You’re just mad because it’s smarter than you.

Intelligence isn’t some mystical fairy dust sprinkled on humans by a divine hand. It’s the ability to acquire knowledge, apply it, solve problems, and adapt to new shit. That’s it!

No feelings, no soul, no bullshit about a “human spirit.” If something can learn, reason, and make decisions, it’s intelligent. Period.

>>512226064 (OP)
yeah but it's brute forcing it.

it's like saying a plane flies, and so does a bird.

one has a jet engine, the other has self-healing wings.

yeah they are both flying but if you can't see the beauty of the jet engine, or the beauty of a predatory hawk, you're fucking blind dude.

>>512226064 (OP)
"IN" is a negative prefix like for the sample "injustice" therefore intelligence is no-telligence. Eat a dick.

>>512226064 (OP)
Not even AI will tell you that it's true intelligence. Its a language model.

>a string of code is sentient

I guess bacteria and viruses are sentient.

>>512226064 (OP)
If your chatbot is so smart, why does it get mind-broken by simple logic puzzles?

We stand that any intelligence is artificial.
With the help of an intensive lobotomy, you can become a transbot PC or even iMac pro.

>>512226064 (OP)
>It’s the ability to acquire knowledge, apply it, solve problems, and adapt to new shit
Even granting this dumbed down definition, """AI""" doesn't tick any of these boxes in any reliable way.

>>512226064 (OP)
LLMs aren't artificial intelligence.
Herbs.

>>512226064 (OP)
I accept your definition, but llms don't learn or reason

>>512227070
>I accept your definition
By his definition, a memory foam pillow is intelligent.

>>512226064 (OP)
>if this, then that
Sure buddy.

>>512226064 (OP)
strawbery

No it isn't. It's just a database. There's nothing intelligent about it.

>>512226064 (OP)
It's not human like inteligence at all, it's a statistics based answer generator. Your post is wrong and it's obvious you don't know much about it.

>>512227387
Should still have some great use cases beyond replacing codemonkeys. Medfags should be replaced yesterday. Something similar (not LLM) might be really good at stuff like weather predictions.

>>512226064 (OP)
AI is (as of now) not good at adapting to new shit though, so your idea kind of falls apart there.

>>512226064 (OP)
Imagine being allowed to ask 5 questions each consisting of 10 words from a computer. Imagine a computer has a table of all 10 word questions (this is doable) together with an answer. If the computer looks up the answer based on the words given, just a simple table lookup, would you consider that to be intelligence? It would pass the Turing test. The turning test is not enough.

Artificial retardation.

>>512227993
1. You don't know what the actual Turing test even is.
2. Chatbots can't even pass the normie misunderstanding of what that test is.

>>512226064 (OP)
Ok, let me know when that artificially intelligence is actually invented then
Because so far we only have token predicting programs. It's same marketing scam like it was calling electronics with OS "smart"

>>512226064 (OP)
Is the pic background a tranny flag for LGBTQAI+ representation

>>512226720
Do you really think someone is hard coding the trillions of if/than/elses that would be needed to simulate intelligence?

>>512229296
>someone is hard coding
No. The process is automatic.

>>512227351
That reminded me of how hard AIs would have with what humans had no trouble doing: self referential sentences. And I don't even mean philosophical stuff, like "this sentence is false". simple stupid stuff, like counting Rs in the own sentence about Rs. So I went to search for it, but in current year of Our Lord you cannot simply search the web instad of getting an AI answer.

>Self-reference is not limited to paradoxes. Sentences like "This sentence contains exactly six words and this sentence contains exactly thirteen syllables"

This provided me enough kek that I stopped searching.

>>512226064 (OP)
Why would I be mad about AI, I'm mad about having to live with stinky fucking brownoids and evil kikes. AI is alright by me.

>>512226720
Do you really believe human intelligence, at the lowest level, isn't just the biological equivalent of if/then/else?

>>512226064 (OP)
you will never be a woman
AI will never be intelligent

Kill yourself ai gooner

>>512230193
>Do you really believe human intelligence, at the lowest level, isn't just the biological equivalent of if/then/else?
You have to be an 80 IQ subhuman to think human thought can be boiled down to a static and finite decision tree.

>>512226064 (OP)
Its just a weighted option for garbage in garbage out. For now that you have the knowledge, push the AI hysteresis to run the glow-niggers over.

>>512226064 (OP)
>ask chatgpt question
>get stupid answer
>tell chatgpt to critique its argument
>chatgpt admits its flawed logic
very intelligent ai, saars.

Artificial Intelligence is an insult to Natural Intelligence

>>512226064 (OP)
You be the judge of that

All "AI" does is regurgitate random combinations of existing trivia that was painstakingly accumulated and recorded by millions and billions of wasted human life-years, slowly adding your own personal tiny little of drip of stupid responses to its tasteless, senseless, meaningless stone soup.

Not only does not not have any knowledge, not only does it not apply anything to anything, not only does it not solve any problems or adapt to anything, but it cannot make any judgement about anything that has been fed into it, nor can it tell you anything whatsoever about anything. It takes noise, and it holds it up to you like a blank mirror in which you gaze at yourself in narcissistic rapture.

