>>5121549392/2
Hotels are drawing heat now because the government has upped their use massively (despite promising the opposite before the election). Iirc the government can force local councils to accept them. The hotels get paid (taxpayer's) money for the migrants - it's guaranteed money long term so they're happy to take it.
The migrants are often busses in in their hundreds all at once, without warning, and suddenly a quiet sleepy town that hasn't changed substantially for 500 years is infested with foreign subhumans overnight (literally, they smuggle them in at night).
I mentioned Serco, well Serco is one of those megacorps that has fat fingers in every pie. It's a British state-owned enterprise, or perhaps the government is an enterprise-owned state? Hard to tell.
Serco offers any landlord in Britain the following deal: if you house migrants in your property we will guarantee your rental payments for the next n years. That money comes straight out of the taxpayer's purse, by virtue that Serco is given the contract & charter to do this by the government. Which is why it's so hard to get a flat in Britain now - they're all infested with migrants, paid for by bribe to the landlord from the public coffers.
So here's the state of things
1) the royal navy refuses to secure the waters around the islands against foreign invaders (google "marine jihad" btw)
2) the army refuses to secure the shores
3) the state refuses to deport because of its own asylum rules
4) the state refuses to change its own asylum rules (despite "parliamentary sovereignty")
5) the state raises the British people's taxes (overwhelmingly paid by natives, whom I shall refer to simply as British)
6) the state pays its tame megacorp(s) with British money to accommodate these migrants
7) the state+ (Serco et al) house migrants in British hotels / British houses / British towns / British villages
8) the state's henchmen (police and mi5) persecute British natives who express any hostility to the above