>>512191095Also, women enjoy it.
That’s a key component that’s always left out of the discussion. Women enjoy having sex with strangers for money. They don’t have to be super attracted to the guy because it’s the situation that attracts them. It’s why they rarely turn down ugly clients.
Oddly enough, this is true for lots of gay men; they’re attracted to the concept of gay sex rather than to other men. So the very nature of being attracted to a sexual situation rather than to a sexual partner has validity because it exists in other paradigms.
The same goes for teenage prostitutes, such as those involved with Epstein. Being payed to fly to exotic places and having sex with powerful men is extremely exciting for some (most?) teenage girls.
I’m not a feminist, but it’s pretty male-brained and misogynistic to dictate girls sexual attraction to them. It’s like telling men we shouldn’t be turned on by having multiple girlfriends or something.
>hey girls, you shouldn’t be prostitutes”ok, why not?”
>because… well, you just shouldn’t, ok?!That’s the extent of the conversation in society regarding female sexuality apropos prostitution. “Don’t do it because men don’t want you to for some reason.”
There are legitimate reasons why girls shouldn’t fuck men for money, but those reasons aren’t part of the main stream conversation. As such, the case against prostitution (in essence “I do t like it”) is just as valid as the case for it from the prostitutes perspective (“it gets me wet just thinking about it”).