We have to give up on the "Aryan Race" worship. Europeans are genetically European, descended from peoples who came to Europe tens of thousands of years ago. The Aryans are later migrants from Central Asia who contributed a bit of DNA to Europeans but mostly contributed their languages.
There is no Aryan Race in Europe. It's the European race with some later admixtures.
The idea that nearly all Europeans are descended from Central Asian raiders who arrived 4000 years ago and exterminated and replaced the native people is just false and leads race studiers down rabbit holes.

>>512159646 (OP)
yeah, some europeans like sardinians are almost 0% "aryan"

>>512159646 (OP)
Carrying titles of pride from the past will do no good for anyone in the future, (you) are what (you) are and you don't need to pretend to be anything else

or you could just not be retarded

>>512159875
This guy has no merits or anything worth being praised for. It's why he has to stick to some 1000 year old "tradition". He doesn't want to adapt, he wants life to be easy and to cater to him

>>512159646 (OP)
Shut up you bronze age farmer faggot. Yamnayas are the real whites.

>>512159646 (OP)
Correct except for central asia. Aryans came from caspia and pontia or from Anatolia. Only reason the Aryan theory was invented was because the english couldn't understand how indians could be descendants of the people mentioned in the vedas. There was a desire to connect europeans to the early ancient civilizations of the world. However m, after the discovery of Gobekkli Teppe there isnt any point in trying to solve the puzzle of who built what 3 thousand years ago, when there could be hundreds of other sites from 12000 years ago pre-dating the aryans.

>>512159942
>he wants life to be easy and to cater to him
That sounds like everyone who isn't bored with peace, I can't fault it

>>512160777
Oh, the "pathetic native European farmer enriched by the mighty Aryan chad warriors" hypothesis?
Is there even any solid evidence that there is a genetically distinct warrior population in Europe, separate from the rest of the European population, that descends almost exclusively from the Aryan invaders a few thousand years ago? I ask because that's the claim your theory rests on.

>>512161528
>Correct except for central asia. Aryans came from caspia and pontia or from Anatolia. Only reason the Aryan theory was invented was because the english couldn't understand how indians could be descendants of the people mentioned in the vedas. There was a desire to connect europeans to the early ancient civilizations of the world. However m, after the discovery of Gobekkli Teppe there isnt any point in trying to solve the puzzle of who built what 3 thousand years ago, when there could be hundreds of other sites from 12000 years ago pre-dating the aryans.
Yeah, and I don't even see why it's so important to maintain that Europeans sowed the seed of every civilization in the world. It's already obvious that modern Europeans have created a civilization (Western Civilization) that greatly eclipses any past civilization in its achievements. That should be good enough to have a sense of pride.

>>512159646 (OP)
selective breeding can make everyone superhuman.

>>512162044
You're a lying whining faggot, just like your dirt farming ancestors.

>>512162044
all this yap you sound like a redditor you're probably old or something don't you have a wife and kids? go home to your family man bahahahah

>>512163862
>>512165185
No good evidence, huh?

>>512159646 (OP)
NORTH INDIAN IS ARYAN SAAR YOU ARE TEH BLOODY!!!!

>>512165564
>duuuurrrf
Nigger. Go eat a turnip.

>>512159646 (OP)
Those central Asian raiders had common ancestry with the Neolithic farmers, and a further common ancestry with the WHG. Who are the people most native to Europe. Their differences are caused by some admixture and environmental pressures. The "Aryan" culture of the invaders was more eugenic, but the farmers were actually becoming like them before they even arrived. They just had to run out of easy land, first.

>>512167119
Isn’t this because of the Dzudzuana ancestry which they call basal Eurasian

>>512162213
They’re retarded subhuman white trash who don’t know what they’re talking about.

They know nothing of Mesopotamian, Indus Valley, Norte Chico, Ancient Egyptian, etc genetics

>>512167273
Yeah, it's around the time of the basal Eurasians. But specifically the northern ones in Ukraine which became WHG. The southern ones mostly mixed into the Anatolian farmers which is why they were pretty swarthy despite initially being the palest.
We're all 10,000 years apart from just having 3 or 4 father's, and 26,000 years apart from being the same. Our differences come from environmental pressures and founders bias', exacerbated by our complex civilizations.
Late indos and ANF are a bit Asian though, and those basal europeans that ANF slightly mixed with were practically like nafris before arabization
So I could understand nordicism or "aryanism"

>>512159646 (OP)
Our Aryan heritage is important because it is the basis of our shared culture, without the legacy left to us by the Aryans there is nothing to unite Europe into a whole. The farmers and hunters are forgotten defeated races that cannot constitute a shared cultural and civilizational basis for Europe.

>>512159646 (OP)
t.

