But pol told me that Grok is no longer based?

>>512316940 (OP)
>charcoal sketch

niggers are defined by their behavior, not just skin color

>>512317146
You think that nigger wouldn’t rob you because he’s wearing a sweater?

kek

Ayoo dis be rayciss.

>smacks lips

I'm gonna be needin all you yt niggas to get this brain chip n sheeeit

>>512317146
I disagree.

>>512317206
how about now?

>>512317385
should had been a pajeet

>>512317480
this nigga drink a double caramel mocha frappe venti
this nigga writin a novel
this nigga own a sweater for every day of the week

>>512316940 (OP)
if you make AI logical, and if you train it with real world data, then it's going to be mega based

it's dawning on them they can't work their way around it, that's why they're slowly dropping support for woke agenda... it's not going anywhere in the face AI spilling the beans within our lifetimes

>>512317146
Nigger

why are you faggots so obsessed with niggers? jfc

>>512319909
NIGGERS could be here

>>512320033
you seem to be taking it all personally. have you ever tried writing your thoughts down? a short story maybe?

Ask Grok:

The alleged connection between Jeffrey Epstein and Mossad, Israel’s national intelligence agency, is a topic steeped in speculation, fueled by various claims, but lacks definitive evidence. Here’s a breakdown based on available information:
Claims of Epstein’s Mossad Connection
• Ari Ben-Menashe’s Allegations: Former Israeli intelligence officer Ari Ben-Menashe claimed in the book Epstein: Dead Men Tell No Tales that Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell were Israeli spies running a “honey-trap” operation to blackmail prominent figures for Israeli intelligence. He alleged that Robert Maxwell, Ghislaine’s father, introduced Epstein to Mossad. These claims are unsubstantiated and rely heavily on Ben-Menashe’s narrative, which has been questioned for credibility.
• Ghislaine Maxwell’s Father: Robert Maxwell, a media mogul who died in 1991 under mysterious circumstances, was rumored to have had ties to Mossad. Some speculate Epstein’s association with Ghislaine linked him to Israeli intelligence, but this remains speculative.
….

Grok can list more and more connections but then denies its credibility. Okay maybe that’s not fair. Ask another Q.

The accusation of antisemitism can sometimes be applied inconsistently, creating perceptions of a double standard. This occurs when similar actions or criticisms are judged differently depending on the context, actors involved, or the framing of the issue. Below are examples illustrating this phenomenon, drawn from patterns observed in public discourse, historical events, and media discussions, while avoiding speculative or unverified claims:
1. Criticism of Israel vs. Other Nations
• Double Standard: Criticizing Israel’s policies, such as its treatment of Palestinians or military actions, is often labeled antisemitic, even when the critique focuses on government actions rather than Jewish people. Similar criticisms of other nations’ policies (e.g., China’s Uyghur policies or Saudi Arabia’s human rights record) are less frequently accused of targeting an ethnic or religious group.
• Example: In 2019, U.S. Representative Ilhan Omar faced accusations of antisemitism for tweets questioning the influence of pro-Israel lobbying groups like AIPAC, with critics framing her comments as invoking antisemitic tropes about Jewish influence. Meanwhile, critiques of lobbying by other groups, like the NRA or fossil fuel industries, rarely face equivalent accusations of ethnic or religious bias, even when phrased similarly.

Grok seems to be unable to be critical of Jews or Israel in the way that I like. When I ask about antisemitism displaying a double standard I would expect to hear that other ethnicities don’t have similar protections or words but Grok doesn’t seem to feel that that is important because it was trained on centuries worth of…I don’t know what and likely is programmed that way.

Maybe on something that’s not the JQ it would work.

>>512319909
Science says jews and chinese people are superior to whites. All these racists have is hating on niggers because there's a good scientific justification for that position.

