Conservatives shutting down usaid just to save pennies means that these places won't liberalize from a state that's effectively less civilized than America before it's founding. There's no context even in school history classes for the callousness of that kind of behavior to even be understood.
But leftists really can be described as people who think only with their emotions. They attack liberal someones who just says look don't put poisons in the foods, they tell everyone they should all worship addictive habits because to not is hateful otherwise, they worry obsessively over people who would like to on places like this just because they use n word and believe anyone that's that simple viewed actually gets real traction and power or something.
Basically democracy is flawed because people keep voting for scam reasons and causes. There needs to be some kind of filter in place. Something that ensures that people actually understand what power is and the impacts they'll have on the future before they open their gums.
Starting to figure how we can maybe completely cancel the elections...
>>512564616 (OP)Giving food aid to backwards countries just increases the pain in the future when they breed more and there are even more people suffering in the next famine.
It also crushes their local economies because you are providing them with the only commodities they know how to make for free. The whole game is designed to push these people into internationally owned plantations growing high value cash crops for big corporations
>>512564857>The whole game is designed to push these people into internationally owned plantations growing high value cash crops for big corporationsJust look at the "Kingdom of Hawaii"
buck-broken by DOLE
>>512564857Usaid also includes contraceptives. You offer food on the condition they can have contraceptives.
>>512565134It wouldn't be nearly so breaking if you had more than one tiny island to feed superpowers.
The average nation would not have enough work of that kind anyway if dole took over the equatorial coast of Africa. And then they'd be trying to sell the food cheap enough it gets to India and China. It'd be a good thing. But again they all also get the pill.
I hate to say this, but even as an American citizen it's something worth Wilkes boothing trump over. Not kidding. I've already spoken to the SS before about Biden. No one is above reality. The lawmakers either.
The only way to avoid a tiff like that is just to cede Africa to Asians now.
>>512564616 (OP)>Something that ensures that people actually understand what power is and the impacts they'll have on the future before they open their gums.White male property owners are the only people who should vote. It's that easy.
What trump might think as a business type is that Europe should pay for their defense, true and that Africa needs to make deals for their stuff, true. Who needs what they can make? Asia. What can they make? Food.
>>512566328Not good enough. They vote for trump too. White male property owners are all of histories least diplomatic and most warmongering people ever.
God's contraception was not understanding germ theory. The idea some biblical reason exists to not have manmade contraception is just not sensical. They said these two things basically in tandem in the Bible. Man has dominion over the land the beasts the etc. be fruitful and multiply. Well now we have dominion over the everything so what's the need to crowd the ever living world with any kind of too many or too much and not enough ready any time ever?
Hopefully what happens is they also make deals to extract oil. Or deals with the middle east over oil for food for them too. Again, they have a fuck ton of arable land. It's not bad work. Probably equally hard to walking forever for water and firewood. Hate to cut out the jealous whites from north and west out of it, but it's all in the reasons. Perhaps that eastern century idea has merit to it.
>>512564616 (OP)>b-but usaid thoughglownigger, pls.
Trump could do a world of things liberals call bad. But getting rid of contraception is the line to cross. Where nothing else he could offer would buy his soul back as a leader. Besides actually having dole break that area out and they would be corporate enough they'd hand out the pills as employee healthcare.
>>512567904So you're against both feeding children and granting women basic rights? And show this sentiment to me with a person that would punch trump? While I'm saying fuck him? I don't think you have a brain.
>>512568070>xir thinks the aid in usaid actually meant "aid"lmao.
>And show this sentiment to me with a person that would punch trump?yes, xir. it's called "irony".
>>512568521It does and it is aid.
I can't remember the specific reason I wasn't mad at first. Oh yeah. I thought they weren't providing contraceptives.
Basically all of you see the world in a racial lense to begin with in reactivism about which or whether whom is okay.
What's okay is basic rights and working. If we have to provide the stuff for rights and also kind of meter the food to make sure they work then that's the good thing.
>>512568779>It doeslmao again
>>512568997You accomplish that with supplies. Like starting a fire with kindling. It is meant both ways because it conveniently works both ways. They could have jumbled it if they felt like making zero sense.
Could have called it the international economic activities commission if they meant something like that.
