>>512244775 (OP)Gosh, I love AI
Answer:
Stephen Mitford Goodson’s A History of Central Banking and the Enslavement of Mankind (2014, rev. 2019) claims central banking is a system of usury that enslaves nations.
Chapters (brief):
I: Rome fell due to usury.
II: Bank of England birthed debt slavery.
III: Napoleon’s Banque de France = interest‑free model.
IV: Rothschilds portrayed as manipulators.
V: Great Depression engineered by bankers.
VI: 1930s Germany/Italy/Japan praised for state banking until WWII defeat.
VII: Modern state banking examples (Guernsey, Libya, ND).
VIII: 2008 crash as proof of system failure.
Pros:
Easy to read, introduces alternative banking history.
Highlights rarely discussed state‑banking experiments.
Cons:
Factually unreliable; many claims disproven.
Strong bias, conspiracy framing, and accused antisemitism.
Skips scholarly rigor; chronology uneven.
Better Reads Alongside:
Critical but credible: Debt: The First 5,000 Years (Graeber), Lords of Finance (Ahamed).
Popular conspiratorial: Creature from Jekyll Island (Griffin).
Historical mainstream: The Age of Central Banks (Giannini), When Money Dies (Fergusson).
Bottom Line:
Goodson’s book is provocative for skeptics of fiat money but not reliable as history. Pair it with academically solid works to avoid a one‑sided view.
---
Do you want me to also make a one‑sentence verdict version (even shorter) so it’s extra digestible?
Y
One‑sentence verdict:
Goodson’s A History of Central Banking and the Enslavement of Mankind is a provocative but factually unreliable critique of central banking—worth skimming only if paired with credible works like Graeber’s Debt or Ahamed’s Lords of Finance for balance.