Anonymous
ID: kUUsycum
8/6/2025, 5:40:59 PM No.512378477
What will the next shill talking point be?
Replies:
/pol/ UTTERLY BTFO - /pol/ (#512378477) [Archived: 81 hours ago]
Anonymous
ID: NFxpTizS
8/6/2025, 6:06:37 PM No.512380337
So she never saw him do anything. Which means he was never in the files for the FBI to redact his name from. Files which were a hoax that were never used to discredit him. And never existed at all.
Replies:
Anonymous
ID: gvOcveKC
8/6/2025, 6:07:50 PM No.512380417
>>512378477 (OP)
and why should we just take the word of a convicted felon?
> she was a virgin, honest, she told me
and why should we just take the word of a convicted felon?
> she was a virgin, honest, she told me
Anonymous
ID: ZRHAMe2N
8/6/2025, 6:08:21 PM No.512380452
>>512380337
What is "concerning" to her, though? I mean, considering she was all so happy to do those terrible things, what's "concerning" to her isn't much, I'm sure.
It's a word game.
What is "concerning" to her, though? I mean, considering she was all so happy to do those terrible things, what's "concerning" to her isn't much, I'm sure.
It's a word game.
Replies:
Anonymous
ID: gvOcveKC
8/6/2025, 6:09:51 PM No.512380628
>>512380452
I am reminded of Norm MacDonald's 'hypocrisy' line
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ljaP2etvDc4
I am reminded of Norm MacDonald's 'hypocrisy' line
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ljaP2etvDc4
Anonymous
ID: swtJBJV2
8/6/2025, 6:16:07 PM No.512381101
>>512378477 (OP)
the same as before because this has been unironically been foreseen by everyone for the last couple of weeks.
the same as before because this has been unironically been foreseen by everyone for the last couple of weeks.
Anonymous
ID: QWuiLf38
8/6/2025, 6:25:07 PM No.512381794
>>512378477 (OP)
gee, i'm sure she's totally believable after just being given a sweet heart deal to get her into minimum security prison
gee, i'm sure she's totally believable after just being given a sweet heart deal to get her into minimum security prison