>>512162044
>Is there even any solid evidence that there is a genetically distinct warrior population in Europe, separate from the rest of the European population, that descends almost exclusively from the Aryan invaders a few thousand years ago?
The vast majority of our y-dna is R1a and R1b, we are directly descended from these warriors.

>>512166646
So you really believe Europeans and Indians are essentially the same race?

>>512172017
You such a commie leftist conniving rat faggot.

>>512167119
>Those central Asian raiders had common ancestry with the Neolithic farmers, and a further common ancestry with the WHG. Who are the people most native to Europe. Their differences are caused by some admixture and environmental pressures. The "Aryan" culture of the invaders was more eugenic, but the farmers were actually becoming like them before they even arrived. They just had to run out of easy land, first.
I guess that's possible, but it seems very speculative. We need hard DNA evidence that can break down the exact characteristics of every little group in Europe and across Asia to Central Asia before we can really know how much later invaders bred with native Europeans who evolved in Europe itself. As it stands, I don't think genetic science has the data, or possibly even the necessary techniques, to fully put this picture together.
But it does make sense that Europeans are a race evolved in Europe over tens of thousands of years that later mixed with occasional invaders coming from Asia.
The most plausible explanation of European ancestry is that Europeans are mostly just descendants of those people who evolved in Europe tens of thousands of years ago.

>>512169901
>Our Aryan heritage is important because it is the basis of our shared culture, without the legacy left to us by the Aryans there is nothing to unite Europe into a whole. The farmers and hunters are forgotten defeated races that cannot constitute a shared cultural and civilizational basis for Europe.
How are the farmers and hunters "forgotten and defeated" if modern Europeans are products of their DNA much more so than the DNA of later invading groups?
Their culture might have been defeated, and their languages forgotten, but genetically we are those same people almost entirely. So, racially, we are those farmers and hunters, and their DNA is presumably what makes Europeans great, not the little bit of DNA gained from groups like the Aryans who came just 4000 years ago and didn't affect the racial makeup of Europeans very deeply.

>>512170169
>The vast majority of our y-dna is R1a and R1b, we are directly descended from these warriors.
But where do you get the claim that the people who evolved in Europe were not warriors or had no warrior talents until the Aryans came along?
And if the Aryans are the reason for European superiority (and I do believe Europeans are superior due to a combination of high intelligence and creativity), then why didn't northern and western Europeans become relevant and highly successful until after about the year 1500?

>>512172230
>You such a commie leftist conniving rat faggot.
The Aryan Theory says Indians and Europeans are the same race, fundamentally, just the Aryans mixed with some native peoples in India and exterminated the native Europeans so that the peoples living in Europe since antiquity are mainly descendants of steppe Asians.

>>512172407
>didn't affect the racial makeup of Europeans very deeply.
They slaughtered every single male in europe so they are the sole ancestors of all white men today. You are a whore who wants to minimize their impact as a way to minimize the impact of men in general on everything. Eat shit and kill yourself you cunt

>>512168754
But Is basal Eurasian the same as Dzudzuana?

>>512169901
I dont think the farmers should be discounted on genetics alone. They just fell into a behavior sink. The Etruscans were pretty respectable and formidable once conditions demanded it.
Its just that anf are stuck acting like slaves, and yamnayas were stuck acting like enslavers. We really wouldn't be the same without one or the other. Still, total aryan victory.
>>512172236
Those invaders were descended from the natives. Many still had their blue eyes when they returned.

>>512172612
Conniving obfuscating retard whore. The warriors came and enslaved your mothers and fucked their warrior seed into them to create the white race we are today.

>>512159646 (OP)
See how they try and erase our heritage?

Just because they were in Asia, doesn't mean they were shitskins. Magic soil isn't real.

>>512172921
There's west ones and north ones. They're the east ones. They mostly died out from some rat plague or mixed into ANF. I think.

>>512173197
So is that a yes?

>>512159646 (OP)
Just shut up and keep Jewmaxxing as usual so you don't get torn by scandals.

>>512159646 (OP)
>We have to give up on the "Aryan Race" worship.
you mean pajeets? yeah you really should. you ruined it for the white supremacists. you made it lame and retarded. it's forever tainted by a billion pajeets rubbing their stink on it in yet another futile bid to jam their foot in the cultural door of the west.
face the fucking music dudes: the only reason anybody heard of aryans at all is because the deutschy german people made it fashionable and then notorious. pajeets never had a god damn thing to do with anybody giving a fuck.
so yeah, pajeets, fucken drop it.
stop trying

>>512173246
Yes.

>>512172941
Actually I redacted that. Eteuscans were just copying indos honestly

>>512159646 (OP)

I like elephants and God likes elephants.