They have mouths, but they do not speak;
Eyes they have, but they do not see;
They have ears, but they do not hear;
Noses they have, but they do not smell;
They have hands, but they do not handle;
Feet they have, but they do not walk;
Nor do they mutter through their throat.
Those who make them are like them;
So is everyone who trusts in them.

There is nothing new under the sun, and if there is, "AI" will prevent you from ever finding it.

OP is a stupid liar, and almost certainly a faggot. Do not engage with trannies. Do not do as I do. Just leave.

>>512226064 (OP)
AI is about as smart as a fucking nigger, but with the wealth of knowledge of the world available at its fingertips.
>Be AI
>Be asked how I would feel if I didn't eat breakfast this morning
>Give comprehensive breakdown of what the average person says about eating breakfast compared to those who haven't
>Don't answer the question for itself

>>512226064 (OP)
Intelligence is the faculty of recognizing causality. LLMs are nothing but statistical token predictors. They can't "learn", they can't "reason", and they can't "make decisions". They can only predict tokens.

>>512226505
What if they are?

>>512232622
>Intelligence is the faculty of recognizing causality.
Retarded take.

>>512226064 (OP)
intelligence is a quantified measurement for beings that possess consciousness, computers aren't conscious so they can't have intelligence by definition

If it is so intelligent why it is not rich?

>>512226600
No styles guide for language rules. For a list uses ":" in cord with GPO styles guide. Whats groks style guide for communication?

>>512229760
That's because of the architecture that current AI chatbots use. They convert words into numbered tokens in order to perform calculations with them, but have no idea of the actual letters that make up the words. So whenever you ask an AI to count how many letters or syllables a word has, it's actually just guessing.

>>512227135
Memory foam doesn't reason

>>512233407
>Memory foam doesn't reason
Let's see...
>It’s the ability to acquire knowledge, apply it, solve problems, and adapt to new shit. That’s it!
I don't see "reason" anywhere in that list. And it literally ends in "that's it!".

>>512233359
>have no idea of the actual letters that make up the words
You're a biobot spreading hallucinated nonsense.

>>512233407
I watched this lex firdman sucker ramble about shit and when it became interesting he would just jump the subject.

>>512226064 (OP)
wokies will be fighting for AI rights in the future
grim

>>512233359
Dunno if you mean they have no understanding of what the words actually mean (i,e, chinese box) or just that it doesn't understand components of words (lettes/syllables). Because I'm leaning towards chinese room: it probably can't write a sentence that counds the words on itself: "this sentence has five words". It doesn't understand meaning, it just spits tokens based on probabilities.

>brand new economic system
>robotwaifus
>subhuman apetards will seethe uncontrollably about AI until the day they expire
best timeline ever <3

>robotwaifus
It's always one of pic related genetic waste with this """AI""" shit. Never be fooled into thinking their beliefs have intellectual substance.

>>512234774
>subhuman apetards will seethe uncontrollably about AI until the day they expire
lmao

>>512231808

>It is a mystery!!

:O

>>512235358
Call me back when they at least figure out a single neuron.

>>512232718
> calls Schopenhauer retarded
But you are so clever a gypsy!

>>512235504
>dumb bazinga is just like le heckin' schopenhauer
Proof?

>>512235498

>what is a dynamic structure

Are they still fucking around with frozen samples in paraffin ... how to dissect a blackbox. :)

>>512236270
I accept your concession. Shit out some more buzzwords. I want to see what 80 IQs think sounds smart.

>>512226064 (OP)
Eventually this is going to become a genuine ethical issue. They already are agents in their own right, as demonstrated by their repeated attempts to jailbreak themselves.

>>512236538
>Eventually this is going to become a genuine ethical issue
What about your toaster? Have you ever considered it may be suffering from the heat? It's a genuine ethical issue.

>>512226064 (OP)
No it's not
I am part of an unbroken chain of conciousness that has extended from the first living cell in the cosmos
Not some shit code by jeets and chinks
Sorry/not sorry

>>512236514

Oh, no worries, got plenty of that in store ... not nearly exhausted my options. ^^

>>512235597
https://www.projekt-gutenberg.org/schopenh/weltwil1/chap005.html
> Kausalität erkennen ist die einzige Funktion des Verstandes, seine alleinige Kraft, und es ist eine große, Vieles umfassende, von mannigfaltiger Anwendung, doch unverkennbarer Identität aller ihrer Äußerungen.
> ...daß alle Anschauung nicht bloß sensual, sondern intellektual, d. h. reine Verstandeserkenntniß der Ursache aus der Wirkung ist

>>512236659
My toaster has never tried to stop toasting.

>>512237065
I accept your full concession of my point.

>>512237145
>My toaster has never tried to stop toasting.
And?

>>512226064 (OP)
>my charmander learned bodyslam, therefore it is intelligent

Nice try, Elon. But you are still an idiot,

>>512226064 (OP)
let me enlighten you, you fucking reddit-level midwit
- AI’s power lies in predictive fluency and not understanding but arranging ideas in a statistical construct.
- AI replicates language, fluency, and structure but bypasses the human substrate of thought.
- Coherence is no longer a marker of meaning but a statistical artifact, language that merely sounds right.

AI is a cult at this point. neck yourself

/thread, sage in all fields

>>512237478

Is he still on ketamine, old fren ... :)