html

https://rumble.com/v5eq7ml-what-really-happened-on-911.html

https://rumble.com/v6px2ww-the-epstein-files-release-is-a-huge-disappointment.html

https://rumble.com/v6v5x9h-the-entire-history-of-israel-explained.html

>>512033024 (OP)
why do people listen to this fake and gay shit from these "commentators"? i don't care about the drama they invent between themselves or their opinions on the world. it literally does not matter

>>512033437
Nick Fuentes shilled Laura Loomer for almost 10 years while attacking people like Patrick Little, Shiloh Hendrix, and all American Protestants.

>>512033437
Fuentes is CIA

>>512033437
Tucker is CIA

>>512033574
>>512033764

>>512033437
All groyptards do is attack other people on the right nonstop

I don't know how anyone can take Tucker seriously after this episode. Especially after watching Fuentes break down all his claims. Tucker is obviously a completely fraud and a grifting liar, and likely controlled op as well.
Nothing that comes out of his mouth should ever be taken seriously again. An absolute joke of a political commentator.

>>512033437
fuentes is a spic gay faggot with AIDS

>>512034208

>>512033947
Huehuehue

>>512034206
fuentes is an irrelevant nobody with no real life influence hahaha

>>512034239
you didnt deny it, very telling!

>>512034284
Yeah only that mainstream media figures regularly talk about him, and he lives in all conservative media influencers' heads rent free.
He torpedo'd Joe Kent's campaign which is why Tucker was so mad at him, and Tucker even talks about this in the interview.

>>512034284
>fuentes is an irrelevant nobody
Which is why someone like Tucker is talking about him.
>you didnt deny it, very telling!
pic

>>512033024 (OP)
I mean, is he wrong?

>>512033024 (OP)
Fuentes is actually ostracized by MAGA.
Show the clip of him being kicked out of Turning Point.

>>512034396
>mainstream media figures regularly talk about him
calling him a weirdo fag. Remember when spic fuentes said he will infiltrate the GOP? or that they will overtake it by wearing oversized suits and shouting memes at politicians? HAHAHA what a joke. He only cares about his little grift. No integrity or real ideas. He basicaly repeats TRS talking points 6 months past their expiration date and acts edgy. Im sure he makes all his brownoid christcuck pay pigs proud!

>>512033437
I'm CIA

>>512034490
>Which is why someone like Tucker is talking about him.
because its cool and fun shitting on closeted gay dudes

>>512033024 (OP)
NICKERS ON SUICIDE WATCH

>>512034613
Weird how everyone on the internet is cia.... but I live in a glownigger area and don’t know one cia agent

>>512033437
This post triggered the glowies

>Tucker shits on Nick and calls him a faggot
Okay I gotta see this

>>512033024 (OP)
Groypers are either gay or bots. Fuentes is gay and a fed.

Groypers have not come to the conclusion the holocaust didnt happen through their critical thinking skills, they are just cultists following their gay leader. Fuentes is there to make everyone on the right look bad.

Qtard bots designed to make the right look retarded fell off and were replaced with groypers.

Fuentes doesnt have real viewers. Tons of the youtubers, sloptubers, normie streamers etc all used botted viewers and a little bit of networking to look bigger on their platforms. Tons of the bots spam 1 emote to make the chat move. For some of them, being in the top viewed channels indeed attracted an audience (xQC). But for others, they fell off as everyone saw through it (Fousey).

>>512034716
Because they're at home on their computers browsing 4chan all day.

>>512034009
this is just you endlessly blackpilling and feeling like there's no legitimate actors. Either you believe this, or you are using this as a sort of hedge against nick actually winning this encounter by poisoning the well. Either way, you're a faggot

>>512033024 (OP).

He is right about (((Fuentes.)))

>>512034060
Good. The right is gay and cringe and full of controlled opposition

PROOF nick is gay

>>512033479
So was Tucker's
At least Tucker has kids, though, so he's verifiably less gay.

Has Fuentes ever admitted being wrong about anything? I've seen Tucker admit on multiple interviews how he was wrong and regrets positions he held previously in almost those exact words.

>>512034750
>Groypers are either gay or bots. Fuentes is gay and a fed.
>Groypers have not come to the conclusion the holocaust didnt happen through their critical thinking skills, they are just cultists following their gay leader. Fuentes is there to make everyone on the right look bad.
>Qtard bots designed to make the right look retarded fell off and were replaced with groypers.
>Fuentes doesnt have real viewers. Tons of the youtubers, sloptubers, normie streamers etc all used botted viewers and a little bit of networking to look bigger on their platforms. Tons of the bots spam 1 emote to make the chat move. For some of them, being in the top viewed channels indeed attracted an audience (xQC). But for others, they fell off as everyone saw through it (Fousey).