>>512624914>it's propaganda not scienceThe overwhelming majority of "science" that people see is glorified propaganda. A lot of scientific concepts are 100% up for debate and actual experts disagree all the time.
Remember, people hate learning or understanding one thing let alone conflicting ideas. Listening to a debate about the plausibility of anthropocentric CO2 and having actual climate scientists look over data... well it's not fucking happening. How many climate scientists have actually spoken about the issue? None. Fucking zero.
>Bill Nye is a mechanical engineer>author A is a geologist that studies mammal evolution>author B is a neuroscientist and skeptic>Greta is a little girlNone of these fucks are climate scientists. If you found an actual climate scientist and put him to the question, he would actually confess that the worst-case scenario of .02 celsius change with global-china levels of smog wouldn't change shit. Pollution is awful on its own, but generating any amount of CO2 that plausibly shifts a whole climate is insane. Like the CO2 required to heat the world noticeably would cause mass extinctions in the ocean FIRST, which would then cause an ecological collapse.
The climate is a complex system and CO2 is locked in a whole carbon cycle. The weird thing is that previous climate worries like the Ozone layer were fixed in a fucking day with the banning of chlorofluorocarbons. Acid rain was fixed in a week with tweaking smokestacks. The fucking CO2 in the atmosphere is the same shit as shells in the ocean, the same shit as chalk, the same fucking carbon in trees. You can't just fucking ban smoke for fuck's sake. But climate scientists are fucking retards apparently so they want to be 3 for 3 with banning "man-made pollutants." Acid rain and ozone layer were media sensations though so you can blame journalists too.