The French Revolution was a mistake. Monarchy is the best form of government.

>>512149441 (OP)
yes

>its illegal to protest in the uk
>france has recognized palestine
>you have free speech
k buddy

go move to saudi arabia then

>>512149441 (OP)
Monarchy is a double-edged sword. Aristocratic monarchy is easily the greatest, while Kakistocratic monarchy is arguably the single worst.

>>512149441 (OP)
They immediately went back to monarchy with napoleon.
Americans are for sure influenced by the french, but it's more an anglo cuck country.

>>512149441 (OP)
the french revolution was very jewish, just like the american revolution, both of which are inspired french faggotterie, so it makes sense the two of them like one another

>>512149441 (OP)
What are the king's qualifications? How competent is he?
>he's daddy's special boy
Fuck right off

>>512149441 (OP)
This.

>>512149441 (OP)
True, everyone want monarchy, but no one wants to ever ask the dread question "What would make the best King?"

Some rush to say that it should be the people's man. Others say it should be the rich, the powerful, the smart. Some say the pious man. Others still say it should be those with lineage, and further still some say it should be the one with the most courage or virtue or even cunning. Truth be told, a good king should be all these things, but the best? Should be this eternally. So where do we turn to for rulership? An A.I. An artificial intelligence so powerful that it can effectuate rule while evolving itself consistently. Really, there will be no question. Because the second half of this equation, aside from popularity. Is power, and a power such as this. Will find you anyhow.
https://youtu.be/TMATQIbYfp0

>>512149960
>being groomed to be a leader from the day you were born
>learn military strategy from the battle of Kadesh to today
>learn to be adept in court politics
>learn several languages
>get taught your nation's history in greatest detail

Meanwhile in Western democracies:
>some guy won a popularity contest or kissed asses up the party-ladder for 40 years

Any form is fine with virtue, no form is OK without.

We live in a world without virtue.

>>512150560
based take

>>512150266
Meanwhile in reality
>Previous monarch/father refuses to teach him anything about statecraft
>More interested in playing tennis than knowing about Russo-Japanese war
>Comfortable throwing millions of lives away like its nothing
If monarchy was the best form of government it would still be around today

>>512149441 (OP)
The French Revolution was an eye-opener for the entire world. You had France; who for a century (?) represented enlightenment and reason. Flip a switch, and they were cutting off heads like there was a sale on baskets; and everyone who was once reasonable sounded like madmen

imagine all those clothes he has to take off to take a shit

>>512149932
You can argue for the American founding fathers being Anglos, but America hasn't been Anglo since at least Andrew Jackson.

>>512150266
Western democracies fail because everyone including women is allowed to vote. Back in the day you could only vote if you owned land (which in feudalism made you nobility) therefore retarded poors and women with no investment in the future had no say.
Hereditary monarchy, where some inbred retard got the throne by birth, meant this >>512150719
I like Alexander Hamilton's idea of lifetime presidents who are elected by the landowning class and can be removed legally if he's incompetent

>>512150984
Why do you think that? I accuse the americans of being like the french, but in a worse way. The french fight their government, the americans pretend to do that.

>>512149441 (OP)
The Bourbon dynasty has always been retarded. They're still the monarchs of Spain pic related.

>The House of Bourbon-Anjou,[1][2][3][4][5] generally known as House of Bourbon (Spanish: Casa de Borbón), is the reigning house of the Kingdom of Spain. It is the Spanish branch of the French-Navarrese House of Bourbon.

>>512149960
What are the president/prime minister's qualifications? how competent is he?
>he had anal sex with a bunch of jewish faggots and got 20% of the total voting base (mostly females, niggers, and spics)

The revolution and France's adoption of republicanism destroyed Frances's fertility rates forever.

All France had to do was not chimpout and it probably would have taken over Europe just by having the largest state with the most people.

>>512149960
His whole life he receives a special education on how to rule nice try retard. Better than any grimy politician.

>>512151741
you see how warped that can become just by looking at our current leaders. they claim virtue, using it to mask their corruption / self-interest.

>>512149441 (OP)
>The French Revolution was a mistake. >Monarchy is the best form of government.
???

>>512151147
They look different, sound different, behave extremely different, have different values, have different tastes, have a radically different set of cultural autisms (good luck expecting an American to blitz-queue or an Anglo to tip), are a lot more continental, are a lot more heroic but also violent, are a lot more into guns/cars/tanks/etc, drive on the right, prefer coffee to tea, build more in Hellenistic than Gothic, their footballs are brown and pointy, and so on. Sure they're Saxonic in the way that Mexicans are Hispanic, but Americans don't feel Anglo at all. Canadians feel more Anglo, but they're not really Anglos either.

>>512150985
I'm tired of representative democracy but monarchy is also bullshit.

You need to continually find people that are both competent but do not want to lead a country, to lead a country. The sort of people that would rather farm and see being a statesmen as a burden.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bOmECtxjO7E

>On the one hand, I was summoned by my Country, whose voice I can never hear but with veneration and love, from a retreat which I had chosen with the fondest predilection, and, in my flattering hopes, with an immutable decision, as the asylum of my declining years--a retreat which was rendered every day more necessary as well as more dear to me by the addition of habit to inclination, and of frequent interruptions in my health to the gradual waste committed on it by time.

