>>512074965I will confirm she's a 4 using math.
5 - 50% of people
4/6 - 25% of people
3/7 - 12.5% of people
2/8 -6.75% of people
1/9 - 3.375% of peolpe
0/10 - Dead or Angel.
Face = 3 pt
Body (Tits, Ass, Build, Curves, Hips, Fat distribution etc) = 7 pt
Above average face + average body = 6.
1 Above Average body part + average face = 6
Above average face + above average body = 7
Gorgeous face + Well Sculpted Body = 8.
Super model face + super model body = 9
Genetic specimen face + body = 9.5
Sydney Sweeney has one of the ugliest faces i've seen but i'll give her a 1.5 on that.
Her tits are big. Her ass is bad. Her hips are square. Her legs are stumpy. Her shoulders are awkward. She has no phsyique, has done no training on gym to upkeep her body. Is/was skinnyfat and now just turning fat. All fat goes to her hips first. She has bad genetics. Her body has only 1 good part and the rest is average at best.
She would be a 6, but she's legitimately 2 points below average woman in the face.
That FORCES her to be a 4.. or 4.5 tops. because the rest of her body outside of her tits is actually not that decent.
She's 1 tier BELOW average.
The average woman is plain faced but not UGLY. she's UGLY. you can't be average unless you have both an average face AND body. She would need to have a fantastic physique to compensate for that face. i'm sorry. I can't do better than a 4.5 for her. I'll give her nothing more!
>>512074853Keep trying to be a psychologist i'm sure it'll work one day. I'm going back to talking about chicks like a normal dude