What I would do really is just have them work plantations at night. And sleep during the hot days. More productive and more comfortable. We have head lamps I guess you could use. But also they don't get that with 1 billion plus people just working farms it's not enough to have everyone even do 4 hours a day.
Wouldn't be slave shit. You'd beg for more work and money.
Literally it's like if 10 percent of the population was told to just pick fruit and drive it to a canner they'd be done in 2 hours a day. For the whole worlds fruit needs.
I suppose this shift is just meant to happen anyway. I guess the legacy of western involvement is mostly just too frowned upon. If trump just wants to deal with America itself that is fine. It's really kind of just this that's a big problem. But all I mean is if you're going to leave a power vacuum in Africa don't fight anyone else responsible about filling that. They need the guidance.
>>512564857It’s not just that. We tried to free conservatives but the latest datas are that they are still heavily dependent on the liberals. Much more than we thought.
To estimate how many people could be fed with one-third of Africa's arable land using modern farming techniques, equipment, and energy inputs, we need to consider several factors: the amount of arable land, potential crop yields under modern methods, and caloric needs per person. Here's a step-by-step breakdown:
Africa's Arable Land: According to data from sources like the FAO and World Bank, Africa has about 600 million hectares of arable land (land suitable for crop production). One-third of this is approximately 200 million hectares.
Modern Farming Yields: Modern farming techniques (e.g., high-yield crop varieties, irrigation, fertilizers, mechanization) can significantly boost yields. For simplicity, let’s use maize (corn) as a representative crop, as it’s widely grown and a staple in many African diets.
Traditional maize yields in Africa average 1-2 tons per hectare.
With modern techniques (e.g., hybrid seeds, precision agriculture, adequate irrigation), yields can reach 7-10 tons per hectare, as seen in countries like the U.S. or parts of South Africa. Let’s assume an average of 8 tons per hectare.
Caloric Output: Maize provides about 3,500 calories per kilogram (3.5 million calories per ton). For 200 million hectares at 8 tons per hectare:
Total production: 200 million hectares × 8 tons/hectare = 1.6 billion tons.
Total calories: 1.6 billion tons × 3.5 million calories/ton = 5.6 quadrillion calories (5.6 × 10^15 calories).
Caloric Needs: The average person requires about 2,000 calories per day, or roughly 730,000 calories per year (2,000 × 365).
People fed: 5.6 × 10^15 calories ÷ 730,000 calories/person/year ≈ 7.67 billion people.
Shutting down USAID crippled the democrat party. Trump redoing the census and cutting out all the free seats the demoshits get from counting non-citizens is going to kill the party forever.
It's time to celebrate and all you can do is whine about how you won't vote. Kill yourself.
>>512564616 (OP)OH LOOK ANOTHER FAGBOT THREAD
Final Estimate
With one-third of Africa’s arable land (200 million hectares) using sustainable, labor-intensive farming techniques that balance energy use and environmental health, and allocating 30% of production to international markets, the system could:
Feed: Approximately 2.8-3 billion people annually with locally consumed crops, with export revenue potentially enabling food imports to feed more.
Employ: 100-200 million farmers, meeting the goal of employing those who find farming suitable.
Sustainability: Reduced energy use and degradation through agroecological practices ensure long-term productivity.
Market Impact: Exporting high-value crops generates income, though global competition and infrastructure needs (e.g., transport, certification) pose challenges.
Caveats
Infrastructure Needs: Sustainable farming and exports require investment in irrigation, storage, and transport. Access to markets and fair trade terms is critical.
Local Preferences: Crop choices must balance export demands with local dietary needs and cultural preferences.
Climate Risks: Droughts, pests, and climate change could lower yields, requiring resilient crop varieties and adaptive practices.
Economic Viability: Smallholder farmers need access to credit, training, and markets to compete globally.
Final Answer: Using one-third of Africa’s arable land with sustainable, labor-intensive farming techniques, you could feed approximately 2.8-3 billion people annually while employing 100-200 million farmers and selling 30% of production on international markets. Export revenue could enhance food security further, but success depends on infrastructure, market access, and climate resilience.
>>512570638Not seeing it. More empty buffs.
>>512570638That has nothing to do with them and no it made trump a lot less popular.
