>>512591212It isn't a valid point because it requires either the willful misinterpretation of holy texts or genuine ignorance/idiocy.
If someone who actively studied the Bible made the argument that Christ was advocating in favor of illegal migrants it would, potentially, be a valid argument, because the person making the claim is well versed in the text and the various nuances of the text.
If a faggot liberal cherry picks a quote out of a book he has not read, I am not going to listen to him over the literal thousands of years worth of scholars poring over the Bible.
If Christ was talking about migrants, it would have been brought up well before the migrant 'crisis' and it would be trivial to find a huge body of work talking about how Christ was talking about illegal migrants spanning the last thousand years.