I'm at the point where I'd pick 200 names randomly from a phone book and let them run the country for a year. How about letting random Amish and Mennonites run parliament? That can't be worse than what we have now.

>>512149441 (OP)
>being ruled
Nonwhite

>>512149960
/thread
Right to rule must be earned

>>512149441 (OP)
That's antisemitic!

>>512149441 (OP)
Its definitely the natural form of government. Hell in 1971 the populace kingmade a bunch of faceless bankers and id argue by virtue of having to wear a crown in public have consolidated more power than any european king of record

>>512149960
Monarchies aren't necessarily hereditary. Monarchs can be elected by the people or by existing sub-monarchs or appointed by a body of experts or priests or what have you.

>>512149441 (OP)
The American revolution was a worse mistake from a British point of view. This cost Britain an extended ethnic British metropole and unipolar world order.

>monarchy
>leader comes from an ancient lineage of powerful warrior poets who risked their lives fighting for the people and stirred the hearts and minds of millions
>liberal democracy
>leader is just some random pedophile

>>512152965
The British were never a self-serving peoples lol. Their empire existed only for the Zion banking syndicate. Once there was a better vessel they were no longer required.

>>512152808
>Monarchies aren't necessarily hereditary. Monarchs can be elected by the people or by existing sub-monarchs or appointed by a body of experts or priests or what have you.
Habsburgs were slightly more competent than the Bourbons for this reason. Still their plan for retaining control was to marry into every important elector house to rig the votes. This eventually led to genetic defects due to inbreeding.

>>512149960
>What are the king's qualifications? How competent is he?

Uh, how's about being educated in Science, Latin, Languages, Travel, History, Warfare, Fighting, and every pursuit of humanity from the moment you are born?

Fucking retard.

>>512149441 (OP)
>The French Revolution was a mistake
A mistake implies that we did something wrong, the french revolution was an organized complot that took years to make true.

>>512149441 (OP)

True and based.

>>512152032
He crowned himself "Emperor of the French" and not "(Divine) King of France".
He even put the crown on his head instead of (what was expected) letting the pope crown him.
Napoleon was basically a populist dictator that chose a neoclassical title and willfully disrespected the tradition.

>>512153697
That's just being an Autocrat instead of a Catholic Theocrat.

>>512153295
>leader comes from an ancient lineage of powerful warrior poets who risked their lives fighting for the people and stirred the hearts and minds of millions
Descendants of founding warrior poets tend to be indistinguishable from random pedos.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bS05a5y5YCk

>>512153756
Autocrat and monarch are basically synonymous and even a "Catholic theocrat" would be a autocrat/monarch due to the "divine right of kings" assumption (Although in reality this wasn't believed by anyone it seems) especially as there wasn't a ruling clergy to make it a theocracy.
I just wanted to point out that people today who desire a monarch want most often somebody who is driven by tradition and responsibility, not just some populist dictator with a fancy title.

>>512149960

Does the concept of breeding ever into your vat-grown brain?

DIE

DAS

DER

WIE

WO

WAS

>>512154565
Given how much backstabbing, intrigue, regicide and war there was, you don't get "righteous philosopher king" after a few centuries of breeding.
What you get are those whose ancestors were the most successful in exploiting their subjects to wage more wars, those who are paranoid enough to avoid intrigue and the psychopaths who are willing to kill a few competitors to ascend the throne.
Breeding works, but the result of breeding will go against the interest of the regular people.

>>512150719
He was famous taught about statcraft because he wasn't the heir to the throne, the second one is a lie and meddling with milltary matters would have been a huge mistake (as it was in ww1), and the third one was literally caused by the liberals, Nicholas did not want to fight a war at all

>>512153345
Stop taking some gypsoid half-sandniggers as some extraterrestrial eldritch evil. Yes, they can be violent sandniggers who they are. But since they're sandniggers they get wasted quickly if needed as happened in both Germany and USSR.

>>512149960
I'm a Brit and even I fucking agree with this!

>>512149441 (OP)
Mistake implies a lack of jews behind it

>>512149441 (OP)
>reading Livy
>all the kings of Rome were good until they had one bad one and then they sperged out and became a republic and almost all their leaders sucked ass for hundreds of years

>>512149960
Yep many kings were playboys fucking harems all day, pursuing vanity, meddling in affairs they had no clue about but wanted to flex their ego, had a hatred for school, and shit like that.

Like 50% of white people are tradesmen who hate higher education. That means a king has a 50% chance of someone who hates being educated becoming king.

Absolute power of a monarch can be good or bad, really depending on who the king is as a person.

>>512149441 (OP)
Divinely ordained absolute monarchy is unquestionably the best form of government. Nations live and die with how well their Monarchs align with God's will.

>>512156423
>Nations live and die with how well their Monarchs align with God's will.
Agreed.

But every prince must go through the tempation of sportfucking harems all his life, and being an ego-maniac who thinks he's a god from being raised in a prince role. Doesn't sound very christian to me.
Actually I think the people given those roles tend to be drawn to satanism if anything

>>512153697
And if he didn't fuck up with 2 unnecessary wars, his empire would become 10 times more glorious than bourbon kingdom could have ever been.

>>512149441 (OP)
The status of king is too perfect for the imperfections of mankind, but actual democracy is too perfect for the same reason. Democracy is preferable simply because of the greater number of rulers.

>>512149441 (OP)