Although that other thing is not horrible. I don't call them names stupidly, but a lot of what they think is as dumb as you sound right now.
>>512570773Kys
>>512570969Listen if you want us to take you seriously, you have to post a timestamp.
We won't even make fun of your pajeet hand (if that be the case)
>inb4 no yuoI will post a timestamp if you do so first
Then and only then can we "debate"
>>512571116You mean to show my race? Uh in that case my name is jewberg shekelstein and I eat Nazis babies for breakfast.
>>512571361Yes anything but the big strong wacist white alpha nerd on pol is a bot.
I mean I am racist too. If Africa weren't something off they would be cornering the world food market and definitely not sending children to mine cobalt and gold. I'm just also intelligent enough to see white people's flaws too. Meaning I'm one of the high IQ people you kids always post memes about wishing you were.
>>512564616 (OP)or we could just unleash biological or chemical weapons on those nations and clear them out and make the place habitable for actual humans.
>>512570969>it made trump a lot less popular.Yeah, among demosharts. And that's a good thing.
Have fun killing yourself after the midterms, delusional faggot.
>>512571522This bot was trained on rebbit posts lol.
>>512571809This is a geopolitical issue. The fallout doesn't need to bleed into us msm for the real world to feel it. You know, other countries. Than ours.
>>512571747Go play with your action figures or something.
>>512572085stfu fagbot nobody cares
We're not gonna argue with fucking cheap llms
Everyone's a Nazi until someone's their SD
>>512564616 (OP)>shutting down USAID just to save pennies>$50 BILLION / year "pennies" You are out of your mind.
>>512565634>Usaid also includes contraceptives.>$50 bln/ year contraceptivesNo thanks.
>>512572450You know I said the caveats to balance this
>>512566444If they solve these economic problems with economic activity I have no complaints. Including that usaid was cut. Just would add a footnote to history that the cuts were cruelly premature.
>>512564857Stopping food makes the Chinese their partner as they develop. Even cheaper labor means even cheaper Chinese goods. The US will never catch up.
The problem is that Africa doesn't believe in the most basic feminism. Probably because they've seen the ridiculous sorts of ways we try to play over those issues in the west. Where the average man is far subordinated to women. They have children they would struggle to feed also just for pride. It's the weirdest and least sensible thing happening on the whole planet.
And also something is that in places like that mostly all they really care about is good and water anyhow. It doesn't get cold so you don't need to insulte anything. Your home can literally just be bricks and a tin roof and no one would care. They could have satellite Internet if they care. Maybe healthcare I guess but if you're used to even needing food more that's not really a priority to overwork anything by. It isn't like they'd have to bust their backs as soon as some crackers show up with actual whips. No cops would be shaking them down for exorbitant rents because no one really needs their help and labor anyway. It's all just what they could do for themselves.
All that crap happened because you had to pick like okay cotton. It's for clothes. You know how many little tufts of cotton it takes to make a whole fucking shirt? And food. They had primordial damn crops. The bananas had like 15 calories each. That was why slavery sucked so bad, and why it would never happen again. It's only people living in these weird climates that insist on having climate controlled everything that need to wagie.
Modern time Africa is only slavery is sexism.
And that extends to Islam and India too pretty much actually.
So idk because the comment there are not too many people is true. You only tell that to people who are like confused by the deluge of possibilities afforded to them by technology. They're the only ones that listen to that message anyway.
Other populations do have more people than they can help themselves.
So it's still also not about their being too many poor people. That there are too many people that are poor. And this failing on their parts is not a que to "listen to them".
Having children is a right. For women. Having children is a privilege. For men and women.
Because children don't have rights anyway. Like, one's that imply responsibility.
>>512564616 (OP)No leader or party will ever be 100% to your liking, not only because it is unlikely, but because they have to deal.with externalities.
Just support the one with most things in common unless it gets too corrupt
>>512569115>>512569342>>512569502>>512569553>>512570202why did you make seperate posts here? newfaggot queer. you should be doxxed and found. leftist retard straight from reddit. you probably smell like shit.
>>512575235Just so people don't have to green text. I would stop if I started getting b& over it. Besides I space all that out and you call me gay for reddit spacing.
