>defeats the white race

How do racists cope?

if China was winning, the spam would be unnecessary

>>512188203 (OP)
I cope by thoroughly sucking my wife's bvll's B_B_C to prepare it for her pvssy

Economy
>Growth is stuck around 4~5%, compared to the 7–8% days of the past.
(2024: IMF: 4.8%/OECD: 4.7%/World bank: about 4.5%)

2. Birth rate
>TFR is below 1.0 (around 0.8–0.9), one of the lowest in the world.
>Population started shrinking in 2022, and young people want nothing to do with marriage or kids.

3. Aging
>65+ already make up over 15% of the population; by 2035 it’ll be close to 30%.
>CCP has started raising the retirement age and tweaking pensions to cover the shortfall, sparking public backlash.

4. Real estate
>Giants like Evergrande and Country Garden have defaulted, unsold housing stock is piling up.
>Falling home prices and broke local governments are feeding a vicious cycle.

5. Debt
>IMF puts general government debt at ~88% of GDP in 2024; CEIC’s 25% is central government only.
>China’s total non-financial debt is nearly 290% of GDP, thanks to bloated SOEs and off-the-books local government debt.
>Companies, households, and the state are all maxed out, leaving no room for stimulus.

>>512188203 (OP)
Bro Chinese people literally hop the border just to come live in the US. Cope harder, YOUR chink family literally lives here instead of in China.

>>512188203 (OP)
Westerners can never

https://youtu.be/1mh9TnfDXhg?si=Caf-rH5k9tC1pRyT

>>512189017
>Growth is stuck around 4~5%, compared to the 7–8% days of the past.

This is literally a cope as growth in Western countries has been stuck at sub-2% for over a decade.

>TFR is below 1.0 (around 0.8–0.9), one of the lowest in the world.
>Population started shrinking in 2022, and young people want nothing to do with marriage or kids.

Same in the West, except no economic growth.

>Giants like Evergrande and Country Garden have defaulted, unsold housing stock is piling up.
>Falling home prices and broke local governments are feeding a vicious cycle.

A housing glut is not a problem for anyone except real estate investors. China has one of the highest homeownership rates in the developed world, higher than the U.S. or any Western European country.

>IMF puts general government debt at ~88% of GDP in 2024; CEIC’s 25% is central government only.

So financially stable when many Western countries are over 100% of debt-to-GDP including the USA.

>Companies, households, and the state are all maxed out, leaving no room for stimulus.

Debt stimulus destroys the economy and enriches only a handful. That this ideology has gained credence in the West is proof of its terminal decline. China believes in the real economy which is growing at twice the pace of the West. At 4-5% growth, China's "recession" would be considered literally boom economic growth in any Western country.

>>512189264
1. True 4~5% looks strong on paper. But if you go from 8% > 4% while relying on debt and unproductive investment, it's not growth it's managed stagnation.
The West may grow slower, but with higher productivity and without building ghost cities.

2. The West has low birthrates but can rely on immigration, cultural pluralism, and political liberalism to adapt.
China has no such demographic parachute. Its social contract was built on youth abundance, now it's crumbling with no replacement.

3. It's not just a real estate investor issue. China's local governments rely on land sales, banks are exposed to housing backed loans, and household wealth is over 70% tied to property.
A glut here isn't just oversupply. it's systemic.

4. That 88% number ignores local government financing vehicles (LGFVs), which are off book.
China's "low" debt is a trick of accounting, not actual financial resilience. The U.S. has transparent liabilities; China has hidden traps.

5. China's "real economy" investment often means bridges to nowhere and ghost cities.
If stimulus goes to SOEs and unprofitable infrastructure, it's still destructive just slower and more opaque than Western QE.


int short, You're not wrong that the West is decaying. But pretending China's trajectory is better just because it's slower to collapse is delusional

>>512189608
>8% to 4% while relying on debt and unproductive investment

Again, the debt situation is not nearly bad as the West and the investment is clearly productive if it's causing GDP to rise.

>The West has low birthrates but can rely on immigration, cultural pluralism, and political liberalism to adapt.

So you're ready to admit that the West is cooking the books on birth rates and most of its already negative growth trajectory comes from brown subhumans with no national allegiance migrating and reproducing?

>stimulus goes to SOEs and unprofitable infrastructure

Again, growth is rising at rates considered breakneck in Western countries even within a recessionary environment.

>pretending China's trajectory is better just because it's slower to collapse is delusional

China will find a way to fix the population issue and recover. That's the main thing. Outside of that China is doing phenomenal and far better than the West in every metric including that of youth loyalty and social contract. Most Westerners would not even fight for their countries.

>>512188203 (OP)
>Don't be chinese
>win
It's just that easy.

You wumaos only embarrass china.

>>512189778
1. This ignores that China's reported debt figures often exclude hidden local government and corporate debts, making the real debt burden much higher than official numbers suggest. GDP growth fueled by massive debt and inefficient infrastructure projects is unsustainable and masks deep structural economic problems.

2. This racist and xenophobic claim is baseless and inflammatory. Western countries face demographic challenges but actively manage them with immigration, integration policies, and social support systems. Population changes do not equate to national decline and dismissing entire groups as " muh subhumans" only reveals bigotry, not truth.

3. China's 4~5% growth is declining compared to its previous decades and largely driven by credit expansion rather than productivity. Meanwhile, Western economies's lower growth reflects more sustainable, innovation-driven progress rather than bubble-driven expansion.

4. China's demographic crisis is unprecedented and cannot be solved quickly by policy changes alone. Youth "loyalty" is more a product of state propaganda than genuine societal strength. (+Comparing social contract quality without acknowledging China's censorship, social unrest, and human rights abuses paints a misleading picture)

>>512188203 (OP)
literaly did everything to outcompete manufacturing and exploit capitalist greed

>>512190262
1. You're using ChatGPT
2. You're a tourist from Reddit
3. You're a nigger
4. Your automated replies are not even addressing my points in a substantial way

Thanks for bumping my thread, retard.

>>512190882
>1. You're using ChatGPT
>2. You're a tourist from Reddit
>3. You're a nigger
>4. Your automated replies are not even addressing my points in a substantial way

all wrong

>>512188203 (OP)
The chinese are racist that's why they're winning.

Jews too, judaism is the most racist ideology ever invented, and they are also winning.

Anti-racist white countries are losing and wont exist in 30 years.