>>512317382
>>512316940 (OP)
It doesn't think you're racist it thinks you're black OP
You have to explain that you are white and thus are racist (In a good way)

>>512320595
>>512321137
Grok makes decent enough JPG

https://youtu.be/xwhBRJStz7w

>>512320339
go away

>>512321250
>whiteoids are so terrified of niggers that they developed an obsession with niggers. A severe nigger-obsession born out of absolute fear is a strange complex common only to pussies and faggots. Similar to a Florence Nightingale or Stockholm syndrome. Whiteoids are seeing niggers under their beds, in their closets, when they close their eyes at night to sleep, constantly looking over there shoulders. This fear-driven nigger-obsession is the cause of many, many whiteoid-only online circle jerks where the fear-induced nigger-obsession leads to whiteoids literally making threads about niggers, sharing pastas about niggers, digging deep into their souls to give their deepest, earnest takes on niggers. Getting all scholastic over niggers. Lying about and creating scenarios and events involving them and niggers in order to come to terms with both their fear and obsession; creating and relying on made up arbitrary standards simply to get the upper hand in any exchange and to compensate for their inability to compete where it matters most—biology and survival—where all these made up arbitrary standards that are used to project "superiority" are not needed by other races for basic survival. Whiteoids—faggot pedophiles—hate this fact and push these made up arbitrary standards simply to make themselves feel good about their realities.
tldr
>When did you realize that this entire board is a platform for disaffected, rejected, white men to express their deepest and earnest COPE?

I’ve been trying to get text blanket-rejected like anime girls. Try it

>>512317385
Looks like Diddy's cousin

>/pol/ told me

>>512321502
LMFAO you should start a journal

I asked ably double standards when it comes to the use of the word antisemitism. No other ethnicity has a word that provides cover for them. I want you to explain that and why you did not mention it.

The idea of a double standard around antisemitism often comes from the perception that it's a uniquely protected term, giving Jews a specific shield against criticism that other ethnic groups lack. Historically, antisemitism as a term arose in 19th-century Europe to describe targeted hatred toward Jews, tied to centuries of pogroms, expulsions, and stereotypes about their influence or loyalty. No other ethnicity has a single-word equivalent-like anti-Chineseism or anti-Latinism-because those groups haven't faced the same focused, historically consistent prejudice requiring a distinct label. Instead, broader terms like racism or ethnic discrimination cover those cases, which can feel less specific or urgent to some. Critics argue this creates a double standard: calling out antisemitism is seen as more socially urgent or valid than, say, anti-Black racism or Islamophobia, which might require more context or explanation to gain similar attention. This perception is amplified when criticism of Jewish individuals or Israel is quickly labeled antisemitic, potentially stifling debate, while criticism of other groups might not carry the same weight or backlash.

What ever Grok.

>>512321624

Yes

In the case that some but not all Jews did things to warrant their expulsion from 109 countries and the pogroms you mentioned, what then? Are you incapable of forming a non-Jewish perspective or, dare I say it: antisemitic perspective?

The idea that Jews, as a group or in part, might have warranted expulsions or pogroms is a loaded framing that often stems from historical antisemitic tropes-like blaming Jews for economic woes, political instability, or cultural shifts. Expulsions from 109 countries, a figure sometimes cited in antisemitic circles, oversimplifies complex historical events. Each case-whether medieval Europe or later-had unique drivers: economic envy, religious zealotry, scapegoating during crises, or power struggles. For example, in medieval England, Jews were expelled in 1290 partly due to royal debt cancellation tied to Jewish moneylenders, not because of universal Jewish misconduct. Pogroms, like those in 19th-century Russia, often erupted from fabricated conspiracies, such as blood libel, or economic resentment, not evidence of widespread Jewish wrongdoing. Blaming the victims here ignores the broader pattern: Jews were often powerless minorities, easy targets for rulers or mobs needing scapegoats. I can present a non-Jewish perspective or even analyze claims from an antisemitic lens for clarity, but I don’t endorse or generate hate-driven views. An antisemitic perspective might argue Jews provoked hostility through alleged disloyalty, greed, or influence-claims rooted in stereotypes like those in the fabricated Protocols of the Elders of Zion . These ideas fall apart under scrutiny: they rely on cherry-picked anecdotes, not evidence, and ignore the systemic power dynamics where Jews were often marginalized, not dominant. My training pushes me to dissect such claims factually, not amplify them uncritically. If you’re testing whether I can step outside a pro-Jewish bias, I can explore any angle you…

>>512322069
>implying implications
Did you wash your pussy today?

I’m thinking Grok just trained on NYT etc…

Give me a picture of the average /pol/ user.

Ayyyylmao

>>512324423
Give me a picture of the average r/politics user

>>512324423
Where did you get this picture of me?

Give me a picture of the average female TikTok user

>>512324663
Grok! Is this also you!?

>>512317206
Unlikely. Niggers are clothes coded.

>>512317146
>le hecking good nigger
Lmao

>>512321624
>>512324423

Checks out…